Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 10,544 results (0.203 seconds)

Shahdara (Delhi) Saharanpur Light Railway Co. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1747; [1967]3SCR243

..... . the next enactment to be referred to is the indian railway companies act, 1895 (act x of 1895), which provided for the payment, by railway companies, registered under the indian companies act, 1882, of interest out of capital during construction. section 2(1) defines 'railway' as meaning a railway as defined in s. 3, clause (4) of the railways act. section 3 provided for a railway company paying interest on its paid-up share capital, out ..... in that section. there are other consequential provisions, in this act. 15. the indian tramways act, 1902 (act iv of 1902) was one to apply the provisions of the indian railway companies act, 1895, to certain tramway companies. the preamble to this act iv of 1902, stated that it was expedient to apply the provisions of the indian railway companies act, 1895, to companies formed for the construction of tramways 'not differing in structure and .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : II(1997)ACC589; 1998ACJ342; JT1997(8)SC653; 1997(2)KLT986(SC); (1998)118PLR248; 1997(6)SCALE497; (1997)8SCC683; [1997]Supp4SCR643; 1997(2)LC827(SC)

..... only confers a power on the central government of issue a requisition to the railway administration, i.e. the general managers or the railway companies (if any) to ..... . v. tara prasad) : air1928cal504 , the direct obligation cast on the railway by section 21 of the act 18 of 1954 was repealed later by act 25 of 1871. to this extent, the indian statute therefore differs from the english statute. under section 13 of the railways act, 1890 no such duties are imposed directly on the railway administration by the statute. the section on the other hand .....

Superintendent and Legal Remembrancer, State of West Bengal Vs. Corpor ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC997; 1967CriLJ950; [1967]2SCR170

..... case. the court held that as the crown is not, either expressly or by implication, bound by the indian companies' act (x of 1866), and as an order made under that act for the winding up of a company does not work any alteration of property against which execution is sought, such an order does not enable the court ..... civil procedure (old), s. 212 (proviso) of the indian companies act, s. 20 (proviso) of the sea customs act, 1878, s. 1(4)(i) of the indian ports act, s. 3, proviso (1) of the indian stamps act, 1899, and s. 3 of the india act xi of 1881 etc. what is more, act xi of 1881 empowered the governor-general in council by ..... into many trading activities, e.g. to effectuate control of prices, prevent hoarding and distribute commodities in short supply, besides maintenance of departments like posts, telegraphs, railways, telephones etc., activities which may have been regarded as -trading activities in the past. but if initiation and completion of schemes for social welfare of the people .....

Northern Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the railroad and railway companies, or of their respective vendees, other than as the lands fall within or without the reservation. if they were within the boundaries of the reservation, they were lands of the indians; otherwise, public lands of the united states, and passed to the companies, respectively, under the act of congress and the ..... railway company, for certain described lands. the foundation of the bill is that the patents were issued by mistake as public lands granted to the railroad company under the act of congress dated july 2, 1864 (13 stat. 365, c. 217), the lands actually being, it is alleged by the government, part of the yakima indian reservation ..... states v. winans, supra. it is contended that the northern pacific railway company and the individual appellants are bona fide purchasers, and, as such, entitled to protection under the act of march 2, 1896 (29 stat. 42, c. 39). section 1 of that act provides that suits brought by the united states to vacate and annul any .....

Khalsa University Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and against the general law of the land as laid down in the indian companies act, in regard to the administration and management of the affairs of one company in 22 indian territory. the act itself gives no reason for the legislation but the ordinance, which was a precursor of the act, expressly stated why the legislation was necessary. it said that owing to ..... of individuals, one corporation or a class of corporations, and visits a penalty upon them which is not imposed upon others guilty of like delinquency [gulf, colorado and santa fe railway co. v. ellis, 41 l ed 666 :165. us150at 159 (1897) :1897. scc online us sc20 . (l ed p. 669 : us p.159) the legislature undoubtedly has ..... . us356at p. 369 (1886) :1886. scc online us sc188 (l ed p. 226), and this means subjection to equal laws applying alike to all in the same situation [southern railway co. v. greene, 54 l ed 536 :216. us400at p. 412 (1910) :1910. scc21online us sc59 (l ed p. 539). in other words, there should be no discrimination .....

