Court : Supreme Court of India
..... offence , i.e., the offence referred to in sub-section (1), as per the report submitted or complaint filed by the investigating authority . the report submitted here refers to a police report under section 173 of the crpc, and complaints filed by investigating authorities under special acts, as opposed to private complaints. if the language of the second proviso is taken .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... to agreements to arbitrate between parties that were nationals of different contracting states. this was the sole criterion for internationality : other agreements to arbitrate, even if they involved classic cross-border international trade or investment, were not subject to the protocol. in contrast, as noted above, the text of article ii of the new york convention does not expressly address the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... of which such data must be maintained so that the scale of the problem can be mapped out and tailored remedial action can be taken; (iv) police officers should be provided sensitization, on a regular basis, to deal with cases of sexual violence against women with disabilities, in an appropriate way. the training ..... ii) trained special educators and interpreters must be appointed to ensure the effective realization of the reasonable accommodations embodied in the criminal law amendment act, 2013. all police stations should maintain a database of such educators, interpreters and legal aid providers, in order to facilitate easy access and coordination; 39 committee on the rights ..... of accessible information. as a result, they often do not get the support they need at every stage of the justice process: reporting the abuse to police, getting appropriate medical care, and navigating the court system. 26 32 in india, no disaggregated data is maintained on the extent of violence against women and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3123 of 2020 DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATIL ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE CHIEF MINISTER & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3124 of 2020 SANJEET SHUKLA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3133 of 2020 KRISHNAJI DATTATRAYA MORE ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3134 of 2020 MADHUSHRI NANDKISHOR JETHLIYA & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3131 of 2020 DEVENDRA ROOPCHAND JAIN & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3129 of 2020 KAMALAKAR SUKHDEO DARODE @ DARWADE ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) NO.915 of 2020 DESHMUKH ESHA GIRISH ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... surgeons and physicians) being subjected to criminal prosecution are on an increase. sometimes such prosecutions are filed by private complainants and sometimes by the police on an fir being lodged and cognizance taken. the investigating officer and the private complainant cannot always be supposed to have knowledge of medical science ..... additional solicitor general argued that the question of whether a writ of habeas corpus could be maintained in respect of a person who was in police custody pursuant to a remand order passed by the jurisdictional magistrate in connection with the offence under investigation, had already been settled by this court ..... their homes.6. all transport services air, rail, roadways will remain suspended. exceptions: a. transportation for essential good only. . .. .. e. cross land border movement of essential goods including petroleum products and lpg, food products, medical supplies. f. intra and inter-state movement of harvesting and sowing related machines like .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.3224 of 2020 Ebix Singapore Private Limited .... Appellant Versus Committee of Creditors of Educomp .... Respondents Solutions Limited & Anr. With Civil Appeal No.3560 of 2020 Kundan Care Products Limited .... Appellant Versus Mr Amit Gupta and Ors. .... Respondents With Civil Appeal No.295 of 2021 Seroco Lighting Industries Private Limited .... Appellant Versus Ravi Kapoor RP for Arya Filaments .... Respondents Private Limtied & Ors. 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. Further, a Glossary of defined terms which have been used throughout the judgment has also been provided. The sections in the judgment are as follows: Glossary ............................................................................................................ 5 A Civil Appeal No 3224 of 2020 the Ebix Appeal ...................................... 11 A.1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.1167 OF2021IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.3559 OF2020SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA ...APPELLANT VERSUS PERRY KANSAGRA RESPONDENT ORDER UDAY UMESH LALIT, J.1. Civil Appeal No.3559 of 2020 arose from Guardianship Petition filed by Perry Kansagra (hereinafter referred to as Perry), father of minor named Aditya Vikram Kansagra (hereinafter referred to as Aditya), under Sections 7, 8, 10, 11 of the Act1 before the District Court, Saket, New Delhi. Perry is a person of Indian origin and Gujarati by descent. His grandfather migrated to Kenya in 1935 and settled there. The family has business interests in Kenya and United Kingdom. Perry holds dual citizenship of Kenya as well as United Kingdom. Perry got married to Smriti Madan Kansagra (hereinafter referred to as Smriti), an Indian citizen, on 29.07.2007 at New Delhi. Initially, the couple stayed at 1 The Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 2 Nairobi, Kenya but Smri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
[REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 12122-12123 OF2018MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ANKITA SINHA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.86/2019 CIVIL APPEAL No.5902/2019 CIVIL APPEAL No.6273 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.6732/2021) CIVIL APPEAL No.6274 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.5930/2021) CIVIL APPEAL No.6275 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.6733/2021) CIVIL APPEAL No.6276 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.16448 OF2021 Diary No.11655/2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.6277-6278 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.16449-16450 OF2021 Diary No.13789/2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.6279 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.16451 OF2021 Diary No.13811/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO.6280-6281 OF2021Page 1 of 77 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.16452-16453 OF2021 Diary No.13890/2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.2897/2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.6282 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.11426 OF2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.6283 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.11427 OF2021 CIVIL APP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6659 OF2011ARUNACHALA GOUNDER (DEAD) BY LRS. .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PONNUSAMY AND ORS. .. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J.Challenge has been laid in this Civil Appeal to the judgment and order dated 21.01.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras (hereinafter referred to as High Court) dismissing a regular First Appeal being A.S. No.351 of 1994 filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 01.03.1994 rendered by the Trial Court dismissing Original Suit No.295 of 1991 for partition filed by the appellant herein, claiming 1/5th share in the suit properties. 12. The following genealogy of the parties is necessary to be taken note of for appreciating their claims and contentions : Gurunatha Gounder Marappa Gounder (Son) Ramasamy Gounder (Son) (Died on 11.05.1949) (Predeceased his brother Marappa Gounder) Kupayee Ammal (Daughter)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... on behalf of the new owner, whoever it may be, by the person entrusted with the executive powers. it was argued that event before the police action estates of jagirdars escheated to the diwani and never to the ruler. i would not attach any importance to such precedents, for in atiyat matters the rulers of ..... was vested in the ruler as his prerogative on the basis of his being the seignior of the manor and could be exercised only by him even after the police action. but after the passing of the regulation and the vesting of the seigniory in the government the power of regranting becomes statutory and capable of being exercised ..... protected by sub-clause (2) of section 13 of the enquiries act having been passed by the sovereign under his authority. this court held as under: 5. the police action in hyderabad took place in september, 1948. after its termination a series of legislative measures were enacted by the military governor by virtue of power conferred on him by .....
Tag this Judgment!