Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2008(13)SCALE541; 2008(6)LHSC4150; 2009(2)KCCRSN55
..... he had made a few preliminary sniffs he set off and tracked continuously until he stopped in evident perplexity at the spot where the accused had been put into the police car. at the trial it appeared that other evidence against the accused that they had been stealing the wire was inconclusive and that the evidence of the behaviour of the ..... by the deceased, (ii) the accused persons were seen on the date and time of the incident near the place of the incident which led to their involvement, (iii) the police dog squad proved the guilt of the accused persons, (iv) the witnesses had no reason to implicate the accused persons falsely and (v) there is no missing link in the ..... .00 a.m. in the morning when kumari suneeta, the deceased victim aged about 14 years had gone to ease herself in the nearby open field in village jamal nagar police station safipur district unnao. when on 17-11-1992 at about 7.00 a.m. kumari suneeta had gone to attend the call of nature in the nearby open field .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... established by leading evidence showing the relationship between the speech and the resultant public disorder . in other cases where public disorder has not occurred due to police, third party intervention, or otherwise, the clear and present danger or imminent lawless action tests are of relevance and importance. freedom and rational dictum ..... aspects. however, our observations on the factual matrix of the present case in this decision should not in any manner influence the investigation by the police who shall independently apply their mind and ascertain the true and correct facts, on all material and relevant aspects. similarly, the competent authority would independently ..... the investigation into the cognizable offence disclosed from the facts mentioned in the first information report and entered in the station house diary by the police officer or such other cognizable offences as may come to his notice during the investigation, will be statements falling under section 162 crpc. no such .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... functions. for the application of laws, particularly, the provisions of the lokayukt act and the prevention of corruption act, 1988, the jurisdiction of the lokayukt or the madhya pradesh special police establishment is for all public servants (except the speaker and the deputy speaker of the madhya pradesh vidhan sabha for the purposes of the lokayukt act) and no privilege is ..... that in view of the special expertise that is necessary for this type of inquiry the committee of privileges do not provide an investigative machinery comparable to that of a police investigation. (emphasis supplied) 113. therefore, we hold that clause (2) of article 105 does not grant immunity against bribery to any person as the receipt of or agreement to receive .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... left out matching the acreage of the changed area with the acreage area of the block allocated to them. it was pointed out by cmpdil that the area between orissa border and block boundary which has been covered by m/s. jindal steel and power ltd., could not form an independent block and should have been included earlier in the area ..... that m/s. jindal steel & power limited had shifted the area of the block to cover an adjoining area containing a coal reserve of about 15 million tonne between the border of the state of orissa and block boundary which is in the state of chhattisgarh. on the other side, a portion of the block containing a reserve of about 36 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... principles criminal of jurisprudence. it also aims to protect honest public servants from harassment by prescribing that the investigation against them could be made only by police officials of particular status and by making the sanction of the to 136 government or other appropriate officer a pre-condition for their prosecution. as it ..... of offence of rape committed on her after having witnessed the incident 30 (2013) 5 scc 546 47 either to the local police or to the juvenile justice board, gave certain directions for compliance in future which are necessary to protect the children from such sexual abuses. the court ..... in the schematic backdrop struck a harmonious bond. 43. in shankar kisanrao khade v. state of maharashtra30, the court, taking into consideration the conduct of the police for not registering a case under section 377 ipc against the accused, the agony undergone by a child of 11 years with moderate intellectual disability, non reporting .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL No.6677 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(C) No.36771 of 2016) STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. .Appellants VERSUS LORD NORTHBROOK AND ORS. .Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 17.11.2016 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench in DB Civil Writ Petition No.2713 of 1987 in and by which the High Court quashed the communications/orders dated 03.07.1987, 22.07.1987 and 03.08.1987 passed by the Deputy Secretary, Revenue, Govt. of Rajasthan, District Collector, Jhunjhunu and Tehsildar, Khetri respectively in the matter of taking over the properties of Sh. Raja Sardar Singh by the State under the Rajasthan Escheats Regulation Act, 1956. 1 3. Sh. Raja Sardar Singh expired on 28.01.1987 intestate and without any legal heirs. Sh. Raja Sardar Singh was a Bar at law from England, a member of the Constituent Assembly, a Rajya Sabha Member and also Ambass...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... decree, which may be a fact in issue are irrelevant 135 143. we may notice a three judge bench judgment of this court in k.g. premshankar vs. inspector of police and anr., (2002) 8 scc87in which case this court had occasion to consider the effect of decision of civil court on the criminal proceeding. this court had also occasion to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.3224 of 2020 Ebix Singapore Private Limited .... Appellant Versus Committee of Creditors of Educomp .... Respondents Solutions Limited & Anr. With Civil Appeal No.3560 of 2020 Kundan Care Products Limited .... Appellant Versus Mr Amit Gupta and Ors. .... Respondents With Civil Appeal No.295 of 2021 Seroco Lighting Industries Private Limited .... Appellant Versus Ravi Kapoor RP for Arya Filaments .... Respondents Private Limtied & Ors. 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. Further, a Glossary of defined terms which have been used throughout the judgment has also been provided. The sections in the judgment are as follows: Glossary ............................................................................................................ 5 A Civil Appeal No 3224 of 2020 the Ebix Appeal ...................................... 11 A.1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... be meted out to the guilty. this argument is again misleading and unacceptable. guilt or innocence has to be determined by the courts and not by the police. police merely prosecutes on being satisfied that a person is guilty of an offence; it doesn t punish. it is also suggested that there is a distinct ..... , yet it is one of its primary requisites particularly in the investigation of serious and heinous crimes. the legislature also noticed this and, has therefore, permitted limited police custody. (emphasis supplied) 69.the interplay between section 19(1) of the pmla, 2002 and section 167 of the crpc, 1973, as discussed, would facilitate ..... corpus petition is allowed in the following terms:- 1. the writ of habeas corpus petition is maintainable; 2. enforcement directorate is not entrusted with the powers to seek police custody under the prevention of money laundering act, 2002; 3. miscellaneous petition filed by respondent 1 seeking exclusion of the period is dismissed; 7 17. justice d .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
[REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 12122-12123 OF2018MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ANKITA SINHA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.86/2019 CIVIL APPEAL No.5902/2019 CIVIL APPEAL No.6273 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.6732/2021) CIVIL APPEAL No.6274 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.5930/2021) CIVIL APPEAL No.6275 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.6733/2021) CIVIL APPEAL No.6276 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.16448 OF2021 Diary No.11655/2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.6277-6278 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.16449-16450 OF2021 Diary No.13789/2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.6279 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.16451 OF2021 Diary No.13811/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO.6280-6281 OF2021Page 1 of 77 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.16452-16453 OF2021 Diary No.13890/2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.2897/2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.6282 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.11426 OF2021 CIVIL APPEAL No.6283 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(C) No.11427 OF2021 CIVIL APP...
Tag this Judgment!