Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: gujarat Page 1 of about 1,416 results (0.046 seconds)

ionik Metallics and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Gujarat

..... )--5.pfc ltd. (power finance corporation ltd.)pfc [it is a pfi u/s 4a of the companies act]sixmonths6.rec ltd. (rural electrification corporation ltd.)rec [it is a pfi u/s 4a of the companies act]six months7.irfc ltd. (indian railway finance corporation )not rbi [as per rbi report]-8.ireda ltd. (as on 31.3.2002not rbi [as per ..... rbi report]--9.nedfi ltd.(north eastern development finance corporation ltd. )not rbi ( as per rbi report )--10.hudco ltd.nhb 11.uti ( unit trust of india )sebi 12.lic (life insurance corp.)irda established under the irda act, 1999 ..... of fixation of norms/guidelines for npa when the others coming within the purview of clause (b) are also guided by the some other statutes, for instance, banking regulation act, companies act etc. 44. lastly, in the case of m/s holystar natural resources pvt. ltd. and anr vs. union of india and anr reported in air 2014 del 60, .....

In Re: Shri Ambica Mills Ltd., Ex Parte Jaykrishna Harivallabhdas and ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1986]59CompCas368(Guj)

..... on record. - the present three applicants are the managing director of shri ambica mills ltd., a public limited company earlier registered under the indian companies act, 1913, and then governed by the provisions of the companies will mention ambica mills ltd. as petitioning company which had filed company petition no. 49 of 1978 before this court; while the three applicants will be referred to as the managing ..... directors of the company or managing directors for short. 4. by way of company petition no. 49 of 1978, the petitioning company moved .....

Pushpaben Jitendrakumar Shah and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : II(2005)ACC185; 2005ACJ191; AIR2004Guj370; (2004)3GLR2206

..... (1901) a.c. 396, was cited for the proposition that there was no obligation on the part of the railway to carry the passengers safely. in that case, the respondent had sued to recover ..... done under section 109 of the act, had a good deal of force, but it was of no avail to the plaintiff, because, the assistant station master had deposed that the vehicle could easily accommodate 45 persons and was not overcrowded.[b] the decision of the privy council in east indian railway company v. kalidas mukerjee, reported in ..... that the compartments should not be overcrowded. he submitted that, under section 63 of the indian railways act, 1890 (which was applicable in the instant case, since the accident occurred prior to the coming into force of the railways act, 1989), the railway administration was bound to fix and display the maximum number of passengers that may be .....

Raichand Amulakh Shah and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Representi ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1963)4GLR662

..... been unlawfully charged. it is contended by the learned counsel for the railway that demurrage and wharfage are charged in view of section 47(1)(f) of the indian railways act. section 47(1)(f) permits every railway company and in the case of a railway administered by the government an officer to be appointed by the central ..... wharfage means the charge levied on goods for not removing them from the railway premises after the expiry of the free time allowed for such removal.section 47(1) of the indian railways act reads as follows:every railway company and in the case of a railway administered by the government an officer to be appointed by the central ..... government in this behalf shall make general rules consistent with this act for the following purposes namely....sub-sec. (3) .....

Oil and Natural Gas Commission Vs. Balaram Cements Limited

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2001Guj287

..... present two appeals in a nutshell are as follows:6.1 on or about 5/1/1991, the original plaintiff balaram cements limited which is a compay incorporated under the indian companies act, has filed special civil suit no.2 of 1991 in the court of the learned civil judge (senior division) at palanpur against defendant no.1 -oil natural & gas ..... revised his offer, and therefore, it cannot be said that there is a concluded contract.20. shri dayani has argued that in view of sec. 5 of the indian contract act, 1872, a proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer but not afterwards and an acceptance may be ..... supply, though this was going to cost more to the plaintiff. plaintiff's offer was going to get expired on 30/11/1990. as per the position of indian contract act, if validity period of offer is not mutually extended by both the parties, then the offerer is within his legal rights to refuse to honour the acceptance subsequently. .....

Suhrid Geigy Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1980)2GLR424

..... foreign company but that no foreign company should hold share in the capital of the company registered under the companies act, 1956? clause (a) in explanation clearly con templates companies, incorporated in india under the companies act, 1956. the petitioner-company is one such company. except those which fall under the exception, all companies which are incorporated under the companies act, ..... us because the petitioner has not pleaded in the petition that ciba geigy limited is not a 'foreign company' within the meaning of sub-section (1) of section 591 of the companies act, 1956, because it has no place of business in india. whether it has a place of business ..... company that it should be struck down on the ground of vagueness.18. in municipal committee, amritsar and another etc. v. the state of punjab and ors. : [1969]3scr447 , the supreme court has observed that the rule that an act of a competent legislature may be 'struck down' by the courts on the ground of vagueness is alien to indian .....

The Textile Labour Association, Ahmedabad Vs. the Ahmedabad Mill Owner ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1974)ILLJ1Guj

..... wholly oblivious of the present day conditions and the necessity for increased production, particularly in the matter of utility companies and the companies that are producing goods for essential services like those carried on by the indian railways. thus court has observed on more than one occasion that it is generally accepted that there are too ..... the bombay award was also interpreted differently. unlike major units in bombay, in almost all major industrial establishments in gujarat privilege leave was granted under the indian factories act and the grant of the same was not considered by us desirable at that juncture as that would start a chain of reaction. we were, therefore ..... their household duties and to fulfill social and moral obligations towards their families. 2. reliance was also placed on the provisions of the shops and establishments act and other acts and the award of the industrial court, maharashtra in the year 1963 in reference (ic) no. 130 of 1961 (reported in 1964 icr p. .....

Union of India Vs. Vulcan Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1972Guj255

..... under section 80 of the civil procedure code as the railway failed to pay the said amount, it filed a suit to recover the ..... insurance company bombay in full and final settlement of their claim for non-delivery of the consignment and, therefore, they had no objection to their paying the amount of compensation to the said insurance company. the vulcan insurance company thereafter served a notice on the union of india under section 77 of the indian railways act and also ..... delivery under policy no. m-82465 issued by you on the undermentioned goods, we hereby assign transfer and abandon to you all our rights against the railway company-administration or other persons whatsoever, caused or arising by reason of the said damage or loss and grant you full power to take and use all .....

Mohanlal Ganpatram Vs. Shri Sayaji Jubilee Cotton and Jute Mills Co. L ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1964)0GLR804

..... the petitioners. the reasons are as follows : 29. prior to the enactment of the companies act, 1956, the statute relating to companies was the indian companies act, 1913. there was in the indian companies act, 1913, section 153c which corresponded to sections 397 and 398 of the companies act, 1956. this section was introduced in the indian companies act, 1913, by act lii of 1951 following the enactment of section 210 in the english ..... must be read in connection with them and interpreted by the light of them.' lord collins also said much to the same effect in toronto corporation v. toronto railway (1) [1907] a.c. 315, 324., when he observed : 'this clause is the last of the fasciculus, of which the heading is `track, & c., and ..... railways' and, as was held in hammersmith ry. co. v. brand (2) (1869) l.r. 4 h.l. 171., such a heading is to be regarded as giving the .....

Phirojshah Pestonji Contractor Vs. Ramnath Janarda, Prabhu and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1965)6GLR477

..... for an application under that section and since no period of limitation for such an application is provided by the first schedule to the limitation act the indian companies act 1913 is a special law providing for such an application a period of limitation different from the period of limitation provided therefor by the ..... see how any analogy can be drawn between section 9(1)(c) of the provincial insolvency act and section 235 of the indian companies act 1913 under section 235 of the indian companies act 1913 the rights and liabilities created by acts of misapplication retainer misfeasance or breach of trust continue to exist irrespective of the fact whether proceedings ..... the question which arises in these appeals is a narrow one namely whether section 18 of the limitation act applies to an application under section 235 of the indian companies act 1913 section 235 of the indian companies act 1913 requires an application under that section to be made within three years from the date of the .....