Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian telegraph amendment act 2006 section 1 short title and commencement Court: delhi Page 10 of about 863 results (0.102 seconds)

Jan 19 1977 (HC)

Om Oil and Oilseeds Exchange Limited, Delhi Vs. Union of India and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1977Delhi132; 1977RLR251

..... filed in the following circumstances. by an order made by the administrator of delhi on november 27, 1972 under s. 5 of the indian telegraph act, 1985 (for short the act) the superintendent of police was authorised to take temporary possession of certain specified telephones installed in the various rooms and cabins of the building ..... ordinary civil appellate jurisdiction of this court and of the civil -appellate jurisdiction of the supreme court. the amendment would effect a change in the forum for such review leaving the power of judicial review otherwise unimpaired. this contention must, thereforee, fail. 12. that ..... art. 226 of the constitution of india apparently because it has yet to come into force. even this amendment does not impair the extent of judicial review of executive action in that notwithstanding this amendment executive action would be justiciable, independently of the fundamental rights, in a regular civil action subject to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2011 (HC)

Bhola Nath Vij Vs. Kanwar Karan Singh

Court : Delhi

..... burden to prove that the nomination paper of an election candidate had been wrongly accepted was on the election petitioner in terms of section 103 of the indian evidence act, the burden of proof thereafter would shift to the returned candidate and more so, in relation to certain matters within the special knowledge of the returned ..... court while dealing with the alleged corrupt practice of the returned candidate, held that the appellant having failed to plead complete details of the corrupt practice, the amendment application filed by it at the conclusion of hearing of the appeal could not be entertained since a new ground could not be raised or inserted in an ..... of limitation. the relevant portion of the judgment reads as under: "31. .. at the conclusion of hearing of the appeal before us appellant made applications for amending the election petition, to remove the defects pointed out by the high court and to render the allegations of corrupt practice in accordance with the provisions of s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2011 (HC)

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. Raj Kumar Arora and anr

Court : Delhi

..... to be falling in the explanation of medical and scientific purpose under section 8 (c), the onus is on them to prove as per section 105 of the indian evidence act and till that onus is discharged, the court has to presume the commission of offences. 6. learned counsel for the petitioner states that the observation of this ..... order. during the pendency of the revision challenging the order on charge before this court, respondent no. 3 had moved an application dated 10th february, 2006 for amendment of charge under section 216 cr.p.c. in the order dated 1st august, 2006 passed by this court in criminal revision petition 204 of 2005 filed by ..... is impugned in the present proceedings was passed. mr. sud, also submitted that he had moved an application under section 216 of code of criminal procedure 1973 for amendment/ alteration of the charge. that application, i have been told is pending before the learned additional sessions judge. in these circumstances it would be appropriate if the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2011 (HC)

M/S. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs.

Court : Delhi

..... 373 (ap) has also held as under:- "14. be it noted that sections 391 and 77a of the act are independent of each other. section 77a of the act, which was incorporated by reason of the companies (amendment) act, 1999, and which came into effect from january 31, 1999, was not given any overriding effect over the provisions ..... objection of mr. lakhani, raised on the principle of 'first in last out' is, therefore, rejected."(emphasis supplied). 38. the fact that minority shareholders are indian and the majority promoter shareholders are foreigners is of no relevance as long as the mandate of law is complied with. this court is of the opinion that there ..... affidavit supporting the objection of mr. mathuradas. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without prejudice to its rights and contentions, petitioner is willing to pay to the indian public shareholders an amount of rs.1500/- per equity share. in view of the aforesaid offer, mr. ankit shah, learned counsel for mr. janak mathuradas and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2018 (HC)

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd vs.aditya Pandey and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... defendants through: mr. abhishek malhotra and mr. angad s. dugal, advs. coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv sahai endlaw1 the plaintiff indian performing right society ltd. instituted this suit, as per amended plaint dated 3rd april, 2009, for permanent injunction restraining the defendants synergy media entertainment ltd. and its senior manager (finance) aditya pandey, both ..... pleading as under:-" jurisdiction:27. this hon ble court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit under section 62(2) of the copyright act, 1957 as the plaintiff carries on business within the jurisdiction of this hon ble court through its branch office situated at b-317, som dutt chamber- ..... has been held in sanjay dalia supra that having a branch office alone is not sufficient for creating jurisdiction under section 62(2) of the copyright act. it is further pleaded that the plaintiff has its principal office in mumbai, maharashtra and the plaint be returned to be presented before the high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2009 (HC)

