Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2009ACJ585; 2008(6)MhLj941
..... negligently gave a dash to the motor-cycle and resultantly he sustained injuries. a case under sections 279, 337 and 338 of the indian penal code was registered with the police station, udgir. the appellant resultantly of the accident sustained permanent disability to the extent of 48%. he filed a petition under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 being .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1993SC1804; JT1993(2)SC1; 1993(1)SCALE489; 1994Supp(1)SCC324; [1993]1SCR891
..... the same in consultation with the government of sikkim. before sikkim joined india, buddhism was the state religion. the gazetteer 1864 of sikkim stated that 'lamas or tibetan buddhism is the state religion of sikkim'. the position continued till 1974 when the elections for constituent assembly were held. the case of the writ petitioner is ..... reasons would be upheld.71. we are of the view that the impugned provisions have been found in the wisdom of parliament necessary in the admission of strategic border-state into the union. the departures'are not such as to negate fundamental principles of democracy. we accordingly hold and answer contentions (b), (c) and (d ..... deemed to be the first assembly duly constituted under the said act.146. in order to give effect to the wishes of the people of sikkim for strengthening indo-sikkim cooperation and inter-relationship, the constitution of india was amended by the constitution (thirty-fifth amendment) act, 1974, as a result of which article 2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3123 of 2020 DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATIL ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE CHIEF MINISTER & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3124 of 2020 SANJEET SHUKLA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3133 of 2020 KRISHNAJI DATTATRAYA MORE ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3134 of 2020 MADHUSHRI NANDKISHOR JETHLIYA & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3131 of 2020 DEVENDRA ROOPCHAND JAIN & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3129 of 2020 KAMALAKAR SUKHDEO DARODE @ DARWADE ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) NO.915 of 2020 DESHMUKH ESHA GIRISH ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... of large chunk of 35 property acquired is by drawing a memorandum of taking possession as state is not going to put other persons in possession or its police force or going to cultivate it or start residing or physically occupy it after displacing who were physically in possession as in the case of certain private persons, ..... v. subhash chandra yograj sinha, air1961sc1596 dwarka prasad v. dwarka das saraf, 1976 (1) scc128 the commissioner of income-tax, mysore, travancore-cochin and coorg, bangalore v. the indo mercantile bank ltd., 1959 (supp2) scr256in romesh kumar sharma v. union of india and ors., (2006) 6 scc510 181 designated in the act and are to continue under the ..... physical possession of the land. on the large chunk of property or otherwise which is acquired, the government is not supposed to put some other person or the police force in possession to retain it and start cultivating it till the land is used by it for the purpose for which it has been acquired. the government .....
Tag this Judgment!