Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 9 amendment of section 8 Sorted by: old Year: 2005 Page 91 of about 1,167 results (0.461 seconds)

New Bank of India Vs. Suba Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2006P& H84; III(2007)BC164; (2006)142PLR255

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.1. The petitioner-bank feeling aggrieved against order dated 23.12.1994 passed by the Executing Court whereby it was held that it was entitled to further interest on the original loan amount of Rs. 5,000/- only has challenged the same by way of the present: revision petition.2. The sole point for consideration in the present revision petition is whether the petitioner-bank is entitled to interest on the suit amount which included the principal amount and interest or on the original loan amount.3. The respondent-judgment debtor filed an objection in the execution proceedings stating that he had already deposited Rs. 7,000/- on 2.11.1993 and about Rs. 5,000/- was adjusted under Debt Relief Scheme by the bank and as per the law' of damdupat no amount more than twice the original loan amount can be recovered. It was further averred that the judgment debtor had borrowed only Rs. 5,000/- and the decree holder had filed execution wrongly calculating the interest. The inte...

Guru Charan Singh and ors. Vs. Mahatam Singh and anr.

Court : Patna

..... supra). in this connection it is relevant to mention paragraph 7 of the judgment.by adding the proviso along with an explanation the purpose and the object of the amending act appears to be to compel the party challenging the compromise, to question the same before the court which had recorded the compromise in question. that court was enjoined ..... the question, unless the court, for reasons to be recorded, thinks fit to grant such adjournment.][explanation- an agreement or compromise which is void or voidable under the indian contract act, 1872 (9 of 1872), shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of this rule.]3a. bar to suit.- no suit shall lie to set ..... parties have arrived at an adjustment in a lawful manner. the explanation made it clear that an agreement or a compromise which is void or voidable under the indian contract act shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of the said, rule. having introduced the proviso along with the explanation in rule 3 in order to .....

Andhra Pradesh Ips Association Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2006AP68; 2005(6)ALD464; 2006(3)ALT53

..... , for the entry 'additional chief conservator of forests' the entry 'chief conservators of forests' shall be substituted. 11. in assailing the above government order and amendments, the learned counsel for the petitioner, sri v. pattabhi, made the following submissions. wop-oop is issued by the president's secretariat which is binding and ..... belonging to coveted all india service i.e., ips, has made this court a platform for highlighting its grudge against another coveted service i.e., indian administrative service (ias). there is a lurking suspicion in the mind of this court whether the petitioner is really aggrieved by whatever it has impugned or ..... gad (political) is entrusted by reason of delegation, with the governmental functions at the secretariat level including policy formulation whereas addl.dg though may be acting independently in the sphere assigned to him cannot be treated as equal to principal secretary to government. for instance, the principal secretary to government in home .....

Welham Boys' School Society Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and Anr. ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2006)206CTR(Uttranchal)56; [2006]285ITR74(Uttaranchal)

..... had no power to rescind the order passed earlier by the commissioner granting registration to the petitioner society.14. however, learned counsel for the respondents pointed out that in indian national congress (i) v. institute of social welfare reported in [2002] 5 scc 685 the hon'ble supreme court has also pointed out that there are exceptions to ..... legislation and that it has no application to an order such as the order passed by the registrar of trade unions to cover a specific case. in indian national congress (i) v. institute of social welfare reported in [2002] 5 scc 685, the hon'ble supreme court has held that section 21 of the general ..... our view, this contention also is liable to be rejected. section 21 of the general clauses act, 1897 reads thus :21. power to issue, to include power to add to, amend, vary or rescind, notifications, orders, rules or bye-laws.- where, by any central act or regulation, a power to issue notifications, orders, rules or bye-laws is conferred, then .....

Abdul Latif S/O DIn Mohammad Khatri Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR768; 2006(1)MhLj786

..... factual aspect and as per the provision of section 19-1aa of the bombay provincial municipal corporation act and was further directed to elect the leader of opposition of indian national congress in the akola municipal corporation and also to consider the amendment dated 1-1-2004 to the constitution of india.9. it is not in dispute that to ..... by the state government in the impugned communication dated 26-8-2005 to elect the leader of opposition from indian national congress, in our view, is not sustainable in law. it is not in dispute that so far as the amendment to the xth schedule to the constitution, which came into force on 1-1-2004, does not have ..... the mayor of akola municipal corporation to consider the letter/representation dated 11-8-2005 submitted by the nine corporators of indian national congress as per the provisions of section 19-1aa of the bombay provincial corporation act and take a decision in this regard as early as possible, in any case not beyond the period of four weeks .....