Sarat Chandra Bose Patsamatla Vs. National Board of Examination

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT368

..... mci, will be allowed to appear in the screening test for the purpose of their registration provided they fulfil all the conditions laid down in the imc (amendment) act, 2001. in other words, the qualification obtained by them must be a qualification recognised for enrolment as medical practitioner in the country in which the institution ..... all persons who applied for registration to mci prior to 15-3-2001 shall be dealt with according to the provisions of the act as existing prior to the commencement of the imc (amendment) act, 2001 subject to the following: (i) those students who obtained degrees where the total duration of study in recognised institutions is ..... problem of students who had undergone training/studies and had spent years to obtain degrees. the supreme court also noticed that section 13 of the indian medical council act, 1956 had been amended to deal with the situation that had arisen w.e.f. 18th february, 2002, new regulations had been sent for being published in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

..... in invoking the original jurisdiction of the high court of delhi and second, the impugned amendment act infringes the jurisdiction of the high court in framing rules under the scheme of the indian arbitration act, 1940 and the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.893. let us now examine this contention. it is relevant to mention that ..... by us) 140. placing reliance on the above, it is argued by mr. chandhiok that given the repugnancy between the court fees act, 1870 and the delhi court fees (amendment) act, 2012, the amendment act of 2012 is deemed to be still born and of no legal consequence and effect.141. on these aspects, another judicial precedent sheds ..... to the bill passed by the maharashtra legislative council and the maharashtra legislative assembly extending the duration of the bombay rent act for 5 years from 1st april, 1986. xxx xxx xxx a telegraphic message dated 25th february, 1986 sent by the special commissioner, new delhi, addressed to two secretaries of the state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi an ...

Court : Delhi

..... in invoking the original jurisdiction of the high court of delhi and second, the impugned amendment act infringes the jurisdiction of the high court in framing rules under the scheme of the indian arbitration act, 1940 and the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.893. let us now examine this contention. it is relevant to mention that ..... by us) 140. placing reliance on the above, it is argued by mr. chandhiok that given the repugnancy between the court fees act, 1870 and the delhi court fees (amendment) act, 2012, the amendment act of 2012 is deemed to be still born and of no legal consequence and effect.141. on these aspects, another judicial precedent sheds ..... to the bill passed by the maharashtra legislative council and the maharashtra legislative assembly extending the duration of the bombay rent act for 5 years from 1st april, 1986. xxx xxx xxx a telegraphic message dated 25th february, 1986 sent by the special commissioner, new delhi, addressed to two secretaries of the state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2013 (HC)

Rohit Naresh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

..... in 2001 and 2002. sub sections (4a) and (4b) to section 13 and clause (ma) to section 33 were introduced by the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001 are reproduced as under:"13. recognition of medical qualifications granted by certain medical institutions whose qualifications are not included in the first or second ..... at hand, changes in the legislative framework were necessary and accordingly necessary steps were taken to amend section 13 of the act and the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001 was enacted. by virtue of the said enactment, section 13 of the act was amended to include subsections (4a) & (4b).21. subsequently, the mci also submitted "the ..... acquired the medical qualification from foreign medical institution or has obtained admission in foreign medical institution before the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001 shall not be required to obtain eligibility certificate under this sub-section but, if he is qualified for admission to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2013 (HC)

Amarlapudi Ramesh Vs. National Board of Examination and anr

Court : Delhi

..... in 2001 and 2002. sub sections (4a) and (4b) to section 13 and clause (ma) to section 33 were introduced by the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001 are reproduced as under:"13. recognition of medical qualifications granted by certain medical institutions whose qualifications are not included in the first or second ..... at hand, changes in the legislative framework were necessary and accordingly necessary steps were taken to amend section 13 of the act and the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001 was enacted. by virtue of the said enactment, section 13 of the act was amended to include subsections (4a) & (4b).21. subsequently, the mci also submitted "the ..... acquired the medical qualification from foreign medical institution or has obtained admission in foreign medical institution before the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001 shall not be required to obtain eligibility certificate under this sub-section but, if he is qualified for admission to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //