Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian medical council act 1956 section 23 registration in the indian medical register Page 85 of about 1,343 results (0.295 seconds)

M.P. All India Tourist Permit Owners Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT15

..... it was held to be repugnant to the provisions of all india medicine central council act and void to the extent of repugnancy. sections 15 and 21 read with sections 11 & 14 of the indian medical council act, 1956 made the recognised medical qualifications necessary to practise that system of medicine. to that extent the qualification for ..... that system of medicine prescribed under the state act which permitted a person to practise allopathic system of medicine even though ..... he does not possess recognised medical qualifications as prescribed by the central act was held to be void. thus, in the said case there was a .....

Sushil Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1999Raj127

..... in the other system, allopathy, to be practised. he trespassed into a prohibited field and was liable to be prosecuted under section 15(3) of the indian medical council act, 1956. his conduct amounted to an actionable negligence particularly as the duty of care indicated by this court in dr. laxman joshi case(air 1969sc 128) ..... reported in (1996)4scc332:(air 1996 sc 2111), poonam verma v. ashwin patel, wherein the hon'ble supreme court while dealing with case of registered medical practitioners, who were registered under homoeopathic system only, observed that the respondents in that case were under statutory duty not to enter the field of any ..... certain writ petitioners there is difference of their academic qualification, however, the point involving in the case is whether the petitioners who are registered as ayurvedic medical practitioners can be allowed to practise in medicine profession in regard to other system of medicine that is homoeopathy or allopathy. no order has been challenged .....

Rajasthan Vidya Peeth Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001(4)WLN560

..... qualification for the post. qualification prescribed for the said post included, amongst other,(i) a basic university degree or equivalent qualification entered in the schedule of indian medical council act 1956, and (ii) post-graduate qualification in concerned subject. his qualification of m.d. (forensic science) was not considered on the ground that ..... .(15). in this connection attention of the court has been invited to annx. 8 furnished by the petitioner university which is an order issued by national council for . teacher education. in the state of rajasthan, it has recognised the rajasthan vidya peeth. deemed university, dabok (lokmanya tilak teaching college, udaipur) ..... . the supreme court, reversing the judgment of division bench, said:'in the case of post-graduate degree in concerned subject awarded by other statutory indian university, no recognition or declaration of equivalency by any other university is called for.'(13). the court would examine what is the degree conferred by .....

M/S.Gem Granites. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu. and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... cover the whole field. the contention of shri sanghi that there is no repugnancy between the proviso to section 5(5) of the medical university act and section 10-a of the indian medical council act because both can be complied with, cannot, therefore, be accepted. what has to be seen is whether in enacting section 10-a ..... of the indian medical council act, parliament has evinced an intention to cover the whole field relating to establishment of new medical colleges in the country...."32. in state of tamil nadu vs. adhiyaman educational & research institute and others, (1995) ..... no.95 of the said judgment.31. placing reliance upon a decision of the supreme court in the case of thirumuruga kirupananda variyar thavathiru sundara swamigal medical educational & charitable trust vs. stte of tamil nadu ((1996) 3 scc 15), the learned senior counsel further contended that when there is a repugnancy between .....

Ritu Vashisth vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi ) & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... 2018 of police station moti nagar under sections 417/419/420/468/471/ 380/354/354-b/509/120-b/498-a/4of the indian penal code, 1860 (ipc) and section 15 of the indian medical council act, 1956, is set aside. the said bail application moved before the court of sessions is dismissed as withdrawn.13. liberty is granted to ..... nagar statedly involving offences punishable under sections 417/419/420/468/471/380/354/354-b/509/120-b/498-a/406/ 34 of the indian penal code, 1860 (ipc) and section 15 of the indian medical council act, 1956, the petitioner herein being the first informant (complainant/victim), the former (the second respondent) having married the petitioner, some petitions seeking ..... 05.2018 in connection with another fir no.172/2018 of police station kirti nagar, involving offences punishable under sections 186/353/307/323/506 ipc and sections 25 and 27 of the arms act. thereafter, he was formally arrested in the present case, i.e., fir no.82/2018. it appears he (the accused) was released .....

All Kerala Distributors Association, Represented By Its Secretary Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... by its legislation an intention to cover the whole field. the contention of shri sanghi that there is no repugnancy between the proviso to section 5(5) of the medical university act and section 10-a of the indian medical council act because both can be complied with, cannot, therefore, be accepted. what has to be seen is whether in enacting section 10-a of the ..... indian medical council act, parliament has evinced an intention to cover the whole field relating to establishment of new medical colleges in the country.34. keeping in mind the exposition of this court in the aforementioned decisions, we would immediately turn to the .....

C.J. Patel Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(1)MhLj572

..... to cover the whole field. the contention of shri sanghi that there is no repugnancy between the proviso to section 5(5) of the medical university act and section 10-a of the indian medical council act because both can be complied with, cannot, therefore, be accepted. what has to be seen is whether in enacting section 10-a of ..... the indian medical council act, parliament has evinced an intention to cover the whole field relating to establishment of new medical colleges in the country.'11. however, in the present case, the petitioners have not pointed out as to how the ..... payment of house rent allowance under the provisions of maharashtra act is in conflict with the provisions of section 4 of central act no. 62 of 1976. a perusal .....

Dr. Basavaraj Yellappa Kalgudi Vs. the Karnataka Ayurvedic and Unani P ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2004Kant390; ILR2004KAR3140

..... a practitioner registered under chapter ii of this act or (ii) a practitioner registered under the mysore medical registration act, 1961 or the mysore homeopathic practitioners act. 1961 or a practitioner whose name if for the time being borne on the indian medical register maintained under the indian medical council act, 1956 or (iii) a person whose name ..... a practitioner whose name is entered in part-a or part-b of the register.ii) a certificate required by any act from any medical practitioner or medical officer shall be valid, if such certificate has been signed by a practitioner whose name is entered in part-a or ..... who practices homeopathic system of medicine without requisite qualification. the provision of the karnataka ayurvedic and unani practitioners' registration of medical practitioners miscellaneous provisions act, 1961 (for short 'the act') are not applicable to a practitioner who practices homeopathic system of medicine. therefore the order impugned is without jurisdiction. .....

Dr. Prakash Chandra Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1976MP50

..... medical register of a state meant for the registration of persons practising the modern scientific system of medicine; excluding ..... 5th june 1972 and in so far as relevant, reads as follows:'2(ee) registered medical practitioner means a person- (i) holding a qualification granted by an authority specified or notified under section 3 of the indian medical degrees act, 1916 (7 of 1916), or specified in the schedules to the indian medical council act, 1956 (102 of 1956); or (ii) registered or eligible for registration in a .....

Mittal Trading Agency Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1983P& H236

..... (ii) registered or eligible for registration in a medical register of a state meant for the registration of persons practising the modern scientific system of medicine, or ..... licensee under the drugs and cosmetics act nor a registered medical practitioner as provided under r. 2(ee) which reads as under :--'2(ee) 'registered medical practitioner' means a person:-- (i) holding a qualification granted by an authority specified or notified under s. 3 of the indian medical degrees act 1916(7 of 1916) or specified in the schedules to the indian medical council act 1956(102 of 1956), or .....