Cbi Bs And Fc Mumbai Vs. Manojdev Gokulchand Seksaria

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (sic.) and alleged commission of offences under sections 120-b r/w 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the ipc and under sections 13(2) r/w 13(l)(d) of the pc act, 1988 and under section 68-a of the companies act, 1956 filed a writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india read with 7 section 482 of the ..... against 16 accused persons including the first respondent under section 120-b read with 420, 467, 468 and 471 of ipc and section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 and section 68-a of the companies act, 1956. similarly, a supplementary chargesheet was also filed in criminal case rc3/e/2006/bs&fc/mumbai which was ..... including the first respondent herein for offences punishable under section 120-b read with 420, 467, 468 and 471 of ipc and section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 and section 68-a of the companies act, 1956. a supplementary chargesheet was also filed in criminal case no.rc4/e/2006/bs&fc mumbai which was .....

Jalaluddin Khan Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... j.factual aspects1 the appellant is being prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 121, 121a and 122 of the indian penal code (for short, the ipc ) and sections 13, 18, 18a and 20 of the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967 (for short, the uapa ). a charge sheet was filed on 7th january 2023. he is shown ..... taking the charge sheet as correct, it is not possible to record a prima facie finding that the appellant knowingly facilitated the commission or preparation of terrorist acts by letting out the first floor premises. again, there is no allegation in the charge sheet against the appellant that he organised any camps to impart training ..... reads thus: 2 definitions. (o) unlawful activity , in relation to an individual or association, means any action taken by such individual or association (whether by committing an act or by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representation or otherwise), (i) which is intended, or supports any claim, to bring about, .....

Amit Rana @ Koka Vs. The State Of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of punishment more than what is prescribed under the first part thereof. we have already noted that the maximum imprisonment permissible under the first part of section 307, ipc, is imprisonment of either description for a term which may not extent to 10 years and also fine . when in unambiguous terms the legislature prescribed the maximum ..... nature as would have caused death in the usual course of an event, but something beyond his control prevented that result, his act would constitute the offence punishable as an attempt to murder under section 307, ipc.7. now we will refer to the incident in question which led to the conviction of the appellants under section 307 ..... description, beyond the period of ten years. it is worthwhile to extract section 307, ipc for a proper consideration of the aforesaid question. it reads thus:- page 2 of 9 slp (crl.) no.14705 of 2023 307. attempt to murder. whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances that, if he by that .....

The Excise Commissioner, Karnataka Vs. Mysore Sales International Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... seller has been defined to mean the central government, a state government or any local authority or corporation or authority established by or under a central, state or provincial act or any company or firm or cooperative society. 14.5. adverting to the definition of buyer , explanation (a) says that a person who obtains in any sale by way of ..... is stored, blended, matured, fortified, diluted or flavoured to produce arrack and also a place for bottling such arrack, but does not include a manufactory where wine or indian liquor, beer or toddy is manufactured. 12.1. as per rule 3(1), a licence may be granted by the excise commissioner for the manufacture and bottling of ..... of both; or (b) of selling by wholesale or by retail; or (c) of manufacturing or supplying by wholesale, or of both and of selling by retail, any indian liquor or intoxicating drug within any specified area. 199.2. though sub-section (1a) provides that no lease granted under sub-section (1) shall be transferred, the proviso .....

Chief Secretary Govt. Of Odisha Vs. Bharat Process And Mechnical Engin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... high court at calcutta in accordance with the law. the workmen and tgp will be entitled to raise all pleas and contentions as are available in terms of the companies act, 1956 for payment and enforcement of their dues, as alleged, in accordance with law.40. in the facts of the case, there will be no order as ..... workers' dues in the aforesaid factual background, does not merit an order of the nature as sought by tgp. the workers will be paid in terms of the companies act, 1956.37. having considered all aspects of the matter, it is evident to us that entertaining any notion of lease renewal would be an exercise in futility, ..... continue the mining activities. bpmel itself never undertook any winning or mining activities from the three mines. on liquidation of the holding company, bpmel, the power of attorney stood terminated, per section 20120 of the indian contract act, 1872. moreover, omdc, a subsidiary of bpmel, is a separate juristic entity. the plea that the juristic entity should be .....