Court : Chennai Madurai
..... to the very jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain and decide such suit. the order has been passed by the delhi sales tax authorities and admittedly the plaintiff-company is an assessee before that authority for the purpose of sales tax. it does not stand to reason that such orders could be assailed before the learned senior sub- ..... of any assessment made, or to be made, or in respect of any action taken, or to be taken, in pursuance of any of the provisions of this act. the act provides complete machinery for adjudication as well as recovery and when there is a specific bar, the appellant has no right to file a suit in the civil court and ..... the grievance relates to the rate or quantum of tax or the principle of assessment. the act further provides a particular forum and a specific mode of having this remedy which is analogous to that provided in section 66(2) of the indian income tax act, 1922. section 86 forbids in clear terms the person aggrieved by an assessment from seeking his .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... from independent sources on material particulars. but, at the same time, if the evidence of a solitary witness is shrouded with doubts, it would not be prudent to act upon the evidence of such witness in the absence of corroboration from independent sources. we are also conscious of the legal position that the principle of 'falsus in uno ..... falsus in omni bus' has not been recognized by indian courts. in the indian scenerio, if the court is able to separate the grain from the chaff, there can be no difficulty in acting upon the grain. but, in the instant case, as we have already narrated, the evidence of p. ..... sessions judge, fast track court no.iii, madurai. the trial court framed charges under sections 342 and 304(ii) ipc against all the accused, in addition, section 325 ipc against the 1st accused and 325 read with section 34 ipc(2 counts) against the accused nos.2 to 8 and lastly under section 354 ipcagainst the accused 6 to 9. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... on such use and disclosure thereof, is also provided for. 32. one of the grievances nurtured by the petitioner is that the credit information companies act in uni-direction and that they are non-responsive to the pleas for updating the information. such a contention is developed without regard being had ..... the issues of 'credit information bureau (india) limited' score ratings and suspend the issued certificate of registration to foreign companies and to grant certificate of registration to any indian companies for collection and maintenance of individual credit and personal data to protect the personal liberty on privacy and also pass all ..... 3 to rectify the 'credit information bureau (india) limited' score ratings and suspend the certificates of registration issued to foreign companies and to grant certificate of registration to indian companies for collection and maintenance of individual credit and personal data to protect the personal liberty and privacy of the citizens of this .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... time. such view of the learned principal district judge, tuticorin, is erroneous. only after considering the entitlement to deduct the period as mentioned in section 14 of limitation act, 1963, the limitation issue has to be decided. after such consideration, in case the setting aside applications are in time, then the learned principal district judge, tuticorin, ..... as required in condition 44.2 of the contract in the context of admission of compensation events in ext.c 12 itself, is totally unjustified. the engineer acted erroneously and beyond authority conferred on him by the contract. the work was not completed within the intended completion date exclusively due to fundamental breaches committed by ..... it was held that a court can set aside an award under section 34(2)(b)(ii) of the act, as being in conflict with the public policy of india, if it is (a) contrary to the fundamental policy of indian law; or (b) contrary to the interests of india; or (c) contrary to justice or morality; or .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... investigation is to be conducted against the above said other accused and i alter the sections of law to 420, 467, 471 ipc and 8(c) r/w.20(b)(ii)(c) 25 and 29 of ndps act." 15. the investigating officer submitted a further report to the special court on 11.12.2008 and requested the court to refer ..... c.c.no.379/2006 against the accused 1.anumohan, a-2.ajaykumar and a-3.sarun pending before the spl. dist. and sessions judge court for e.c. act and ndps act cases at madurai is referred as "false case" and the final report is submitted. the r.c.s. notice served on the complainant is also enclosed herewith. it ..... respondents were permitted to retire peacefully, in spite of pendency of criminal proceedings. 18. the government very clearly admitted that the fourth and fifth respondents exceeded their limit and acted beyond the scope of their legal duties. 19. the counter-affidavit filed by the government and the report submitted by the cbcid, tuticorin district, to the jurisdictional court clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... circumstances, an alternative remedy does not operate as a bar. (see: whirpool corporation vs. registrar of trade marks [(1998) 8 scc 1], harbanslal sahnia and anr. vs. indian oil corporation ltd. [(2003) 2 scc 107] and ors. , state of h.p. vs. gujarat ambuja cement ltd. [(2005) 6 scc 499] and sanjana m. ..... fact, the complaints of the executive officer and two officials were not furnished to the petitioners or provided to them. even though, section 26 of the act, empowers the second respondent/joint commissioner, hindu religious and charitable endowments department, madurai, to supersede the trustee, if a hereditary trustee has suffered any of the ..... their explanations/objections (including objection as to the jurisdiction of the second respondent) to hold enquiry. the documents, which were required by the trustees under the rti act are relating to enquiry. as such, a reply was given that those documents shall be furnished after completion of enquiry. the other informations were furnished as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... district judge (pcr), madurai, to thiru.balamurugan, who was an accused in crime no.1273 of 2013 under the provisions of the indian penal code and the explosive substances act was taken as a ground to state that there is a possibility of the detenus enlarged on bail. in short, the case of ..... according to the commissioner of police, the petitioner was involved in a case in crime no.74 of 2016 registered under the provisions of the indian penal code and explosive substances act on 09 january, 2016. the confession of the accused pasumponpandian was taken as the material to implicate the petitioner. subsequently, there was another ..... petitioners in all these habeas corpus petitions took identical contentions to demonstrate that the detaining authority mechanically passed the detention orders and it was a pre-determined act in collusion with the minister for co-operation, who is inimically indisposed against thiru.pasumponpandian, who was the west area secretary in-charge of aiadmk party. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... for dismissal of the second appeal. 17. at this juncture, the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that as per section 60(b) of the indian easements act, the revocation of licence is only during the currency of licence, not after the licence period is over. here, the licence period is over and hence, the ..... 1. but in ex.a.1, it was stated as franchise. so as per concise oxford english dictionary, a franchise is an authorisation granted by a government or company to an individual group enabling them to carryout specified commercial activities ; as per collins cobuild advanced illustrated dictionary, a franchise is an authority that is given by an ..... of clause (1) of the said indenture the licensee was to have the use of a piece of land for maintaining a depot for petroleum goods received through railways but thereby his rights to deal with the property and the goods brought thereon had not been taken away. clearly, an embargo has been placed as regards the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... e). further the title of the lands is not in the name of the trust or college as the lands are owned by a private limited under the companies act 1956 viz. lotus gardens private limited, bangalore and therefore the trust/college does not possess the absolute title of the lands. besides when this major deficiency was ..... council, the students who have already been admitted will be seriously prejudiced. it has been prayed on behalf of the students also that the medical council of indian should be directed to grant recognition to the college set up by the trust. 4. as inspection was carried out by the medical council on the ..... the conditions of the university, the trust had signed the memorandum of understanding with the university on 7.7.2010. further neither in the tamilnadu agricultural university act 1971 nor statutes of the tamilnadu agriculture university nor its regulations nor in the hand book of guidelines for establishing agricultural college, anything is stated pertaining to the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... , sivagangai district, in law, cannot pass the impugned order dated 14.10.2015 in memo no.19/15, as there is no provision either under the indian registration act, 1908 or under the indian stamp act, 1899, refusing permission to register the document in the subject matter in issue, the learned counsel for the petitioner cites a division bench order of this court ..... owners in the above two villages from transferring their lands either by way of sale or by any other mode to any third party other than m/s.cuddalore power company limited and refuse to register such documents. 12. under article 300-a of the constitution, a right of a citizen to own a property and retain the same ..... in o.s.no.448 of 1967, passed by the trial court, has become final, conclusive and binding between the parties inter se, as per section 43 of the indian evidence act, 1872, this court is of the considered view that the impugned order dated 14.10.2015 in memo no.19/15, issued by the 3rd respondent/tahsildar, karaikudi, .....
Tag this Judgment!