Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: mumbai Page 100 of about 8,876 results (0.049 seconds)

Sau. Dwaribai Nanakram Jivatramani Vs. Rahul Trading Company and Anoth ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... tax consultant who also signed the documents, but no compliance was made by the complainant so far as section 65b of the indian evidence act is concerned. section 65(b)(4) of the indian evidence act, 1872 reads under: in any proceedings where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, ..... legally existing liability. 4. the complainant despite reply chose to file complaint against the accused alleging commission of offence punishable under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act. on behalf of the complainant mr.mukesh nanakram jivatramani, power of attorney holder had filed an affifdavit, dt.7.1.2008 claiming that he is writing ..... 17.11.2008 in summary criminal case no.87 of 2005 whereby the respondent/accused was acquitted of the offence punishable under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act. 2. the learned advocate for the appellant (original complainant) submitted that the accused used to purchase goods on credit from the proprietary firm of the .....

The Police Inspector, Central Bureau of Investigation and Another Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... informing that the matter is transferred to director general of police, goa, for action. the accused have violated the provisions of the indian citizenship act, 1955, indian passport act and the prevention of corruption act. offences committed by them are serious in nature and therefore, direction should be given to the petitioner no.1 cbi or nia to ..... the mlas, mps, other public servants and others alleging that they are holding public offices although they are foreign nationals or have lost their indian citizenship. it is alleged that indian citizenship act, 1955, does not allow for dual citizenship, that the accused has acquired portuguese citizenship although they are holding high public offices like police ..... investigation in a private complaint case under section 13(2) read with s. 13(1)(d) of prevention of corruption act, 1988, and sections 120-b, 467, 468, 471, 471(a), 211 of ipc, was set aside by the gujarat high court on the ground that the special judge had no such power to direct .....

Thakur Jagannath Baksh Singh Vs. Secretary of State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1946)48BOMLR467

..... atiqa begum [1941] f. l. j. 97 ' that within their own sphere the powers of the indian legislatures are as large and ample as those of parliament itself.' it is many centuries since the courts were invited to hold that an act of parliament was ultra vires or invalid in law on the ground that it infringed the prerogative of ..... its prerogative it makes a grant of land within the territory over which such legislative authority exists. so the proposition is stated by luxmoore j. in the north charterland exploration company (1910) ld. v. the king [1931] 1 ch. 169. in that case the crown which made the grant was also the supreme legislative authority in the protectorate, ..... by it in an inferior position to that occupied by other owners of land within the same protectorate.no principle relevant to this case can be extracted from burrard power company, ltd. v. the king [1911] a. c. 87 where it was held that the legislative competence there in question belonged to the dominion of canada, not to .....

Shankarappa Kotrabasappa Harpanhalli Vs. Khatumbi Jamaluddinsab

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1932Bom478; (1932)34BOMLR991

..... of this statement the learned lord justice referred to glegg v. bromley [1912] 3 k. b. 474 dawson v. great northern and city railway [1905] 1 k. b. 260 and dickinson v. burrell (i860) l.r. 1 eq. 337 all these cases emphasize the distinction between ..... attached to it, and upheld the validity of the latter. warrington l.j.also took the same view.6. turning to the indian cases, i find that the game view is taken by at least three of our high courts, in monmatha nath dutt v. matilal ..... what was purchased was a right to sue for compensation and that this cannot be transferred. undersection 6, clause (e), t.p. act, the prohibition is against the transfer of a mere right to sue. the word 'more' implies that the transferee acquires no interest ..... mesne profits were in the nature of damages, the whole transaction was void under section 6(e) of the transfer of property act. he found that the consideration paid by the plaintiff was a single consideration for both land and the right to mesne profits, .....

M.R. Joshi (H.U.F.) Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Poona

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1979]118ITR11(Bom)

..... . in an appeal preferred by the assessee, the aac reversed the decision of the ito. according to him, the ito misconstrued the provisions of s. 24(2) of the indian i.t. act, 1922. if the assessee suffered loss from the business of film exhibition in one firm and derived profit from film exhibition in another firm, the source, viz., the film ..... business in which the losses were incurred in the assessment years 1955-6 and 1956-57. the tribunal held that a firm is a taxable unit under the i.t. act and the question whether the two firms carry on the same business would depend on the facts of the case. the tribunal pointed out that the two firms in which ..... 1955-56 which after adjustment against his other income for that year came to rs. 24,532. this amount he claimed to set off under s. of the i.t. act, 1922, as amended in 1955, against his share of the income from firm b for the assessment year 1956-57. the contention urged by the assessee in the case was .....

