Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-10-2014
..... the plaintiff and obtained a judgment which the plaintiff was compelled to satisfy, the plaintiff was not entitled to sue the defendant. justice chagla held that the indian contract act is an amending and consolidating legislation and is not exhaustive of the law of contract to be applied by courts in india. the learned judge held that if the indemnified ..... the appellant. the liability to pay the service tax arises out of the service provided by the respondent. there is no dispute that in view of the above referred amendment of 2000, the appellant as the recipient of the service is the assessee under the service tax law. however, there is no prohibition in the law against shifting ..... rs.50 crores. once the court comes to the conclusion that there was a failure on the part of sahara to fulfill its indemnity obligations in the spa, as amended by the consent terms, the liability of jet to pay the additional sum of rs.550/- crores did not arise.? 6. dr. sathe learned senior counsel then submits .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
..... on the date of coming into force of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control, bombay land requisition and bombay government premises (eviction) (amendment) act, 1996 (hereinafter in this section referred to as 'the said date') (a) the state government in respect of the premises requisitioned or continued under requisition ..... the date of coming into force of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control, bombay land requisition and bombay government premises (eviction)(amendment) act, 1996, are allowed by the state government to remain in their occupation and possession, means the principal officer-in-charge of such office or ..... to the allottees of the requisitioned by providing for the state government of the government allottees becoming deemed tenants of the requisitioned premises. by the amendment act, clause 1a defining "government allottee" was inserted. another new provision inserted was section 15b providing for the state government or government allottees to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
..... on the date of coming into force of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control, bombay land requisition and bombay government premises (eviction) (amendment) act, 1996 (hereinafter in this section referred to as 'the said date') (a) the state government in respect of the premises requisitioned or continued under requisition ..... the date of coming into force of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control, bombay land requisition and bombay government premises (eviction)(amendment) act, 1996, are allowed by the state government to remain in their occupation and possession, means the principal officer-in-charge of such office or ..... to the allottees of the requisitioned by providing for the state government of the government allottees becoming deemed tenants of the requisitioned premises. by the amendment act, clause 1a defining "government allottee" was inserted. another new provision inserted was section 15b providing for the state government or government allottees to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-01-2014
..... the circular issued by the government of india, ministry of railways/ rail mantralaya/ railway board on 05.08.1997 on the caption amendment to indian railway establishment code volume ii. in view of the amendment made in rule 2433, similar amendment was proposed in para 4 to 6(1) of the manual of railway pension rules, 1950. under the said ..... 18.06.2012. 2. the facts of the case in brief may be stated as under: that in pursuance of railway sports promotion board's (rspb) of the indian railways talent scouting quota, the applicant was offered the post of junior clerk group 'c' in higher pay scale as outstanding sportsman. after undergoing the necessary tests, ..... same was rejected. the applicant bonafide desires to prosecute the higher studies and paid rs.1,25,000/-towards fees for the said course. thus, the respondents acted unreasonably by refusing to grant the study leave for 18 months especially when no prejudice should have been caused to the railway administration by grant of such leave. .....
Tag this Judgment!