Ms. Anjum Nath Vs. British Airways Plc and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 125(2005)DLT717

..... and 2, british airways plc. has sought deletion/striking out the names of mr. andy stern and mr. neil robertson, defendant nos. 3 and 4. the applicant also seeks amendment to the cause title of the suit on the ground that british airways plc having addresses at dlf plaza tower, dlf city, phase-i, gurgaon-122002, haryana and at flat ..... averments made in the plaint only have to be looked into. there are specific allegations against defendant nos. 3 and 4 who were responsible for illegal, wrongful and arbitrary acts committed on behalf of defendant nos. 1 and 2 which has led to the present disputes. consequently, they have been rightly imp leaded as parties to the present suit. ..... wrongly claimed that plaintiff had resigned, however, on the other hand he acknowledged that plaintiff had applied for a scheme which as stated hereinafter, should have read as indian early retirement scheme.10. the plaintiff was assured by defendant no. 3 that she would get a fair handling and severance pay under the .....

Walchandnagar Industries Limited (Engineering and Foundary Division) V ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR733; (2005)107BOMLR942; (2006)IILLJ834Bom

..... scrutinise as to whether the settlement is just, proper and bonafide one, keeping in view the provisions of section 18(1) of the industrial disputes act along with amendment in the said section by insertion of proviso to section 18(1).the word 'settlement' has been defined in section 2(p) of the industrial disputes ..... to the respondents. learned counsel has further taken us through section 2(p) and section 18(1) as amended by the bombay amendment of the industrial disputes act, 1947 and section 20(2b) of the mrtu & pulp act and submitted that the said settlement arrived at between the recognised union and the employer is binding on all the ..... the provisions of section 18(1) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 as unamended by bombay amendment. learned counsel has further submitted that it is equally binding on the respondent employees even if the amended proviso to section 18(1) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 brought by bombay amendment is considered. he has submitted that clause (b) of .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Nuthern Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)200CTR(Guj)649; [2006]284ITR396(Guj)

..... order. for this purpose, the tribunal placed reliance on the provisions of section 3, with special reference to sub-section (4) of the said section, of the act, as it stood prior to the amendment with effect from 1-4-1989.6. heard mr.b.b.naik, the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant revenue. though served, there is ..... has violated the same.8. as the facts go to show, the assessee ceased to exist on and from 31st december 1984 on account of amalgamation with m/s nestler boilers pvt. ltd. and hence, for assessment year 1986-87, it had to make up its accounts for the period of six months commencing from 1st july 1984 and ending on ..... accounting period is 1-7-1983 to 30-6-1984 and the assessee was assessed under section 143(3) of the act by order dated 4-1-1988.3. on 31-12-1984, the assessee company amalgamated with m/s nestler boilers pvt. ltd. therefore, the accounts of the assessee company were made up for a period of six months from 1 .....

imtiaz Ahmad Vs. A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1190

..... .) ltd. : air2002sc2394 , the apex court held that if there is no material inconsistency between the original averments and those proposed by the amendment, application for amendment should be allowed. however, the application should be moved at a proper stage. application filed at unduly delayed stage should normally be rejected.25 ..... therein had been under the provisions of sections 166, 168 and 169 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 and as the act does not provide for any limitation for filing the claim petition, the amendment at appellate stage was allowed.27. in hanumant singh rawat v. rajputana automobiles, ajmer (1993 ..... ) 1 wlc 625, rajasthan high court summarised the legal position as under:(i) that the amendment of pleadings should ordinarily be allowed by the court, once it is satisfied that the amendment .....

S. Brahmanand and ors. Vs. K.R. Muthugopal (D) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC40; 2005(6)ALD74(SC); 2006(1)AWC79(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(1)CHN136; 2005(2)CTLJ287(SC); [2006(1)JCR50(SC)]; JT2005(9)SC149; 2005(4)KLT809(SC); 2005(8)SCALE587; (2005)1

..... not insisting on performance forthwith. there is nothing strange in time for performance being extended, even though originally the agreement had a fixed date. section 63 of the indian contract act, 1872 provides that every promise may extend time for the performance of the contract. such an agreement to extend time need not necessarily be reduced to writing, but ..... the plaintiffs. what was originally covered by the first part of article 54, now fell within the purview of the second part of the article. pazhaniappa chettiyar v. south indian planting and industrial co. ltd. and anr. air 1953 trav-c. 161 was a similar instance where the contact when initially made had a date fixed for the ..... under order 6 rule 17 cpc for converting it into a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 18.8.1984. this amendment was allowed on 25.8.1989. it was held that since, the amendment was ordered on 25.8.1989, the crucial date for examining whether the suit was barred by limitation was 25.8.1989. .....