Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 section 101 summoning witnesses Court: orissa Page 1 of about 98 results (0.105 seconds)

Rabindranath Mishra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2008Ori19

..... other armed forces of the union.13. the crpf is one of the armed forces of the union like bsf, cisf, assam rifles, indo-tibetan border security force, s.s. b. security force and rapid action force. in this regard, section 3 of the c.r.p.f. ..... in view of the above discussion, we have no doubt in our mind that the central reserve police force is an armed force of the union like border security force and the cisf.17. now we come to the provision of reservation made in paragraph ..... of the force-(1) there shall continue to be an armed force maintained by the central government and called the central reserve police force.(2) the force shall be constituted in such manner, and the members of the force ghaty receive such pay, pension and ..... action (ii) permanently disabled in action and (iii) serving.11. now the first question arises as to whether the central reserve police force of which the petitioner is a member would come under armed forces or paramilitary forces. in this regard, it is necessary to .....

Miss Snigdha Sardar Vs. Chief General Manager, South Eastern Coalfield ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1993(I)OLR393

..... a bench of madhya pradesh high court in kuljit kaur v. union of india, 1930 lic 1136. in that case, though there was some dispute as to whether the indo-tibbetan private police school had been taken over by the kendriya vidyalaya sanghathan, the court ultimately found that it was a case of take-over. being of this view, the termination of .....

Kishore Chandra Patel and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1993Ori259; 76(1993)CLT720

..... sub-section (2) the authorised officer may, for the purpose of taking possession of any moneyor property referred to in sub-section (1), requisition the service of any police officer to assist and it shall be the bounden duty of such officer to comply with such requisition. 20. where an order if confiscation made under section 15 is ..... by the government. a perusal of home department file no. 734/92 made available to us as per out desire shows that the director-cum- i.g. of police, vigilance, had informed the government on 27-12-1992 about 19 cases covered by the act in which charge-sheets had been submitted, and the government made the ..... submission was made on 15-7-1993, we desired to be informed about the factual position. an affidavit was filed on 16-7-1993 by the additional superintendent of police (vigilance) stating that there were 13 other such cases (all involving high public offices) regarding which reference was made on 16th july for consideration to make necessary declaration. .....

Brundaban Chandra Dhir Narendra Vs. the State of Orissa in the Revenue ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1953Ori121

Jagannadhadas, C.J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution by the petitioner who is the proprietor of Madhupur Estate in Cuttack district, against the State of Orissa and the Court of Wards of the Orissa State, as well as against the Deputy Collector in charge of the Wards Estate. The State Government by virtue of the powers conferred on it under Section 16, Orissa Court of Wards Act, 1947, issued notification No. 9876/R dated the 7th December 1951, in the Revenue Department declaring the petitioner a disqualified proprietor under Section 10 (f) (iv) of the said Act and published the same in the Orissa Gazette in accordance with the provision of Section 21 of the Act. The Court of Wards assumed superintendence of the Madhupur Estate by virtue of the said notification on the 8th December 1951. Since then, the Estate has been under the management of the Court of Wards. The petitioner has accordingly come forward with this application dated the 5th March 1952, chal...

Prananath Patnaik Vs. Banamali Patnaik

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1958Ori228

P.V.B. Rao, J.1. This appeal is against the order of the Election Tribunal (Mr. T. V. Rao, District Judge Puri) passed on a petition filed under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, (hereinafter called the Act) by a defeated candidate, Shri Banamali Patnaik for the Orissa Legislative Assembly from the Khurda Constituency during the elections held in 1957 praying to declare the election of the returned candidate Shri Prananath Patnaik as void.2. The Election Tribunal by its order dated 20th November, 1957 declared the election of Shri Prananath Patnaik to the Orissa Legislative Assembly to be void on account of the corrupt practice committed by him under Section 123, Clause (4) of the Act and disqualified him from standing as a candidate for election to the House of Parliament or the State Legislative Assembly for a period of six years.3. The Respondent-Petitioner was a candidate set up by the Congress Party while the Appellant-Opposite Party was set up by the Commu...

Raghunath Misra Vs. Kishore Chandra Deo Bhanj and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1958Ori260

..... following classes, namely: (a) gazetted officers; (b) stipendiary judges and magistrates; (c) members of the armed forces of the union; (d) members of the police forces; (e) excise officers; (f) revenue officers including village accountants such as, patwaris, lekhpals, talatis, karnamsand the like but excluding other village officers; and (g ..... mahartha, krushna chandra jagadev and udayanath sarangi who are the sarpanches of balugaon, ankula nairi, nandapur, bhateswar and nachuni grama sabhas within the banpur police station respectively,respondent no. 1 has denied that, he appointed any of these persons as his agents for doing propaganda and also denied knowledge of ..... respondent no. 1 in the election. the appellantfurther alleged that respondent no. 1 obtained the assistance of sarpanches of several villages within the banpur police station represented by shri ram chandra praharaj and other named persons for the furtherance of the prospects of his election and appointed some of them .....

Gurua Naik Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

..... by the district magistrate, his duties and responsibilities, as outlined in the act and rules, make him more proximate with the police establishment and the police officer investigating the case in suitable cases, may influence him to give a statement alleging extra judicial confession before him by an accused ..... employed in investigation, especially in forcibly extracting confessions with the object of securing a conviction. the past conduct of the members of the police organization justified the provision. it is too much to suppose that the legislature did intend that all persons, who may have to investigate ..... 2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ c.r. dash, j.this reference by a division bench to the larger bench raises the question whether grama rakshi is a police officer within the meaning of that expression in section 25 of the indian evidence act. 2 2. after scrutinizing the evidence in the appeal, .....

Ch. Laxmikantham Vs. the Chairman, State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 101(2006)CLT65; [2006(108)FLR1144]; 2006(I)OLR275

..... inflicted on her on the following grounds :(i) that no evidence has been made out against her basing on the inquiry report submitted by the deputy superintendent of police, balasore in view of the statement of the account holder smt. satyabati das and other connected records.(ii) that the sole allegation against the petitioner as per charge ..... not have simulataneously initiated administrative action against the petitioner and should not have placed the petitioner under suspension. relying on the final report submitted by the police, he submitted that when police found no evidence against the petitioners and the petitioners involvement in the incident could not be prima facie made out in the ..... police investigation, the initiation of departmental proceeding is bad in law. it is the settled principle of law that both the departmental proceeding and the criminal .....

Banka Das, Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1993CriLJ442; 1992(II)OLR395

..... giving priority only to the interest of the nation and the security of the state. it is undoubtedly true that in our eastern and north-eastern borders there are some unfriendly foreign powers which, with evil and hostile designs, are constantly seducing political adventurisms and gullible inhabitants of that area and aiding ..... and law enforcement in view of the intolerable alternatives which are possible. if the officer has unrestrained authority to ignore persona! liberties, the product is a police state: if he is barred from any interference with private rights, the result is criminal anarchy. in order to avert these ative perils and their intermediate ..... under reference would not ipso facto be fatal to the prosecution. these provisions are intended to rule out the possibility of haphazard attempts by the police official against unmerited prosecutions. any deficiency in the collection of materials cannot affect the trial and conviction unless prejudice or failure of justice is the resultant .....

Smt. Nakka Bhikhyamana Vs. Sri Aurovindo Dhali and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1993Ori223

ORDERG.B. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioner has contested in the bye-election to 86-Malkanagiri (S.C.) Assembly Constituency along with respondents 1, 2 and 3. The vacancy having been caused on account of the death of Nakka Kanaya, the bye-election had been held on 8th of June, 1992. The petitioner contested the election on Janata Dal ticket with symbol 'Chakra'; respondent No. 1 contested as the candidate of Bharatiya Janata Party with symbol 'Lotus'; respondent No. 2 contested as the candidate of Indian National Congress with symbol 'Hand' and respondent No. 3 contested as an Independent candidate with the symbol 'Bow and arrow'. Respondent No. 1 was declared elected by the Returning Officer having polled a total number of votes of 27,156, whereas the petitioner had polled the second highest having polled 27,109; respondent No. 8 polled 13,588, whereas respondent No. 3 polled 827 votes. In this application filed under Section 101 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the petition...