Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-09-1998
Reported in : AIR1998P& H211
..... increasing the number of seats or that the institution will not be able to cope up with the additional influx of students or that in regard to medical colleges the indian medical council will not sanction additional seats.' 31. as will be seen hereafter, the warning given in sanjay gulati'scase (air 1983 sc 580) (supra) ..... quashed raise a sensitive human issue. it is unquestionably true that the authorities who are charged with the duty of admitting students to educational institutions must act fairly and objectively. if admissions to these institutions are made on extraneous considerations and the authorities violate the norms set down by the rules and regulations, ..... arbitrariness.(iii) the basic requirement of article 14 is fairness in state action irrespective of the nature of power exercised by the state. the state cannot act arbitrarily by way of giving jobs or entering into contracts or issuing quota or licence. its every action must be confined and structured by rational, relevant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Sep-27-1998
Reported in : (1999)121PLR29
..... by the sub registrar. against this, it is contended by the counsel appearing on behalf of contesting respondents that the powers vested under section 35 of the indian registration act was erroneously exercised by the sub registrar with the connivance of the petitioners and therefore, the registrar in the facts and circumstances of this case rightly rectified ..... the person was unable to take care of himself being a man of unsound mind. dr. s.c. goyal, civil surgeon, deposed that while posted as registrar, medical college, rohtak in may, 1980, swaran singh lunatic was found suffering from mental retardation. swaran singh was unable to take care of himself and his belongings without ..... support of his title. reliance in this regard was placed on the judgment in mohori bibee v. dharmadas ghose, i.lr. 30 calcutta, 539 wherein the privy council made it perfectly clear that section 11 should be literally construed.10. in subba naicker v. solaiappa naicker, a.i.r. 1933 madras 624, the learned judge .....
Tag this Judgment!