Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 chapter vii force courts Page 4 of about 988 results (0.237 seconds)

Aug 27 2003 (SC)

Indian Handicrafts Emporium and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3240; 2003(5)ALD39(SC); 106(2003)DLT350(SC); JT2003(7)SC446; 2003(6)SCALE831; (2003)7SCC589

..... signatory to the other treaties and conventions in this behalf. appendix i of cites which came into effect from 18th january, 1990 provided for complete prohibition of internal and trans border trade in ivory. the parliament enacted the amendment act (act no. 44 of 1991) with a view to save the species of indian elephant and to give effect to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2000 (SC)

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

..... to rajasthan will also help in checking the advancement of the thar desert. human habitation will increase there which, in turn, will help in protecting the so far porous border with pakistan.233. while considering gujarat's demand for water, the government had reports that with the construction of a high dam on the river narmada, water could not ..... of rajasthan to utilise the same for irrigation and drinking purposes in the arid and drought-prone areas of jalore and barmer districts of rajasthan situated on the international border with pakistan, which have no other available source of water.244. water is the basic need for the survival of human beings and is part of right of ..... and article 21 of the constitution of india. water in the rivers of india has great potentiality to change the miserable condition of the arid, drought-prone and border areas of india.246. the availability of drinking water will benefit about 1.91 lac of people residing in 124 villages in arid and drought-prone .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 1993 (SC)

Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Association and Another Vs. Union of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC268; JT1993(5)SC497; (1993)4SCC441; [1993]Supp2SCR659

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.(for himself and on behalf of Yogeshwar Dayal, G.N. Ray, Dr. A.S. Anand & S.P. Bharucha, JJ.) :1. By and Order dated October 26,1990 passed in Subhash Sharma and Ors. and Anr. Union of India (1990) 2 S.C.R. 433 and the matters connected therewith, the papers of Writ petition No. 1303 of 1987 - Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Anr. v. Union Of India were directed to be placed before the learned Chief Justice of India for constituting a Bench of nine Judges to examine the two question referred therein, namely, the position of the Chief Justice of India with reference to primacy, and justiciability of fixation of Judge strength. That Order was made since the referring Bench was of the opinion, that the correctness of the majority view in S.P. Gupta and Ors. etc. etc. v. Union of India and Ors. etc. etc. : [1982]2SCR365 , required reconsideration by a larger Bench. This is how these questions arise for decision by this Bench.2. The context in which the a...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1997 (HC)

ivory Traders and Manufacturers Association Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)333; 2(1997)CLT273; 67(1997)DLT145; 1997(42)DRJ131

..... : air1984bom366 . on the basis of these decisions, which were rendered in the context of article 31 of the constitution he submitted that the state has no police powers under the constitution to acquire the property without payment of compensation. the submissions of the learned counsel do not arise in the facts and circumstances of the ..... not misused under the pretext of being used for medical and toilet preparations containing alcohol. it was held that such regulation was a necessary concomitant of the police power of the state to regulate trade or business which is inherently dangerous to public health. the restrictions imposed by section 12-b as to the ..... trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora (for short `cites') with effect from january 18, 1990, member states including india prohibited internal and trans border trade in ivory. commenting upon the legislative measurers taken in this country, he pointed out that the parliament in order to save the indian elephant and to give .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1997 (HC)

M/S. Ivory Traders and Manufacturers Association and Other Vs. Union o ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi267b; ILR1997Delhi22

..... trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora (for short 'cites') with effect from january 18, 1990, member states including india prohibited internal and trans border trade in ivory. commenting upon the legislative measures taken in this country, he pointed out that the parliament in order to save the indian elephant and to ..... not misused under the pretext of being used for medicinal and toilet preparations containing alcohol. it was held that such regulation was a necessary concomitant of the police power of the state to regulate trade or business which is inherently dangerous to public health. the restrictions imposed by section 12-b as to the ..... : air1984bom366 . on the basis of these decisions, which were rendered in the context of article 31 of the constitution he submitted that the state has no police powers under the constitution to acquire the property without payment of compensation. the submissions of the learned counsel do not arise in the facts and circumstances of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1993 (SC)

Ajay Agarwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC1637; 1993(2)ALT(Cri)396; [1994]79CompCas1(SC); 1993CriLJ2516; 1993(2)Crimes342(SC); JT1993(3)SC203; 1993(2)SCALE757; (1993)3SCC609; [1993]3SCR543

