Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... had no capacity to purchase those properties. learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the said amendment is barred by limitation under article 113 of indian evidence act, 1963. article 113 of indian evidence act is applicable to the suits for which there is no prescribed period of limitation. under the said article, the suit has to be filed within ..... filed. the statement made before the land reforms tribunal was sought to be used that there was an earlier partition. this court, referring to the judgment of the privy council and a judgment of a division bench, observed as follows:- "in the case of venkatapathi v. venkatanarasimha (3) air 193.pc 264.exercise rules provide that the ..... not sufficient to acquire any property. it is also averred that late surya rao was drawing a meager salary and he was suffering from cancer and was on medical leave till his death and he had no funds to acquire 'b' schedule properties. there is no need to refer to the other pleadings of other defendants .....
Tag this Judgment!