Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian medical council act 1956 section 19 withdrawal of recognition Page 4 of about 4,684 results (0.207 seconds)

Teerthanker Mahaveer Institute of Management Vs. Union of India and or ...

Court : Delhi

..... time of third renewal - i.e. along with the admission of fourth batch for the mbbs course;43. section 10a was introduced in the indian medical council act through an amendment by the indian medical council (amendment)act, 1993 w.e.f. 27.8.1992. along with the introduction of section 10a, clauses (fa), (fb) and (fc) were also ..... the said reason of rejection.41. extensive arguments were advanced from both the sides. taking a resolute stand, primarily on the interpretation of the provisions of indian medical council act and the regulations framed thereunder, mr. maninder singh, learned senior advocate assisted by mr. gaurav sharma, mr. neeraj shekhar and mr.ashutosh thakur, advocates ..... . the counsel contended that the mci being a body much aware of the rules and regulations framed by the board of governors and under the indian medical council act, 1956 should have rejected the application of the petitioner for additional intake at the very outset and now it cannot turn around and cite the said .....

P.Anand Vs. the Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... therefore, it is certainly not open to the first respondent university to contradict the clause which is available and framed by the medical council of india as per section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956 in the form of a statutory regulation after the consent from the central government.16. the problem has to be approached ..... regulations framed by the mci with the previous sanction of the central government, in regard to any of the matters referred to in section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956, will have statutory force and are mandatory. universities must necessarily be guided by the mci regulations. any regulations made by the universities which are ..... 2007] 10 scc 201, the supreme court had an occasion to consider regulation 12(4) of the mci regulations, 1997 framed under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. while extracting the regulation 12(4) which sets out the distribution of marks to various disciplines and the heads of passing in each subject in .....

Dr. Meena D/O M.G. Bathija Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ675

..... same department and the remaining six months in an allied department.20. it is clear from a perusal of the abovesaid criteria laid down by the indian medical council in exercise of its regulatory power under the indian medical council act that while it is intended under the said criteria that after passing the final m.b.b.s. examination, and after obtaining full registration i.e ..... the petitioners have done housemanship, are not recognised hospitals or incapable of imparting training as required under the 'regulations' approved by the government of india under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. what is required under the 'regulations' is that the candidate should have done one year's housemanship in the subject in which he wants admission. a candidate, who has .....

Gurpreet Singh Sidhu and ors. Vs. Punjab University, Chandigarh and or ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1983P& H70

..... 18. once it is held that regulation ii is neither mandatory nor has a statutory force and is beyond the scope of section 33 of the indian medical council act, it seems to be plain that the very corner-stone of the petitioners' stand in this context falls and the argument resting thereon must crumble. ..... have any statutory force. in fact, it was after opining that regulation ii, recommending the process of selection, was outside the authority of the council under section 33 of the indian medical council act that their lordships, for a variety of other reasons, concluded as under (at p. 2057) :--'we are, therefore, of the opinion that ..... of the central government allegedly through the medium of the medical council of india. indeed the core of the attack seems to be that the medical council constituted under section 3 of the indian medical council act exercises such a degree of control over all institutions imparting higher medical education, that the central government, which would be presumed .....

Dr.S.P.Shiani and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. Bythe

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... is clearly held by the honble supreme court that the state is not empowered to take any steps to dilute the standards notified by the medical council of india under the indian medical council act, 1956, which is enacted under entry 66 of list-i of schedule-vii of the constitution, and hence, this judgment is also not of ..... honble supreme court has held that such order issued by the government did not infringe nor was it in conflict with the regulations notified by the medical council of india under indian medical council act, 1956, which is legislated under entry 66 of list-iii of schedule-vii. in this case, as we are holding that the impugned rules ..... notified by the honble supreme court for making admissions into post-graduate courses for the academic year 2014-15.21. the indian medical council at, 1956 is enacted by the parliament by repealing the earlier indian medical council act, 1933 and the legislative competence to enact such law is traceable to entry 66 of list-i of schedule-vii to .....

Dr. V.K. JaIn Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)MPHT219; 2007(3)MPLJ576

..... of 200 marks in the pmt-2005. he submitted that under regulation 5(ii) of the regulations on graduate medical education, 1997 made by the medical council of india under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956, in case of admission on the basis of competitive entrance examination, a candidate must have passed in the ..... admission to the three candidates contrary not only to the regulation 5 (ii) of the regulations on graduate medical education, 1997 made by the medical council of india under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956, but also the directions of this court in the order dated 11-5-2005 passed in writ petition ..... admission to candidates, both in the mbbs and post graduate courses.7. regulation 5(ii) of the regulation on graduate medical education, 1997 made under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956 by the medical council of india, is quoted hereinbelow:5. (ii) in case of admission on the basis of competitive entrance examination under clauses .....

Dr. RobIn Kaushik Vs. Union Public Service Commission Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)138PLR87

..... r-iii, that m.s. (general surgery) qualification granted by the university in respect of the students of dayanand medical college, ludhiana is not recognised by the m.c.i, for the purposes of indian medical council act, 1956. in view of the above, it is stated that the petitioner has become ineligible for the post. it ..... xxx17. the learned counsel for the respondent has invited my attention to a booklet titled medical council of india. directory of postgraduate medical education courses, issued by the medical council of india in the year 2000 edition, and also to the schedule of indian medical council act, 1956 and at item no. 81, appearing at page no.37 in book-let ..... posts. the degree of m.s. (surgery) granted by the punjab university is a recognised degree under section 11(1) of the indian medical council act, 1956 (hereafter referred to as 'the act'). after interview, the petitioner was duly selected and appointed as a senior lecturer in the department of general surgery in the government .....

Ravi Singhal vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... seeking migration was not recognized and the college to which he seeks migration was also not recognized; in view of bar of section 11 (2) of the indian medical council act, migration was not permitted. the minutes of this meeting lpa5832017 page 3 of 9 is that the petitioner dated 09.11.2016 had however been communicated to ..... of students from one college to another is permissible only if both the colleges are recognized by the central government under section 11 (2) of the indian medical council act, 1956 and further subject to the condition that it shall not result in increase in the sanctioned intake capacity for the academic year concerned in respect of the ..... to another is feasible and can be permitted if both the colleges are recognized by the central government under section 11 (2) of the indian medical council act, 1956. in this case, this essential condition was not fulfilled when the appellant had sought migration. the counsel had contended that fakhruddin ali ahmed .....

Miss Ankita Subhash Lotlikar (Minor) Through Her Natural Guardian and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR649

..... in the case of dr. preeti srivastava (supra), leaves no doubt that the above regulations have statutory force and are mandatory and that the scheme of the indian medical council act, 1956, does not give any option to the university to follow or not to follow the standards laid down by the mci and the contrary view expressed by ..... dr. preeti srivastava and anr. v. state of m.p. and ors., : air1999sc2894 , wherein it was held by the apex court that the scheme of the indian medical council act, 1956, does not give an option to the universities to follow or not to follow the standards laid down by the mci. reliance was also placed on the earlier ..... expressed by the apex court in the case of state of madhya pradesh v. nivedita jain, : [1982]1scr759 that the provisions of the indian medical council act and the regulations framed for under-graduate medical courses under regulation ii were only recommendatory, which need not be followed. similar view was taken by a three judge bench of the apex court .....

Kamlesh Kumar Udenia (Dr.) Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1994(0)MPLJ342

..... as assistant surgeon.12. the true legal position appears to be that not all recommendations/regulations framed by the medical council of india are mandatory. only those of them which, considering the provisions of indian medical council act, 1956, properly fall within the power and competence. of the medical council of india, and which considering also the circumstance that peremptory language is employed in them, are mandatory. other ..... court decision in nivedita's case (supra).13. an analysis of the various provisions of indian medical council act, 1956 (hereinafter called i.m.c. act) would show that while it is within the power and competence of the medical council of india to prescribe standards of medical education required for granting .recognised medical qualifications, the matter regarding how the selection of candidates is to be made for admission .....