Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Court: gujarat Page 9 of about 5,991 results (0.076 seconds)

State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Labour Court, Rajkot (P.R. Mankad) and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1968)0GLR815; (1968)ILLJ148Guj

..... the purpose of the administration of the port. the port officer was to act as the secretary of the harbour board and schedules of staff and of pay and allowances were to be prepared and sanctioned by the board. rule 7 of the okha port rules provides that : '(1) the board shall, with the previous approval of government, from time to time prepare ..... rules applied to them. it appears that the state of baroda had passed order no. 164 dated 13 october, 1941 applying the provident fund rules of gaikwad baroda state railways and to allow its staff to contribute to provident fund as laid down in those rules, to certain category of servants who were employed in the service of the ..... administration of the okha port. thus prior to august 1949, the port of okha was owned and administered by the former indian state of baroda and consequent upon the merger of that state with the province of bombay, the ownership of the port of okha vested in the government of bombay .....

Mehta Rameshchandra Manilal Vs. Spl Land Acquisition Officer

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3672

..... idea about distance of sanand-bavla road. that st bus stand is within the village and he had no idea about distance from s.t. bus stand to railway station. it has been stated that there is a market surrounding s.t. bus stand.7. documentary evidence in support of their case has been produced and ..... are directly connected with viramgam town for business, education, industries, etc. and there are ginning, pressing factories, nationalised banks, godowns of food corporation, offices of indian oil corporation etc. and that the area has potentiality for further development. the claimants aggrieved by the said fixation, took the matter for reference u/s 18 of ..... decided to take at rs. 35.00 per sq. meter by consent award under the land acquisition act. a letter dated 1st march, 1993 from maneklal prahladbhai patel to the chairman, gujarat housing board, ahmedabad and the housing commissioner, gujarat housing board, ahmedabad was produced at exh. 100, wherein it was stated by mr. maneklal that he has .....

Madhinabhai Nimatbhai and ors. Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : II(1984)ACC97; (1983)1GLR243

..... therefore, there was no checking during the monsoon or after the monsoon. if this was the situation the evidence itself would show that gujarat electricity board was negligent. there was a duty cast by indian electricity rules, 1956 and we may only refer to two rules. rule 29(1) reads as under:29. construction, installation, protection, operation and ..... precautions were ever taken immediately after the storm or during the monsoon season or immediately after monsoon season.9. we may refer to privy council case reported in quebec railway, light, heat and power company limited v. vandry 1920 a.c. 662. that was a case where article 1054 of the civil code of quebec was considered ..... attaches in the above cases (is responsabilite eidessus a liev) only when the person subject to it fails to establish that he was unable to prevent the act (le fait) which has caused the damage.masters or employees are responsible for the damage caused by their servants and workmen in the performance of the work .....

Porbandar Commercial Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. Bhanji Lavji and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1985Guj106; (1985)1GLR49

..... opponent no. 3 firm rightly disowned their liability under the surety ship agreement in favour of petitioner-bank as they got discharged under section 141 of the indian contract act in view of the fact that the manager of the petitioner- bank. shri raval in his deposition clearly stated' that the hypothicated goods which formed the ..... author in this connection has referred to the case of brettel v. williams, (1849) 4 ex. 623; wherein the facts were that the defendants who were railway contractors had made a sub-contract for performance of part of some work they had undertaken. the sub-contractor required a quantity of coal, and one of the defendants ..... 3 respectively. money decrees were claimed against the principal debtor as well as against the partners of the concerned two firms, defendants nos. 2 and 3 respectively. the board of nominees, after recording the evidence in both these cases, came to the conclusion that the principal debtor, original defendant no. 1, was liable to pay the .....

P.K. Shah Vs. Gujarat Industrial Co-op. Bank Limited

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)1GLR108; (2001)ILLJ783Guj

..... under section 3a of the coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948 (xlvi of 1948), or the central board of trustees and the state boards of trustees constituted under section 5a and section 5b respectively of the employees' provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (xix of 1952), or the 'indian airlines' and 'air india' corporations established under section 3 of the air ..... and other relevant statutes. section 2(a) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 defines 'appropriate government' and reads as under :- '2(a): 'appropriate government' means :- (i) in relation to any industrial disputes concerning any industry carried on by or under the authority of the central government or by a railway company or concerning any such controlled industry as may be specified in .....

AshwIn N. Parekh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1986)1GLR569; (1987)IILLJ304Guj

..... such labour. however, such labourers are entitled to rights and privileges statutorily admissible under different statutes, such as, minimum wages act. workmen's compensation act, etc., or those specifically sanctioned by the railway board from time to time. under rule 2505, the service of the casual labour can be terminated without notice unless there is ..... the petitioner was a casual labourer as defined in rule 2501(a) read with 2501(b)(ii) of indian railway establishment manual (hereinafter called 'the manual') he could not be said to be a temporary railway servant as defined in rule 2301 of the manual and, therefore, there was no need to hold ..... as under :- ''2511. (a) casual labour treated as temporary are entitled to all the rights and privileges admissible to temporary railway servants as laid down in chapter xxiii of the indian railways establishment manual. the rights and privileges admissible to such labour also include the benefits of the discipline and appeal rules. their service .....

Manubhai Punamchand Upadhya and anr. Vs. Indian Railways and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1(1998)ACC39

..... 82-a of the indian railways act, 1890 was preferred before the claims commissioner, at baroda, restricting the claim, at rs. 50,000/-. however, the plaintiffs desired to claim more than rs. 50,000/- by ..... of the deceased shailesh, who claimed an amount of rs. 2,00,000/-, by way of compensation by invoking the aid of the provisions of section 80 of the indian railways act, 1890 (as then applied). 4. deceased was an earning member of the family. he was unmarried. he was hale and hearty. earlier, a claim petition under section ..... at ahmedabad;(iv) deceased was commuting from ahmedabad to mehsana and back home for his employment with the o.n.g.c.;(v) on 18.7.1981, deceased had boarded delhi mail, train, from ahmedabad, for going to mehsana and the said train had an accident, on account of derailment between dangarva and ambaliyasan; near mehsana;(vi) .....

All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants Vs. Central Board of Direct ...

Court : Gujarat

..... 2015 wherein, the court has observed that extension of time for submission of income tax returns is the domain of the indian government and the central board of direct taxes, and had directed the central board of direct taxes to consider the representations dated 15th september, 2015 peremptorily by 29th september, 2015. reference was also made ..... state and would affect the principle of governance engrained in the theory of separation of powers. the decision of the supreme court in the case of federation of railway officers association and others v. union of india, (2003) 4 scc 289, was cited for the proposition that in examining a question of the nature ..... the same thereby causes inconvenience to the practitioners of the subject. the court further observed that there is sufficient time available to the government, after the finance act of the financial year, to finalise the forms and if no change is intended therein, to notify the same immediately. the court found no justification for .....

Union of India Vs. Mansukhlal Jethalal

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1975Guj116

..... it has got jurisdiction to entertain this suit. it is also held that no claim notice as contemplated under section 78-b of the indian railways act, 1890 (which will be hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), was necessary as it was not a case of recovery of over charges. non-giving of such a notice, therefore, was not ..... ., air 1971 sc 349. it is observed by the supreme court:'where the railway rates tribunal constituted under section 34 of the railways act, 1890 declares without giving any consequential relief that the charge made by the railway administration under the order of the railway board levying tariff at the standard rates but on the footing that for each kilometer ..... and ambit of section 77. it would be a claim for refund of an overcharge in respect of goods carried by railway within the meaning of section 77 now renumbered as section 78-b of the indian railways act, 1890, the petitioners were, therefore, not entitled to maintain a suit in the absence of a requisite notice to the .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Harshadray Jayantilal and Co.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1979)1GLR387

..... present suits the plaintiffs have applied to the court for a direction to the western railway administration to file the arbitration agreements in court. sub-section (1) of section 37 of the arbitration act provides that 'all the provisions of the indian limitation act, 1908, shall apply to arbitrations as they apply to proceedings in court.' in view ..... act, 1963, the supreme court has laid down that the expression 'any other application' used in article 137 cannot be ..... from that date, it is clear that the suits filed under section 20 of the arbitration act were barred by time.5. mr. pandit has invited my attention to the decision of the supreme court in the kerala slate electricity board, trivandrum v. t.p. kunhaliumma : [1977]1scr996 adverting to article 137 of the limitation .....