Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-26-2014
..... . civil engineering 6. commerce sbcwp no.1211/2014 bhanwar lal vs. state & ors. a/w 6 connected matters judgment dt:26/11/2014 12/83 7. economics 8. electrical engineering 9. geography 10. geology 11. indian history 12. law 13. mathematics 14. mechanical engineering 15. philosophy 16. physics 17. political science 18. psychology 19. public administration 20. sociology 21. statistics 22. zoology. ..... governor of rajasthan are known as `the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012' and were intended to come into force with immediate effect and replaced schedule iii under rule 6 completely and the section b of the earlier schedule iii providing for optional subjects was completely done away and the main examination with ..... the sbcwp no.1211/2014 bhanwar lal vs. state & ors. a/w 6 connected matters judgment dt:26/11/2014 4/83 preliminary examination of the said examination of 2007 was under challenge, held that it could be so applied and, therefore, while remanding the case, the division bench in its order dated 28/7/2014 heavily relied upon ..... case of jai singh & ors. vs. state of rajasthan - 2011 (2) wlc raj. 46, in which earlier division bench of this court was concerned with the ras examinations of 2007, held that under the provisions of the rajasthan state & subordinate services ( direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) rules 1999 (for short, the rules of 1999), in which the application of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-26-2014
..... . civil engineering 6. commerce sbcwp no.1211/2014 bhanwar lal vs. state & ors. a/w 6 connected matters judgment dt:26/11/2014 12/83 7. economics 8. electrical engineering 9. geography 10. geology 11. indian history 12. law 13. mathematics 14. mechanical engineering 15. philosophy 16. physics 17. political science 18. psychology 19. public administration 20. sociology 21. statistics 22. zoology. ..... governor of rajasthan are known as `the rajasthan state and subordinate services (direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) (amendment) rules, 2012' and were intended to come into force with immediate effect and replaced schedule iii under rule 6 completely and the section b of the earlier schedule iii providing for optional subjects was completely done away and the main examination with ..... the sbcwp no.1211/2014 bhanwar lal vs. state & ors. a/w 6 connected matters judgment dt:26/11/2014 4/83 preliminary examination of the said examination of 2007 was under challenge, held that it could be so applied and, therefore, while remanding the case, the division bench in its order dated 28/7/2014 heavily relied upon ..... case of jai singh & ors. vs. state of rajasthan - 2011 (2) wlc raj. 46, in which earlier division bench of this court was concerned with the ras examinations of 2007, held that under the provisions of the rajasthan state & subordinate services ( direct recruitment by combined competitive examination) rules 1999 (for short, the rules of 1999), in which the application of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-19-2014
..... notification dated 24.10.2003 and the letter dated 12.11.2003 and thus, the amendment was not necessary.38. it is submitted that the deferment notification was issued under section 20(3) of the act of 2003. this benefit was available only to those persons, who were availing benefit ..... . ((2001)3 scc735.30. it is submitted that the only statutory provisions relating to interest are provided in section 58 of the act and 55 of the act of 2003. both sections permit demand of interest to be raised if it is crystallized tax demand and thereafter, the demanded amount had ..... petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the respondents-state of rajasthan.2. the petitioner no.1 is a public limited company registered under the indian companies act, 1956 with its registered office at ambujanagar, taluka kodinar, district ghirsomnath, gujarat. the petitioner no.2 is shareholder and vice-president of ..... deferred amount payable by the assessee. this notification was subsequently amended on 24.8.2007, whereby the computation of the value of the deferred amount was amended/modified.17. the petitioner-company wrote to the director, commercial taxes department on 3.9.2009 giving full particulars of the pre- payment, which was ..... judgment in indian council for enviro legal action v/s union of india & ors. ((2011) 8 scc161, which provided that restitution must be from the day the creditor is liable to pay.49. it is submitted that under section 58 of the act, which is similar to section 55 of the act of 2003 .....
Tag this Judgment!