Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-15-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRL. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7770/2012 Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya Vs. State of Raj. Date of order :15. h December, 2012 HON'BLE SHRI SANDEEP MEHTA, J.Mr. N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Joshi,P.P. REPORTABLE Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya s/o Late Rameshchandra Goriya who has been arrested in C.R. No. 59/2012 registered at Police Station Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 274, 275, 276, 420, 120-B I.P.C. and 103, 104 Trade Mark Act and Section 17-B & 27 Drugs & Cosmetics Act. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that the S.H.O. P.S. Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur as well as the Drug Control Officer, Jodhpur received a source information regarding the 2 transaction of spurious Mero-CD, Merosul(Meropenam) injections. T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jan-19-2012
1. Both these appeals have come up for the re-consideration in view of the judgment and order dated 21.10.05 passed by the Division Bench in the DB Civil Special Appeal No. 20/86. 2. The factual matrix of these appeals is narrated as under :- 2.(i) The appellants of the S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 56/74 Smt. Rukmani Devi and Sampat Devi,(original plaintiffs) filed a civil suit being No. 70/73 (14/68) against Shri Nand Kishore and others, the respondents in the said Appeal, (original defendants) in the Court of Addl. District Judge, Court No.1, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as “the trial court”)seeking partition of the properties mentioned in para 4 of the plaint and seeking declaration that the plaintiffs were entitled to the one-fourth share in the said properties, and seeking further prayer that the plaintiffs be put in separate possession of their share in the said properties. It appears that the said plaint was subsequently amended by the plaintiffs for seeking one-fi...
Tag this Judgment!