Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-20-2014
..... . against the defendants. the case set up by the plaintiff in the plaint is as under :2. the plaintiff earlier a public limited company incorporated under the indian companies act has been converted into a private limited company. mr.manoj dabke is the authorized signatory of the plaintiff to institute the present suit. it is further averred that the ..... application to bring on record his legal heirs was moved on record. defendant no.2 was also proceeded ex-parte by an order dated 31.05.2013. the amended memo of parties was filed excluding the name of defendant no.3. the plaintiff was permitted to file affidavit by way of evidence by an order dated 22.05 ..... by it has been described in detail. all these features are artistic features and constitute the original artistic features within the meaning of section 2(c) of the indian copyright act. the plaintiff is the owner of the copyright therein and is using it continuously and regularly since the year 1989.3. it is further pleaded that on account .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-20-2014
..... . against the defendants. the case set up by the plaintiff in the plaint is as under :2. the plaintiff earlier a public limited company incorporated under the indian companies act has been converted into a private limited company. mr.manoj dabke is the authorized signatory of the plaintiff to institute the present suit. it is further averred that the ..... application to bring on record his legal heirs was moved on record. defendant no.2 was also proceeded ex-parte by an order dated 31.05.2013. the amended memo of parties was filed excluding the name of defendant no.3. the plaintiff was permitted to file affidavit by way of evidence by an order dated 22.05 ..... by it has been described in detail. all these features are artistic features and constitute the original artistic features within the meaning of section 2(c) of the indian copyright act. the plaintiff is the owner of the copyright therein and is using it continuously and regularly since the year 1989.3. it is further pleaded that on account .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-20-2014
..... . against the defendants. the case set up by the plaintiff in the plaint is as under :2. the plaintiff earlier a public limited company incorporated under the indian companies act has been converted into a private limited company. mr.manoj dabke is the authorized signatory of the plaintiff to institute the present suit. it is further averred that the ..... application to bring on record his legal heirs was moved on record. defendant no.2 was also proceeded ex-parte by an order dated 31.05.2013. the amended memo of parties was filed excluding the name of defendant no.3. the plaintiff was permitted to file affidavit by way of evidence by an order dated 22.05 ..... by it has been described in detail. all these features are artistic features and constitute the original artistic features within the meaning of section 2(c) of the indian copyright act. the plaintiff is the owner of the copyright therein and is using it continuously and regularly since the year 1989.3. it is further pleaded that on account .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-19-2014
..... and would sue and be sued in the name of its director general. there will be no share-holders. all provisions of the societies registration act (act xxi of 1860) (punjab amendment act, 1957) as extended to the union territory of delhi will apply to this organization. the awho consist of two wings viz:(a) board of ..... to exercise their functions in accordance with the charter of the appellant, honestly and reasonably.15. notice may however be taken of pradeep kumar biswas vs. indian institute of chemical biology (2002) 5 scc111where, in the context of the prime minister being the ex-officio president of the council for scientific and ..... ) relying on thalappalam service co-operative bank ltd. vs. state of kerala (2013) 12 scale527holding that a cooperative society registered under the kerala cooperative societies act, 1969 will not fall within the definition of public authority for the reasons: (i) merely because the registrar of cooperative societies exercises supervisory and regulatory powers .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-19-2014
..... and would sue and be sued in the name of its director general. there will be no share-holders. all provisions of the societies registration act (act xxi of 1860) (punjab amendment act, 1957) as extended to the union territory of delhi will apply to this organization. the awho consist of two wings viz:(a) board of ..... to exercise their functions in accordance with the charter of the appellant, honestly and reasonably.15. notice may however be taken of pradeep kumar biswas vs. indian institute of chemical biology (2002) 5 scc111where, in the context of the prime minister being the ex-officio president of the council for scientific and ..... ) relying on thalappalam service co-operative bank ltd. vs. state of kerala (2013) 12 scale527holding that a cooperative society registered under the kerala cooperative societies act, 1969 will not fall within the definition of public authority for the reasons: (i) merely because the registrar of cooperative societies exercises supervisory and regulatory powers .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-19-2014
..... 1st june, 1992 and 3rd july, 1992 constitute a lease or at least an agreement to renew the lease falling within the provisions of section 2(7) of the indian registration act, since the agreement to renew the lease by virtue of these two letters in writing and these having not been registered, no right can be enforced by the appellant ..... object of order 12 rule 6, we need not say anything more than what the legislature itself has said when the said provision came to be amended. in the objects and reasons set out while amending the said rule, it is stated that where a claim is admitted, the court has jurisdiction to enter a judgment for the plaintiff and to ..... be looked into for the purpose of enforcing a right flowing there from.13. the argument of mr. amitabh narayan is that proviso to section 49 of the registration act protects the appellant to the extent that these unregistered letters can be received in evidence for the purpose of enforcing the right under section 53a of the transfer of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-18-2014
..... outdoor policy. however, in so far as levy of tax or regulatory fee is concerned, the same would require a legislative framework (either by way of an amendment to the dmc act or by a separate statutory enactment). the direction that mcd may go ahead with implementation of the policy, notwithstanding any order passed by any court would not in ..... its way into the treasury of the branch of the government whose officer or officers collect the charge is not a fee but a tax. 23. under the indian constitution the state government's power to levy a tax is not identical with that of its power to levy a fee. while the powers to levy taxes is ..... displayed in any manner whatsoever in any place within delhi without the written permission of the commissioner granted in accordance with bye-laws made under the relevant provisions of dmc act, 1957 and the outdoor advertisement policy as approved by the hon ble supreme court on the following terms & conditions:1. to take damages for putting up unauthorized .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-18-2014
..... outdoor policy. however, in so far as levy of tax or regulatory fee is concerned, the same would require a legislative framework (either by way of an amendment to the dmc act or by a separate statutory enactment). the direction that mcd may go ahead with implementation of the policy, notwithstanding any order passed by any court would not in ..... its way into the treasury of the branch of the government whose officer or officers collect the charge is not a fee but a tax. 23. under the indian constitution the state government's power to levy a tax is not identical with that of its power to levy a fee. while the powers to levy taxes is ..... displayed in any manner whatsoever in any place within delhi without the written permission of the commissioner granted in accordance with bye-laws made under the relevant provisions of dmc act, 1957 and the outdoor advertisement policy as approved by the hon ble supreme court on the following terms & conditions:1. to take damages for putting up unauthorized .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-18-2014
..... outdoor policy. however, in so far as levy of tax or regulatory fee is concerned, the same would require a legislative framework (either by way of an amendment to the dmc act or by a separate statutory enactment). the direction that mcd may go ahead with implementation of the policy, notwithstanding any order passed by any court would not in ..... its way into the treasury of the branch of the government whose officer or officers collect the charge is not a fee but a tax. 23. under the indian constitution the state government's power to levy a tax is not identical with that of its power to levy a fee. while the powers to levy taxes is ..... displayed in any manner whatsoever in any place within delhi without the written permission of the commissioner granted in accordance with bye-laws made under the relevant provisions of dmc act, 1957 and the outdoor advertisement policy as approved by the hon ble supreme court on the following terms & conditions:1. to take damages for putting up unauthorized .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-18-2014
..... received a copy of the notice when served with the documents in the suit, once again, the period of 15 days has expired thereafter and keeping the legislative intendment of amended section 106 in view, the appellant therefore cannot argue that the tenancy is not terminated and he did not get a period of 15 days to vacate the premises. i ..... the suit could not have been filed, fails for this reason also. in this regard, i am keeping in view the amendment brought about to section 106 of the transfer of property act by act 3 of 2003 and as per which amendment no objection with regard to termination of tenancy is permitted on the ground that the legal notice did not validly terminate ..... is an oral agreement to sell and no oral agreement to sell can create rights under section 53-a of the act much less cmm10092012 after the amendment of a of the act w.e.f 24.9.2001 and as per which amendment agreement to sell in the nature of part performance cannot be looked into unless it is stamped at 90% value .....
Tag this Judgment!