Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian telegraph amendment act 2006 section 1 short title and commencement Court: karnataka Page 3 of about 866 results (0.234 seconds)

S.M. Rao and ors. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4678

..... of an interim order directed the respondent to approach the deputy commissioner for removal of obstructions as contemplated under section 51 of the indian electricity act 1910 read with indian telegraph act 1885. in accordance with the directions, the respondents approached the deputy commissioner/district magistrate and the deputy commissioner after giving full opportunity ..... is no need for the court to review the impugned action on merit, particularly at the behest of the appellants-petitioners. prior to the constitution (44th amendment) act, 1978, the right to property was guaranteed by article 31. while clause (1) of article 31 has been shifted from part-ill, to article 300a ..... article 19, which guaranteed the right to acquire and hold the property, has also been omitted by the same 44th amendment act, 1978. the consequence of these changes brought about by the constitution (44th amendment) act, 1978, in short is that - (i) the right to hold property has ceased to be a fundamental right .....

G.M. Venkatareddy and Others Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar Distri ...

Court : Karnataka

..... is not null and void. this conclusion was arrived at by the division bench in gangamma keeping in perspective section 4(1) and section 5 of the ptcl act. we affirm that the amendments mentioned above, in terms, saved the conditions of the grant and did not have the effect of removing the embargo of non-alienation contained therein. we ..... is justified.22. in order to avoid prolixity we shall go no further than mention union of india vs k.s.subramanian, air 1976 sc 2433 and indian petrochemicals corporation ltd.-vs-shramik sena, air 2001 sc 3510. an entire and complete discussion on this subject is now to be found in shankar raju vs. union of ..... avoid unnecessary delay or protracting the proceedings.4. in this analysis, we are bound to read and construe the ptcl act in a manner that conduces and continues the enjoyment of granted land by the backward sections of indian society. benefit of doubt or of construction of the statute should ensure to the advantage of the grantee/seller even .....

Dr. B.K. Naik and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Ministry of Lay and P ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... state of tamil nadu vs state of kerala reported in air 2014 sc 2407 while examining the constitutionality of kerala irrigation and water conservation (amendment) act, 2006 and declaring it as unconstitutional in its application to and effect on the mullaperiar dam was also examining the separation of powers between ..... separation of powers. (ii) independence of courts from the executive and legislature is fundamental to the rule of law and one of the basic tenets of indian constitution. separation of judicial power is a significant constitutional principle under the constitution of india. (iii) separation of powers between three organs legislature, ..... words, the doctrine of separation of power though not expressly engrafted in the constitution, its sweep, operation and visibility are apparent from the scheme of indian constitution. constitution has made demarcation, without drawing formal lines between the three organs legislature, executive and judiciary. in that sense, even in the .....

M/S. Gateway Hotels and Gateway Resorts Limited, Bangalore Vs. Nagarah ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(5)KarLJ63

..... approval of the central government. 5. what is meant by 'non-forest purpose' has been explained by the forest (conservation) amendment act, 1988 through the amendment of section 2 of the principal act. the said explanation reads thus: 'explanation.--for the purpose of this section 'non-forest purpose' means the breaking up or clearing ..... matters connected therewith or ancillary and incidental thereto'.10. in the statement of objects and reasons of the wildlife (protection) (amendment) act no. 23 of 1982, it was stated-'the wildlife (protection) act, 1972 (53 of 1972) provides for the protection of wild animals and birds and for matters connected therewith or ancillary ..... their population management or for introduction in alternative suitable habitat of endangered species like the great indian rhinoceros and the asiatic lion. to achieve this purpose it is necessary to suitably amend section 12 of the said act with the stipulation that in the case of any wild animals specified in schedule-i, .....

State Vs. Subash

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1552; 1991(2)KarLJ132

..... (2) were substituted by the words 'ninety days' by the criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1978 (for short the amending act'.) and the whole of the said amending act had been subsequently repealed by the parliament by enacting the repealing and amending act, 1988 (for short the repealing act') and, therefore, the law that was prevailing on the date of order of ..... burden of ever increasing spate of legislation and to remove confusion from the public mind. the object of the repealing and amending act of 1952 was only to expurgate the amending act of 1949, along with similar act, which had served its purpose...'therefore, i find considerable force in the argument of sri y.r. jagadeesh, learned high ..... their release on bail.2. the relevant facts are as under:respondents-applicants are facing trial for an offence under section 302 read with section 34 ipc in sessions case no. 24/1990 on the file of the learned sessions judge. respondents are alleged to have committed the murder of one kashappa in .....

M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 4 scc 602] (hitendra vishnu thakur), the hon'ble supreme court in the context of substantive and procedural law has laid down the ambit and scope of an amending act and its retrospective operation in the following terms: (i) a statute which affects substantive rights is presumed to be prospective in operation unless made retrospective, either expressly ..... date of adjudication of the pre-emption suit and the appellate court was not required to take into consideration the substituted provision introduced by section 15 of the amended act. thus, the hon'ble supreme court, in the aforesaid decision has borne in mind the distinction between substantive law and procedural law in the context of ..... fresh enactment. thus, when an existing provision is substituted by a fresh enactment, it is a case of express repeal. c) in government of india v. indian tobacco association [(2005)7 scc 396], the question that fell for the consideration of the hon'ble supreme court was as to what would be the effect of .....

Ramaiah Vs. State of Karnataka by Secretary, Revenue Department and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2003Kant296; ILR2003KAR1385; 2004(2)KarLJ45

..... it to say that the division bench of this court in shri kudli sringeri maha samsthanam v. state of karnataka having declared the karnataka inams abolition laws (amendment act), 1979 (karnatka act no. 26 of 1979) to be unconstitutional, still-born, void ab initio and as a consequence the jurisdiction to consider applications of claims for registration of ..... s case (supra) sought to save the order passed by the tribunal, which order had been passed before the provisions of the karnataka inams abolition laws (amendment) act, 1979 (karnataka act no. 26 of 1979) was held to be unconstitutional by this court in kudli sringeri maha samsthanam's case by referring to and relying upon the decision ..... office of the judge or due to his disqualification to hold the office. the de facto judge doctrine is a doctrine which had gained recognition even in indian courts by the time the supreme court employed this doctrine in gokaraju's case supra. the thinking of the supreme court and the extent to which the .....

High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore rep. by Registrar General Vs. Jai C ...

Court : Karnataka

..... tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the administration of justice in any other manner; 66. the parliament amended the act and substituted section 13 by contempt of courts (amendment) act, 2006 by way of substitution which reads as under:- "13. contempts not punishable in certain cases.- notwithstanding anything contained in ..... stopped thereafter due to second doubts. "this should not happen to the innocent devotees visiting temples", he said" similar reports have appeared in prajavani, indian express, times of india, dna city, the hindu, kannada prabha, samyuktha karnataka etc., copies of the news items published in the aforesaid news papers ..... 2003 and stopped thereafter due to several doubts. this should not happen to the innocent devotees visiting temples." similar reports have appeared in the prajavani, indian express, times of india, dna city, the hindu, kannada prabha, samyuktha karnataka etc., copies of the article published in the aforesaid newspapers are .....

The Workmen of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Repr. by K.S ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(5)KarLJ393; ILR2007(3)Kar3755; 2007(5)AIRKarR257; AIR2007NOC2234

..... order to do so, they must be 'aggrieved persons'. it is not in dispute that 1st petitioner is a registered trade union registered under the provisions of indian trade unions act of 1926. the workmen of ksrtc and respondents no. 5 to 7 are its members. no doubt the 2nd petitioner may not have locus standi to challenge ..... government, the 5th respondent has prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.6. originally, the petitioners have sought to treat this as public interest litigation. subsequently, an amendment application i.a.ii was filed to delete the sentence relating to pil in the writ petition. the said application was allowed by this court by order dated 1 ..... order/action of the state government, 2nd respondent also prayed for dismissal of the writ petition. in the amended objections filed, it is stated that the impugned order/action in a government policy and since the government has acted in a fair and responsible manner, the petitioners have no right to contest the same and this court .....

iti Employees Housing Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. the State of Karna ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR584; 2009(3)KarLJ364:2009(2)KCCR10092009(2)AIRKarR441(D.B)

..... is not taken by the deputy commissioner of the district as required under section 16(2) of the land acquisition (karnataka extension and amendment) act 1961 (hereinafter called as the l.a. act). this fact is not disputed by the appellant's society.12. now the question for our consideration in this appeal is whether there ..... support of this legal submission ha has placed strong reliance upon the decision of the supreme court in the case of ajit kumar nag v. general manager (pj), indian oil corporation ltd., haldia and ors. reported in : air2005sc4217 :7. elaborating the submissions, learned counsel contended that compliance of principles of natural justice by the state ..... .8.2006 directed the learned government advocate to secure the original records pertaining to the denotification proceedings initiated under section 48(1) of the l.a. act by the state government in respect of the land in question and the same is produced before us fox our perusal. learned counsel further submits that reliance .....