Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian electricity act 1910 repealed repealing act 1 electricity act 2003 Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 9 of about 532 results (0.065 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Shadakshari Vs. The Assistante Executive Engineer

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Concorde Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri B S Patil Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Santosh A Shetty Vs. The State Of Karantaka

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mvc Hanumanthaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

G Lakshmanappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri A Ramaraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Rajanna Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri K C Mahesha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri V G Siddhartha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or other association of individuals; and (b) director in relation to:- 433 (i) a company means the director as defined in sub-section (13) of section 2 of the companies act, 1956 and partner means a partner in the firm; (ii) a society, ..... . "where an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second act revived the first ..... pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... . writ petition filed in w.p.no.3073/2006 yielded result namely, writ petition was allowed and order dated 19.03.2003 passed by the deputy conservator of forests and order dated 27.12.2005 passed by the conservator of forests came to be set aside and matter was remitted back to the authorities and it was ordered that before .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //