Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Court: karnataka Page 5 of about 15,269 results (0.139 seconds)

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Mr. Dr. G Sai Abilash Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... in the state concerned. 217 11.2. the mci regulations, 2000 are framed by mci in exercise of its powers conferred under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. the indian medical council act, 1956 has been enacted/passed by the union in exercise of powers conferred under list i entry 66. therefore, the main source of power of mci ..... committed an error in holding that the teachers became entitled to the benefit of the statute relating to time-bound promotion scheme, when the said statute made by the board of management was assented to by the chancellor even though it was not published in the gazette. the high court also committed an error in observing that the non- ..... be duly published in the official gazette, (2) it should be offered for sale on the date of its issue by the directorate of publicity and public relations of the board, new delhi. in the present case, admittedly, the second condition was not satisfied inasmuch as it was offered for sale only on 6-8-2001, as it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Dr Niharika H S Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... in the state concerned. 217 11.2. the mci regulations, 2000 are framed by mci in exercise of its powers conferred under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. the indian medical council act, 1956 has been enacted/passed by the union in exercise of powers conferred under list i entry 66. therefore, the main source of power of mci ..... committed an error in holding that the teachers became entitled to the benefit of the statute relating to time-bound promotion scheme, when the said statute made by the board of management was assented to by the chancellor even though it was not published in the gazette. the high court also committed an error in observing that the non- ..... be duly published in the official gazette, (2) it should be offered for sale on the date of its issue by the directorate of publicity and public relations of the board, new delhi. in the present case, admittedly, the second condition was not satisfied inasmuch as it was offered for sale only on 6-8-2001, as it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Mr.kushal B.r. Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... in the state concerned. 217 11.2. the mci regulations, 2000 are framed by mci in exercise of its powers conferred under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. the indian medical council act, 1956 has been enacted/passed by the union in exercise of powers conferred under list i entry 66. therefore, the main source of power of mci ..... committed an error in holding that the teachers became entitled to the benefit of the statute relating to time-bound promotion scheme, when the said statute made by the board of management was assented to by the chancellor even though it was not published in the gazette. the high court also committed an error in observing that the non- ..... be duly published in the official gazette, (2) it should be offered for sale on the date of its issue by the directorate of publicity and public relations of the board, new delhi. in the present case, admittedly, the second condition was not satisfied inasmuch as it was offered for sale only on 6-8-2001, as it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Ananya Anantharaman Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... in the state concerned. 217 11.2. the mci regulations, 2000 are framed by mci in exercise of its powers conferred under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. the indian medical council act, 1956 has been enacted/passed by the union in exercise of powers conferred under list i entry 66. therefore, the main source of power of mci ..... committed an error in holding that the teachers became entitled to the benefit of the statute relating to time-bound promotion scheme, when the said statute made by the board of management was assented to by the chancellor even though it was not published in the gazette. the high court also committed an error in observing that the non- ..... be duly published in the official gazette, (2) it should be offered for sale on the date of its issue by the directorate of publicity and public relations of the board, new delhi. in the present case, admittedly, the second condition was not satisfied inasmuch as it was offered for sale only on 6-8-2001, as it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1989 (HC)

M/S. Jagadale and Sons, Bangalore and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1990Kant251; ILR1990KAR101; 1990(1)KarLJ18

..... create a single licencee for the distribution of or wholesale dealing in the intoxicants in the state. 29. under sec. 17 of the act the exclusive right of supplying by wholesale any indian liqueur or intoxicating drug may be leased out. definition of india liquor as per sec. 2(15) read with sec. 2(18 ..... ) is quite wide. the concept of lease referred in sec. 17 has nothing to do with the provisions of the transfer of property act. whenever, any ..... (referred as 'the act', hereinafter). the rules, under challenge are:--(1) karnataka excise (distillery and warehouse) amendment rules, 1989; (2) karnataka excise (brewery) (amendment) rules, 1989; (3) karnataka excise (manufacture of wine from grapes) (amendment) rules, 1989; (4) karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) (amendment) rules, 1989; and (5) karnataka excise (bottling of liquor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 2003 (HC)

Mangalore Ganesh Beedi and Allied Beedi Factories Workers Association ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003(5)KarLJ26; (2003)IIILLJ861Kant

..... gazette calling for objections. on receipt of the objections the government would place draft notification and objections received before the advisory board constituted under section 7 of the act. the advisory board would deliberate on the materials placed before it and take into account all relevant facts and circumstances, if any, of the ..... a living wage. in the meanwhile, simultaneously with the appointment of the central pay commission the government of india introduced the minimum wages bill in the indian legislative assembly, on february 11, 1946, the bill was referred to the select committee in march 1947, which was reconstituted in november 1947. certain ..... fixation of proper wages.12. continued and unprecedented labour unrest in the year 1923 forced the government of india to appoint the royal commission on indian labour 'to enquire into and report in the existing conditions of labour in industrial undertakings and plantations in british india on the health, efficiency and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2003 (HC)

S.M. Rao and ors. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4678

..... line under, over, along or across, and posts in or upon, any immovable property. the power conferred on the board under section 51 of the indian electricity act, 1910 and section 10 of the indian telegraph act, 1885 is a species of 'eminent domain' power of the state. since the right to hold property is no longer ..... or irregular, that fact itself would not entitle the appellants- petitioners to seek mandamus to the board not to do right thing in conformity with the provisions of the indian electricity act, 1910, the supply act and the indian telegraph act, 1885.20. we find force in the contention of learned senior counsel. the revised scheme prepared ..... should conform to the postulates of article 14, viz., reasonableness, fairness and non-arbitrariness.27. the board is statutorily empowered by virtue of section 51 of the indian electricity act read with section 10 of the indian telegraph act, 1885 to supply energy to the public subject to such conditions and restrictions, if any, the central .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2009 (HC)

Mr. Aiman Ahamed Khan S/O. Dr. Shamshad A. Khan, Minor Represented by ...

Court : Karnataka

..... peetha case and the conditions enumerated in the notification are void-abinitio in law and opposed to the public policy as stated under section 23 of the indian contract act 1872 in support of the above legal submissions, he has placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in central inland water transport corporation limited ..... the conditions incorporated in the notification regarding seat sharing of 25% is opposed to section 23 of the indian contract act of 1872, and the law laid down by the apex court in the cases of central inland board and dtc referred to supra, in support of his legal submission that the terms and conditions incorporated in ..... state legislature. it is not in dispute that up till now parliament, by any legislative exercise either by separate legislation or by amending the indian medical council act, 1956 has to legislated about the controlling of admissions of students to higher medical education courses in the country. therefore, the only question remains whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2019 (HC)

Hassan Thermal Power Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... 59 deals with savings reads as under:-"(1) notwithstanding anything contained in this act, the powers, rights and functions of the regional electricity board, the central electricity authority, the central government and authorities other the state electricity board and the state government under the indian electricity act, 1910 or the electricity (supply) act, 1948 or rules framed thereunder shall remain unaffected and shall continue to be ..... in force. than (2) nothing contained in this act will apply to the power grid corporation of india limited, or other bodies or licensees .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

b.y. Nilugal Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... vested with the commissioner, khb. the disciplinary authority is commissioner, khb and appellate authority is principal secretary, housing department under the karnataka housing board act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the khb act, 1962, for short) read with the karnataka housing board rules 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the khb rules, 1964, for short). there is no provision empowering the state government to recommend ..... for the state vehemently opposed the contentions of the petitioner. the learned aga for the state pointed out, under sub-section 6 of section 10 of the khb act, 1962, the commissioner, karnataka housing board is equated to that of a major head of the department of the state government under the karnataka civil services rules. therefore, respondent no.2 - commissioner is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //