Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian medical council act 1956 section 26 registration of additional qualifications Court: kerala state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc thiruvananthapuram

Apr 26 2010 (TRI)

Dr. M.K. Balakrishnan Vs. K. Abdul Nazeer

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

..... filed at the instance of the complainant herein against the opposite party as the accused for the offence under section 417, 419, 420, 468 and 471 ipc and section 15 of the indian medical council act and the said case ended in acquittal. on the other hand, the respondent/complainant supported the findings and conclusions of the forum below and prayed for dismissal ..... drug prescribed is novospar and it was prescribed on 30.7.02. but that medicine was purchased by the complainant only on 31.7.02. according to pw3, the medical shop is 250 ft away from the clinic of the opposite party. if that be so, the medicine prescribed on 30.7.02 ought to have been purchased on ..... , mangalore was supplied to the appellant/opposite party. but there is no evidence available on record to show that such a letter pad was issued by sreenivas medical hall, mangalore to the opposite party balakrishnan. it is also to be noted that the opposite party has categorically contended that the said letter pad is a concocted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2010 (TRI)

Dr. M.K. Balakrishnan Vs. M. Yusuf

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

..... it is true that the opposite party was the accused in the aforesaid criminal case charged under section 417, 419, 420, 468, 471 ipc and sections 15 of the indian medical council act. the allegation in the said criminal case was also as alleged in the present complaint in op.90/03. the learned chief judicial magistrate ..... case of the complainant that the opposite party prescribed allopathic medicines by issuing a1 prescription. it is hard to believe that the appellant/opposite party issued a1 medical prescription to the complainant. so, this commission have no hesitation to set aside the impugned order passed by the forum below. hence we do so. ..... pw4 in finding the opposite party negligent in treating the complainant. 9. the forum below placed reliance on the testimony of pw4 and thereby rejected the medical certificates and experience certificates produced by the opposite party to prove his qualification and experience. pw4 could speak about the competency of the opposite party to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //