Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian medical council act 1956 section 19 withdrawal of recognition Court: supreme court of india Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.251 seconds)

Smt. Selvi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... nail clippings by the use of modern and scientific techniques including dna profiling and such other tests which the registered medical practitioner thinks necessary in a particular case;(b)`registered medical practitioner' means a medical practitioner who possesses any medical qualification as defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the indian medical council act , 1956 (102 of 1956) and whose name has been entered in a state ..... medical register.146. the respondents have urged that the impugned techniques should be read into the relevant provisions - i.e. sections 53 .....

Rajasthan Pradesh V.S. Sardarshahar and Anr,ayurveda Vikas Chikitasak ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... " or "ayurved ratna" from hindi sahitya sammelan prayag/allahabad which are not included as recognized qualification in schedule ii of the indian medicine central council act, 1970 (hereinafter called as the `act 1970') have a right to practice in medical sciences. (ii) as to whether cut off date i.e. 1967 as per entry no.105 in the second schedule of ..... case, before us. the efficacy of this very degree to entitle the holders thereof to continue to practice as medical practitioner by virtue of the saving clause and protection under section 17(3) of the indian medicine central council act, 1970, had come up for decision in the earlier case and with particular reference to the provisions of section ..... 14 of the indian medical central council act, 1970, read with the provisions contained in the schedule thereto it has been held that only such of those degrees issued between 1931 and 1967 .....

Kusum Sharma and ors. Vs. Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2010SC1052,JT2010(2)SC7,RLW2010(1)SC722,2010(2)SCALE267,2010(2)LC953(SC)

..... answer for it. a professional deserves total protection. the indian penal code has taken care to ensure that people who act in good faith should not be punished. sections 88, 92 and 370 of the indian penal code give adequate protection to the professional and particularly medical professionals.82. the privy council in john oni akerele v. the king air 1943 pc ..... 72 dealt with a case where a doctor was accused of manslaughter, reckless and negligent act and he was convicted. his conviction was set aside ..... under criminal law was not an issue before the court - as it did not arise and hence was not considered.86. in a significant judgment in indian medical association v. v.p. shantha and ors. : (1995) 6 scc 651 a three-judge bench of this court held that service rendered to a patient by a .....

Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma Vs. State of Uttarakhand.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... who had not turned hostile. the gun was allegedly recovered at the disclosure of the appellant as required but it was not in consonance with section 27 of the indian evidence act, 1872, on the basis of which the recovery of the gun could be proved. the trial court as well as the high court erred in convicting the ..... cr.p.c. has been in consonance with his version made in the fir.36. baljit singh (pw.2) was also an injured witness, and was also medically examined. the medical report corroborated the case of the prosecution. he named the appellant responsible for the crime while making a statement under section 161 cr.p.c., which was recorded ..... deceased on 28.4.2000 in the base hospital, haldwani. the other injured persons, namely, ajit singh (pw.1), baljit singh (pw.2) and hardayal singh were examined medically.5. during the investigation on 4.5.2000, the investigating officer recovered the licensed gun of the appellant, on the disclosure made by appellant himself, from an arms dealer .....

Delhi Jal Board Vs. National Campaign Etc. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and we must zero-in on them as they involve problems of access to justice for the people beyond the blinkered rules of `standing' of british-indian vintage. if the centre of gravity of justice is to shift, as the preamble to the constitution mandates, from the traditional individualism of locus standi to ..... , social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the national life. clause (2) of this article, which was inserted by the same amending act declares that state shall, in particular, strive to minimize the inequalities in income, and endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status, facilities and opportunities, not only amongst ..... workers fee of cost and copies of the medical records may also be furnished to the petitioner union. 10. learned counsel for the appellant, who had the tacit support of the learned counsel representing the government of national capital territory of delhi, new delhi municipal council and the delhi development authority, argued that the .....

M/S. Kranti Associates Pvt. Ltd. and anr.Vs. Sh. Masood Ahmed Khan and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... from articles 33, 136(2) and 227(4) of the constitution.45. in england there was no common law duty of recording of reasons. in marta stefan vs. general medical council, (1999) 1 wlr 1293, it has been held, "the established position of the common law is that there is no general duty imposed on our decision makers to ..... high court rejected such pleas and the transferee was asked to file a suit. the transferee filed an appeal to the central government under section 111 clause (3) of indian companies act, 1956 which was dismissed. thereafter, the son of the original transferee filed another application for transfer of his shares which was similarly refused by the company. on appeal, ..... and(vi) any other matter which may be prescribed.13. under section 13(5) of cp act, every proceeding of the said commission will be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the indian penal code, and the said commission shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purpose .....

Amarinder Singh Vs. Special Committee, Punjab Vidhan Sabha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... powers, privileges and immunities available to the legislature are those which were available at the time of the enactment of the constitution (forty-fourth) amendment act, 1978. subhash c. kashyap has elaborated on the indian position with these words [in parliamentary procedure - the law, privileges, practice and precedents, vol. 2 (new delhi, universal law publishing co. ..... the case law that emanated from courts in that jurisdiction; inasmuch as the same has no application to the system of governance provided by constitution of indian. article 122(1) and article 212(1) prohibit the validity of any proceedings in legislature from being called in question in a court merely on ..... court that a broad claim that all the powers enjoyed by the house of commons at the commencement of the constitution of india vest in an indian legislature cannot be accepted in its entirety because there are some powers which cannot obviously be so claimed. in this context, the following observations appearing .....

B.P. Singhal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... provides that a governor shall hold office during the pleasure of the president. having regard to article 74, the president is bound to act in accordance with the advice of the council of ministers. therefore, even though under article 156(1) the removal is at the pleasure of the president, the exercise of such ..... that article 2 confers on the parliament an unreviewable and unfettered power immune from judicial scrutiny. the power is limited by the fundamentals of the indian constitutionalism and those terms and conditions which the parliament may deem fit to impose, cannot be inconsistent and irreconcilable with the foundational principles of the constitution ..... impartial or neutral umpire where the views of the union government and state governments are in conflict. his peculiar position arises from the fact that the indian constitution is quasi-federal in character.in state of karnataka (supra), this court observed:strictly speaking, our constitution is not of a federal character where .....