Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... an arbitral agreement came in different way before the supreme court in the context of interpretation of section 89 of civil procedure code. the section brought in important amendment through act of 2002 as adr technique that includes arbitration. the supreme court held in afcons infrastructure limited and another vs. cherian varkey construction company private limited and ..... several complaints pending and parties were alleging serious offences under sections 108, 109, 191, 192, 420, 463, 464, 465, 468, 471 and 120-b ipc as the records show, the court appeared to have suggested and parties appeared to have accepted that they should resolve the disputes by an arbitral process. on 10 ..... 10.12.1998, fir no.36 dated 16.03.1999, all registered at the police station, kharar. two calendar cases had been registered under sections 182 ipc by the police officials of district roopnagar. all these criminal complaints had been registered at the instance of h.s. mann against the gill family. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... objectors. thereafter the state government found the objections to the scheme to be devoid of substance. in the challenge to the amendment and the scheme published, the supreme court held that under the act and rules framed therein, the state government was to consider the objections, but the secretary who has given the hearing ..... the decision making process, they quash their own administrative decisions in exercise of their power of judicial review and thus maintain the majesty and independence of the indian judiciary in which the people have always reposed tremendous faith. in the instant case, however, the order of compulsory retirement dated 02.08.1997 passed ..... decision making process, yet they quash their own administrative decisions in exercise of their power of judicial review and thus maintain the majesty and independence of the indian judiciary. the relevant observations are as under: 2. the recommendation of the high court on the basis of which the appellant, who held the rank of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... the court may for adequate and special reasons to be mentioned in the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than seven years.after amendment of section 376 ipc by act no.13 of 2013 the proviso to section 376 has been omitted. however, as already noticed the unamended provisions would apply to the present case. learned counsel ..... was recovered on 04.07.2003 which was much earlier to the notification of 18.11.2009. therefore, the position as it stood earlier to the amendment effected to sections 375 and 376 ipc by act no.13 of 2013 would apply as the offence attributed to the appellant had been committed during the period from 13.5.2008 to 28.5. ..... 2008 before the amendments to sections 375 and 376 ipc providing for more stringent punishments became effective from 3.2.2013. ms.g.k. mann, advocate for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... were prejudicially affected when ist date of specific performance of contract ex. p1 came to existence, but other party did not turn up. this is what article 54 of indian limitation act says. similarly law was laid down by hon'ble high court in case bhagwan singh versus teja singh (supra) to the effect that period of limitation of 3 years ..... are deposing with respect to the agreement dated 30.5.1992 and later on vide order dated 19.7.2007 the amendment was sought that the agreement dated 30.5.92 be substituted as 30.5.1990 but after amendment no fresh evidence was given and as such contradictory evidence is there as vide order dated 19.4.2007 permission for ..... for agreement dated 30.5.1992 whereas no agreement dated 30.5.1992 could be proved and similarly after seeking amendment neither the existence of agreement dated 30.5.1992 nor the agreement dated 30.5.1990 introduced by way of amendment, could be proved. the defendants no.l to 3, are from one and the same family and according to .....
Tag this Judgment!