Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 section 1 short title and commencement Court: gujarat Page 6 of about 52 results (0.221 seconds)

Oct 29 1996 (HC)

Urmila Naresh Mittal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1998)3GLR2438

..... were considered. it is settled that the detention order is an order passed under the statute and the law is settled right from the case of commissioner of police v. gordhandas reported in : [1952]1scr135 and mohinder singh v. chief election commissioner reported in : [1978]2scr272 that the statutory orders cannot be supported ..... the court had also been taken into consideration although the impugned detention order is alleged to have been based on fresh facts.47. in ahmedhussain v. police commissioner, ahmedabad (supra) also the court found that the material disclosing the grounds was vague with reference to the persons affected or victimised as also ..... in : 1989crilj2312 , vashisht narain karwaria v. state of u.p. reported in : 1990crilj1311 , gulab mehra v. state of u.p. reported in : 1988crilj168 , abdul razak nannekhan pathan v. police commissioner, ahmedabad reported in : [1989]3scr569 , mohd. yousuf v. state of j. & k. reported in : [1980]1scr258 . 45. in fogla & s.k. jalil v. state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2012 (HC)

Dhaval Gopalbhai Darji Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

..... patient monikaben. the evidence of dr.himanshubhai pravinbhai vyas vis-a-vis his complaint (exh.44) would clearly indicate that the witness gave information to the satellite police station on the basis of the information conveyed by the mother-in-law of the deceased. according to mr.shah, even reference to fir further discloses that after ..... undergo further simple imprisonment for six months. the learned additional sessions judge also found the appellant guilty of the offence punishable under section 135(1) of the bombay police act and consequently, sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and a fine of rs.1,000=00. in default of payment of fine, the ..... for the offences punishable under sections 302, 498a and 506(2) of the indian penal act and for the offences punishable under section 135(1) of the bombay police act, and is directed against an order of conviction and sentence dated 21st april 2007 passed by the learned additional sessions judge, fast track court no.2, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //