Court : Rajasthan Jaipur
1. Instant petition has been filed by M/s BD & P Hotels (India) (P) Ltd who was in possession of Hotel Mukandgarh Resorts since 04/08/2009 on having purchased lease hold rights through respondent-6 (secured creditor) under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Financial Assets & Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), but has been dispossessed on 09/03/2010 pursuant to warrant of possession issued by the Executing Court, Jhunjhunu on 05/03/2010 in Execution Appl.No.35/2009) at the behest of decree holder in execution of Arbitral Award dt. 15/02/2009 passed for recovery of possession and arrears along with interest against its lessee (respondent-5), possession whereof was taken over by secured creditor (TFCI-respondent-6) with whom lease hold rights were mortgaged creating security interest by respondent-5 with the consent of lessor (respondent-2 to 4) on 22/08/2008. Question arising for consideration in instant case is as to whether petitioner in whose favour lease hold...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1974]44CompCas445(Raj); [1974]95ITR488(Raj); 1973()WLN567
Tyagi, J. 1. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), New Delhi, and the Income-tax Officer, Central Circle III, Jaipur, have filed this special appeal under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956, read with Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, against the order of the learned company judge dated 22nd March, 1972., [1974] 94 I.T.R. 11; [1974] 44 Comp. Cas. 144 (Raj.)2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are, in a nutshell, as follows : After Messrs. Golcha Properties (Private) Ltd. (hereinafter called ' the company ') was ordered on 10th May, 1968, to be wound up, the Income-tax Officer, Central Circle-I, Jaipur (who was then the assessing authority for the said company), sent a letter on 29th August, 1961, to the official liquidator, notifying to the company that Rs. 41 lakhs were payable or likely to be payable as income-tax by the company to the department and, therefore, he was specifically directed to set apart this amount under Section 178 of the Income-tax ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.1211/2014 Bhanwar Lal vs. State & ors. a/w 6 connected matters Judgment dt:26/11/2014 1/83 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (i) Bhanwar Lal vs. State of Rajasthan & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1211/2014 (ii) Rajendra Prasad Gora vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6249/2014. (iii) Tara Chand & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6250/2014 (iv) Ravindra Mohan Sharma vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6252/2014. (v) Balwant Singh vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6253/2014. (vi) Joga Ram & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6254/2014. (vii) Lokendra Kumar Charoria vs. State & Anr. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6255/2014. DATE OF JUDGMENT :26. h November, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr.Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Sharma, ]. Mr.A.K.Choudhary, ]. for the petitioners. Mr.Mahaveer Pareek ]. Mr. N.L.Verma ]. Mr. J.P.Joshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Joshi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.1211/2014 Bhanwar Lal vs. State & ors. a/w 6 connected matters Judgment dt:26/11/2014 1/83 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (i) Bhanwar Lal vs. State of Rajasthan & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1211/2014 (ii) Rajendra Prasad Gora vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6249/2014. (iii) Tara Chand & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6250/2014 (iv) Ravindra Mohan Sharma vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6252/2014. (v) Balwant Singh vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6253/2014. (vi) Joga Ram & Ors. vs. R.P.S.C. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6254/2014. (vii) Lokendra Kumar Charoria vs. State & Anr. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6255/2014. DATE OF JUDGMENT :26. h November, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr.Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Sharma, ]. Mr.A.K.Choudhary, ]. for the petitioners. Mr.Mahaveer Pareek ]. Mr. N.L.Verma ]. Mr. J.P.Joshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Joshi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL MISC.APPEAL NO.917/2011 M/s. Perfect Thread Mills Limited Vs The Competent Authority (Land Acquisition) cum SDO, Girwa & Anr. Date of Judgment ::17. h November 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Manish Singhvi and Mr.Anjay Kothari for the appellant Mr.Akhilesh Rajpurohit and Mr.Vinit Sanadhya for the respondent No.2 NHAI Reportable BY THE COURT: Appellant, a company duly registered under the Companies Act, 1956 has laid this appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act of 1996') to assail the impugned order dated 05.02.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No.3, Udaipur (for short 'the learned court below') as well as the award dated 02.01.2007 rendered by Arbitral Tribunal and the award dated 11.08.2006 passed by the Competent Authority (LA)-cum-Sub Divisional Officer, Girwa insofar as the same relate to compensation for acquisition of l...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!