Chimanlal Dipchand Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1954Bom397; (1954)56BOMLR321; ILR1954Bom1278

..... at p. 404:'....on a consideration of all these decisions i have no hesitation in holding that as regards constitutionality of the delegation of legislative powers the indian legislature cannot be in the same position as the omnipotent british parliament. ....this is not warranted by the provisions of the constitution and the legitimacy of ..... we are referring is -- 'state of bihar v. sir kameshwar singh : [1952]1scr889 . in that case what was challenged was the bihar land reforms act and that act provided for compensation to be paid to landlords and the compensation was payable partly in cash and partly in bonds. the compensation was to be paid in 40 ..... its structural foundation, the maxim 'delegatus non protest delegare' could have no constitutional status but could only have the force of a political precept to be acted upon by legislatures in a democratic polity consisting of elected representatives of the people in the discharge of their function of making laws, but cannot be enforced .....

In Re: Ganeshdas Panalal

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR1093

..... receiver, that this court has no jurisdiction to make any such order. for the official assignee, it is contended, to put it shortly, that the indian insolvency act extends to the whole of india, that any high court judge empowered to preside as commissioner of insolvency, has therefore, provided the insolvency occurred within the territorial ..... where asserted in argument before, that the jurisdiction either of the old supreme court or of a judge of the high court empowered under the insolvent debtors ' act, was locally unlimited in respect, for example, of pursuing the property into other and foreign jurisdictions. taking the case of gowasji ookerji to have been rightly ..... proposition, that the court here being once properly vested with jurisdiction, in an insolvency matter, necessarily has the powar to make any further orders which the act authorizes, to take effect anywhere outside the limits of the court's local jurisdiction. as to the surface objection that any such orders if made would .....

Gangaram Ganpati Bhopale Vs. Laxman Ganoba Shet

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1916Bom95; 37Ind.Cas.360

..... 3, a trustee for the defendant of the land purchased by him: see illustration (g). section 91 of the indian trusts act affirms the some rule as the specific relief act. the legislature has herein adopted the jaw applied in the cases of daniels v. davison (1809) 16 ves. 249 : 10 r.r. 7 : 33 b.r. 978 and potter v. ..... has no greater knowledge than the vendor possessed.6. it may be necessary hereafter, when a suitable occasion arises, to consider in a full bench, whether the transfer of property act necessarily involves such inconsistent positions. the facts of the present case do not raise the question decided in lalchand motiram v. lakshaman sahadu (6). when the question does arise for ..... .a. 46 : 5 c.w.n. 217 : 7 sar. p.c.j. 811 and the words 'of itself' in the last clause of section 54 of the transfer of property act, to which attention was called by sir lawrence jenkins in karalia nanubhai v. mansukhram 24 b. 400 : 2 bom. l.r. 220 : 12 ind. dec. 799, will doubtless be considered .....

Joharmal Ramkaran Vs. Laxmandas Shivlal

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1934Bom467; (1934)36BOMLR983

..... name is to be treated as if the single proprietor so trading constituted a firm for the purpose of order xxx, although under the definition of a firm under the indian contract act there can be no firm unless there are at least two partners. if the case of a single proprietor is to be treated as a firm for the purpose .....

The Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. and Another Vs. the S ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1992)94BOMLR230

..... section 15a-i of the bombay sales tax act, 1959. petitioner no. 1 is a company registered under the indian companies act, 1913 and carries on business of manufacture of commercial vehicles. the company is a registered dealer, both under the bombay sales tax act, 1959 and the central sales tax act, 1956. 2. section 3 of the act deals with incidence of tax, and, inter ..... set-off under the act and the rules. we make it clear that this computation should be undertaken only in cases where ..... required to be granted in view of our interpretation of provisions of section 15a-i of the act as amended in the year 1984. the only relief the petitioners are entitled to is that the returns filed by the company shall be finalised by computing additional tax on the net amount of tax payable after adjustment of .....