ORDERK. Ramaswamy, J.1. Special leave granted.2, The appellant, accused No. 2 in P.Ch. (CBI) No. 40/2, dated February 18, 1985, F.I.R. No. RC No. 2 to 4/1983 dated March 4, 1983 and P.S. SPE/CBI/CTU(E) I/New Delhi, Dist. Delhi and four other namely, V.P. Anand, Baldev Raj Sharma, Bansi Lal and Ranjit Kumar Marwah are accused in the said case. It is the prosecution case that the accused hatched a conspiracy at Chandigarh to cheat Punjab National Bank for short 'PNB'. .In furtherance thereof V.P. Anand floated three New Link Enterprises and M/ s. Moonlight Industries in the name of Baldev Raj Sharma, his employee and M/ s. Guru Nanak Industries in the name of Bansi Lal, yet another employee. He opened current accounts in their respective names in the P.N.B. at Chandigarh. In furtherance of the conspiracy and in confabulation with V.P. Anand, the appellant, Ajay Aggarwal, a non-resident Indian at Dubai who is running M/s. Sales International, Dubai, agreed to and got credit facility by wa...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 2004 (HC)

Mahesh Agriculture Implements and Forgings Ltd. Vs. Member, Industrial ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR809; 2005(2)BomCR625

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. In this petition, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, the petitioner/employer challenges the appellate judgments delivered by respondent No. 1 - Member, Industrial Court, Nagpur, under Section 84 of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to BIR), thereby upholding the order of 2nd Labour Court, Nagpur dated 27-8-1987 delivered in Application (BIR) No. 112/1984. By this order, the Labour Court has found that the action of petitioners in taking away the work of Chowkidar/Watchman from respondent No. 3/employee, and entrusting the work of Supervisor to him, and changing his occupation/designation in the Attendance Card, is an illegal changed. The 2nd Labour Court has directed the petitioners to withdraw that illegal change.2. The facts in brief in this respect can be stated as under:i) The petitioner is a public limited company and has got its establishment at small Factory area Bhandara Road, Nagpur. The petitioner cont...

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 1991 (SC)

Ex-naik Sardar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1992CriLJ289; 1991(2)Crimes674(SC); [1991(63)FLR261]; JT1991(3)SC1; (1992)IILLJ155bSC; 1991(1)SCALE899; (1991)3SCC213; [1991]2SCR676; 1991(2)LC466(SC)

..... had a valid permit. he was taking this liquor to his home town to celebrate his brother-in-law's marriage, but to his bad luck, the civil police of surendra nagar checked his baggage and confiscated the bottles as he had no valid permit to carry the extra bottles. unless these circumstances the question is whether such ..... over him to his unit authorities for action. the 6th respondent, the officer commanding, 89 field regiment, ordered a summary court-martial during which the witnesses including the civil police officer of surendra nagar were examined. ultimately the summary court-martial sentenced the appellant to three months' r.i. and dismissed him from service with effect from 9th october, ..... of delivery of the extra 7 bottles of rum. enroute to his home town he had to pass through surendra nagar which was under prohibition. the local civil police at surendra nagar intercepted him and confiscated the bottles of liquor and handed over the appellant alongwith the liquor bottles to the city .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 1979 (HC)

Union of India Vs. Tolaram Hariram and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1981ACJ207; AIR1980Guj172; (1979)2GLR371

Nanavatl, J. 1. The question of law, and of some importance, which arises in these revision applications for our consideration is whether a consignor who is not an owner of a part of the goods consigned by him (whom we shall call 'consignor-non-owner' for the sake of convenience) along with his own goods and under the same parcel way bill, is competent to file a suit for recovery of compensation from the Railway administration for loss, destruction, deterioration or damage caused to the goods as a result of delay or detention on the part of the Railway administration in their carriage? This question being common ~to all these revision applications, they are all disposed of together by this common judgment.2. The acts in all these cases are similar; and, therefore, we will refer to the representative facts of Civil Revision Application No. 272 of 1977 wily. It arises out of Regular Civil Suit No. 3963 of 1970 filed in the Small Cause Court at Ahmedabad, by M/s.Tolaram, Hariram and K. A....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2007 (HC)

Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC7; 2007(148)LC7(Delhi); 2009(235)ELT60(Del)

..... or products of these species. the tibetan antelope has also been provided the highest protection under the convention on international trade in endangered species, under appendix i of the said convention. china ..... been specifically excluded from the definition of 'animal articles' and not animal hair.16. further, the us fish and wildlife service (usfws) has listed the tibetan antelope or chiru, as an endangered species under the authority of endangered species act. the said endangered species act prohibits the international commercial sale of any parts ..... of bushes, view the piles of skinned carcassesdiscovered by ant poachingpersonnel of examine the heaps of skins and bundles of wool seized by forest police and customs in china and india would immediately realize such explanationns to be falsehoods, designed to reassure and dupe potential customs in countries far .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //