Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian medical council act 1956 section 6 incorporation of the council Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 543 results (0.112 seconds)

K.R. Divya Shree and Others Vs. Rajiv Gandhi Health University, Bangal ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(2)KarLJ187

..... respondent-university was not justified in rejecting the prayer made by the petitioners. alternatively, it was urged that gracing of marks was provided for by the regulations framed under the indian medical council act, 1956, which were binding upon the respondent-university and which entitled such of the candidates as were eligible for the award of such marks to claim the benefit thereof. inasmuch ..... india for undergraduate qualifications on 15th and 16th of april, 1977, duly approved by the central government on 30th of november, 1977 as regulations under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. regulation x(10) of the said regulations provides for grace marking and reads as under.-'x(10) grace marks up to a maximum of 5 may be awarded at .....

Medical Council of India, New Delhi Vs. J.N. Medical College, Belgaum ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1961; 1999(5)KarLJ1

..... state of karnataka including respondent 1 and a learned single judge of this court held that after incorporation of sections 10-a, 10b and 10-c of the (indian) medical council act, 1956 (for short, the act) and the relevant regulations framed in pursuance of the said incorporation, even though the college which is established earlier to 1992 has increased the seats i.e., prior ..... the case of state of kerala v kumari t.p. roshana , has observed that.- 'the indian medical council act, 1956 has constituted the medical council of india as an expert body to control the minimum standards of medical education and to regulate their observance. obviously, this high powered council has power to prescribe the minimum standards of medical education. it has implicit power to prescribe the minimum standard of .....

A Citizen of India Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR3136; 1996(7)KarLJ426

..... maintain the minimum standards of education and in order to curb the tendencies made more stringent provisions by amending the indian medical council act with effect from 27th of august 1992 by enacting the indian medical council (amendment) act, 1993 which is preceded by two ordinances nos. 13/92 and 2/93 as operating at the material time ..... have been too late to remedy the havoc which would have fallen on thorn because of stringent provisions contained in section 10b of the indian medical council act and the dentist act.6. keeping in view the aforesaid avowed objects, since the determination of the issues involved, required collection of enormous data and information regarding ..... committee decisions and legal advice enclosed herewith).i am directed to request you to initiate action as per the legal advice under section 19 of the indian medical council act in the matter, at the earliest (list enclosed).this may be treated as most urgent. yours faithfully dr. m. sachdeva, secretary.' 14. .....

Dr. Y.K. Nagarajaiah Vs. the Vice-chancellor, Kuvempu University and o ...

Court : Karnataka

..... . (radio-diagnosis), 1997 qualification granted by kuvempu university in respect of students trained at j.j. medical college, davanagere is recognised by the council and included in the schedule of the indian medical council act, 1956. accordingly, petitioner made a request to the respondent-university, to issue the revised masters degree ..... under section 26(1) of the indian medical council act, 1956 wherein it is stated that, the m.d. (radiology), 1997 medical qualification granted by kuvempu university in respect of students trained at j.j. medical college, davanagere is not included in the schedule to the indian medical council act, 1956, but, post-graduation qualification ..... graduate qualification by the nomenclature of m.d, (radio-diagnosis), 1997 granted by kuvempu university is recognised by the council and is included in the schedule of the indian medical council act. 1956. it can further be seen that, the third respondent-college has also forwarded a communication to the university .....

Dhanraj Vs. Gulbarga University, Gulbarga and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR3880; 1999(5)KarLJ297

..... wholly untenable and has got to be rejected. the provisions of the central act are pari materia with those of the indian medical council act, 1956.8. the supreme court in the case of medical council of india v state of karnataka and others, has held in para 25 of the judgment that.-'the indian medical council act is relatable to entry 66 of list i (union list). it prevails over ..... any state enactment to the extent the state enactment is repugnant to the provision of the act even though the state acts may be relatable to entry 25 or 26 of list iii (concurrent list .....

Kavita Pabby and Others Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2000(3)KarLJ182

..... the said regulation to be mandatory having overriding effect over any state law or regulation. paragraph 25 of the report reads as under:'the indian medical council act is relatable to entry 66 of list i (union list). it prevails over any state enactment to the extent the state enactment is repugnant ..... university is admittedly governed by the regulations framed by the medical council of india for postgraduate medical education, 1997 ('the m.c.i. regulations' for short). the said regulation has been framed under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. in the case of medical council of india v state of karnataka and others, the supreme ..... the central government are statutory. these regulations are framed to carry out the purposes of the medical council act and for various purposes mentioned in section 33. if a regulation falls within the purposes referred under section 33 of the medical council act, it will have mandatory force. regulations have been framed with reference to clauses (fa), .....

Dr. Manish Joshi, Madhurai and Others Vs. the Registrar, Karnataka Med ...

Court : Karnataka

..... throughout the country in view of the section 27 of the indian medical council act is ill-founded and is rejected. 18. section 21(1) of the indian medical council act, 1956 reads as follows:- 21. the indian medical register.- (1) the council shall cause to be maintained in the prescribed manner a register of medical practitioners to be known as the indian medical register, which shall contain the names of all persons who ..... to be made in the prescribed manner by any such person to enter his name in the indian medical register. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956, the medical council of india with the previous sanction of the central government made the medical council of india regulations, 2000 which was published in the gazette of india on 15-11-2000. part .....

State of Karnataka Vs. a Citizen of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2934; 1999(3)KarLJ363

..... madhya pradesh and another v kumari nivedita jain and others. the position in law then was that regulations could he framed under section 19a of the indian medical council act and such regulations are directory in nature as held by the supreme court. the object of the aforesaid provision was only to lay down the standards ..... the aforesaid section did not arise for consideration at all. in the result the contentions that even after introduction of sections 10-a to 10-c to indian medical council act, state enactments would prevail are rejected.15. the aforesaid conclusion would not fully decide the cases on hand inasmuch as all the colleges have been established ..... prescription of minimum standards is only advisory in nature and not of binding character. he therefore submitted that the provisions of section 10a of the indian medical council act cannot override the view expressed by the supreme court in the aforesaid decision. if therefore, the matter is examined in the light of the enunciation .....

Dr. Srinivasa K Vs. The Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... qualification & experience i) must possess mbbs degree or equivalent qualification included in any one of the schedules of the indian medical council act, 1956. must be registered in a state medical register or indian medical register. sl. no.1 46 2 associate professor ii) should have any one of the recognized postgraduate qualification i ..... three years. i) must possess mbbs degree or equivalent qualification included in any one of the schedules of the indian medical council act 1956. must be registered in a state medical register or indian medical register. ii) should have any one of the recognized postgraduate qualification i.e., md /ms in the concerned ..... qualification & experience i) must possess mbbs degree or equivalent qualification included in any one of the schedules of the indian medical council act 1956. must be registered in a state medical register or indian medical register. ii) should have any one of the recognized postgraduate qualification i.e., md /ms in the concerned .....

Nishanth Hiremath Vs. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR4237

..... shall have to be examined in the light of the provisions of the indian medical council act, the dentist act, and the decision of the supreme court in unnikrishnan's case. the indian medical council act, 1956 was enacted to provide for recognition of the medical qualifications granted by medical institutions and to prescribe standards of post graduate medical education for the guidance of universities and to advise universities in the matter ..... court held, had to give way to the provisions of the central enactment. the court observed:-'the state acts, namely, karnataka universities act and karnataka capitation fee act must give way to the central act, namely, the indian medical council act, 1956. karnataka capitation fee act was enacted for the sole purpose of regulation in collection of capitation fee by colleges and for that the state government is empowered .....