Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 3 amendment of section 2 Sorted by: old Court: jammu and kashmir Page 3 of about 131 results (1.693 seconds)

United Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Lakshmi Shori ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... difference whether the proceedings for the recovery of compensation were by way of a suit is a civil court, before the amendment act of 1956, or by way of an application in a claims tribunal, after the said amendment. it also makes no difference whether the insurer entered in appearance and filed his written statement after a notice was issued ..... the same view following its earlier judgments and the supreme court judgment in itbar singh's case (air 1959 sc 1331) in 1966 acc cj 203 (mad.) 24. in indian merchantile insurance co. ltd. v. chamla devi, 1980 acc cj 169 (punj & har) it was held that an insurance company cannot raise any argument regarding quantum of compensation ..... appeal no. 15 of 1978, mohi-ud-din v. ghulam mohammad shah, dealing with the point at issue. in view of the divergence of opinion expressed by the indian high courts on this subject and in view of the recent judgment of this court, it would be appropriate to refer the case to the full bench. accordingly the case .....

P.C. Oswal Vs. S.P. Mehta, Wealth-tax Officer

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : (1983)35CTR(J& K)194,[1983]142ITR574(J& K)

..... singk dhillon : [1972]83itr582(sc) ,7. in the case of h. s. dhillon the legislative competence of parliament in relation to the amendment of the relevant provisions of the w.t. act having the effect of including the capital value of agricultural lands in computing the net wealth for the purposes of wealth-tax was challenged. the supreme ..... cession of a part of the territory of india or secession of a part of the territory of india from the union or causing insult to the indian national flag, the indian national anthem and this constitution; taxes on foreign travel by sea or air, on inland air travel and on postal articles, including money-orders, phonograms ..... bringing about cession of a part of the territory of india or secession of a part of the territory of india from the union or causing insult to the indian national flag, the indian national anthem and this constitution ; and, (b) taxes on- (i) foreign travel by sea or air; (ii) inland air travel; (iii) postal articles, including .....

Kashmir Motor Drivers Association and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) an ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1983J& K100

..... through the medium of this writ petition, the petitioners, out of whomthe first petitioner, namely, the kashmir motor drivers union, is a company registered under the indian companies act of 1956, which operates as many as 486 passenger buses, and the second petitioner, namely, the western bus stand is a union of transporters, which also ..... such risks. arbitrariness or unreasonableness in such cases is rendered inconsequential.23. thirdly, what the t. a. c. has to keep in mind in fixing, amending or modifying the rates, advantages etc. is the past or prospective loss experience, besides random fluctuations and unforeseen circumstances. this is borne out from sub-section (2 ..... he is satisfied that such insurer generally issued policies only to a restricted class of the public or under a restricted category of risks.(2) in fixing, amending or modifying any rates, advantages, terms or conditions, relating to any risk, the advisory committee shall try to ensure, as far as possible, that there .....

R.B. Jodhamal Bishen Lal and ors. Vs. the State of Jammu and Kashmir a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1984J& K10

..... hereunder or annexed herewith) within ... ... ... years stipulated hereby, and reflected in the prescribed extension agreement executed by the parties hereto, and accordingly incorporated by adding amendment slips in the principal agreement (extension of time granted to be in proportion with the salvage requirements).' 15. working period of a lease would be normally fixed according to ..... is no reason why it should be given only a limited application by way of defence. x x x x x x xwhen we turn to the indian law on the subject it is heartening, to find that in india not only has the doctrine of promissory estoppel been adopted in its fulness but it ..... as private individuals are to carry out obligations incurred by them because parties seeking to bind the authorities have altered their position to their disadvantage or have acted to their detriment on the strength of the representations made by these authorities. the high court thought that in such cases the obligation could sometimes be .....

Ghulam Ahmad and anr. Vs. Habiba

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1986J& K28

..... a tenant but a trespasser;e) all other cases of dispute including those where the party in possession pleads adverse possession against the recorded owner/intermediary.' by amending act of 1981 (act no. viii of 1981) in place of clause (e) of sub-section (3) of section 19, the following clause is substituted :'(e) any other ..... for.6. in order to resolve the abovesaid controversy, it will be convenient to discuss the provisions of section 19 as they stood in the 1976 act and substituted thereafter by the amending act of 1981.section 19, sub-section (3), reads as under :--'(3) the following applications, suits and proceedings shall be disposed of by a collector ..... that the legislature in its widsom substituted the provisions of section 19, sub-section (3), clause (e) as it stood in 1976 act by providing an amendment to the said provision by the amending act of 1981 taken away the jurisdiction which was wide enough under the previous clause, which is now made limited and, therefore, the case .....

Piaray Lal Karihaloo Vs. Ghulam Mohamad Bhat and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1986J& K32

..... the discrepancies were typographical and clerical and had not prejudiced the returned candidate. in this connection mr. khan pointed that in the written statement filed before the amendment, the returned candidate had nowhere alleged that he had been prejudiced by the variations in the original election petition and the copy served on him. learned ..... to it because there is no allegation against the congress party, though, cleverly in the original petition the petitioner has levelled the allegation against 'nc' i.e. indian national congress, which abbreviation has been used at numerous places in the petition to describe the party of the petitioner. again, so far as variation no. 13 ..... should have been dismissed under section 86(1) of the act for non-compliance with section 82(b) of the act. on behalf of the petitioner this objection was sought to be met by urging that after the election petition had been amended it was only the amended petition which could be looked into and that the defect .....

Mst. Phungan Vs. Chhajju Ram

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1986J& K78

..... however, further investigation of facts is not necessary, the court would be justified in giving the plaintiff relief under the provisions of section 65 of the indian contract act even without a formal amendment of the plaint :' in another authority reported as air 1943 pc 29 mohan manucha v. manzoor ahmad khan, the plaintiffs sued to enforce a registered ..... dismissed the suit. before the chief court on appeal, it was contended for the plaintiffs that they were at least entitled to relief under section 65 of the indian contract act. the chief court, however, left the plaintiffs to seek their remedy by a separate suit, since the matter was not pleaded. on appeal, to the privy council ..... relied upon by the defendant. he observed : 'i have, therefore, come to the conclusion that the mere fact that a claim under section 65 of the indian contract act on the basis that the contract had been discovered to be void, was not made by the plaintiff in his plaint, is not by itself a sufficient reason .....

Jamil Shaheen and anr. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1682

..... the grounds and were informed that they have been detained vide the orders quoted above respectively. in the petitions amendment of section 10-a issued vide ordinance no. 11 of the 1984, which later on became the amendment act of 1985 was also challenged, but the same was not pressed before the division bench and hence the petitions ..... against the constitution. you asked the participants that they should hoist pakistani flags at all religious places. you again challenged the accession of the state with the indian union and further said that the late sheikh mohd. abdullah or any other kashmir leader had no right to acceed to india against the wishes of the people ..... that they should hoist green pakistani flags on govt. buildings and religious places. at the conclusion of the meeting, anti-national slogans like we want pakistan, pakistan zindabad, indian dogs go back etc; were raised.in habeas corpus petn. no. 158 of 1985, grounds nos. 4 and 6 are sufficient for the present consideration:(4) on .....

Mohammad HussaIn and Etc. Etc. Vs. Rahim and anr., Etc. Etc.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1987J& K48

..... to call in question an order of an officer or authority, if the same does not relate to or arise out of the act. however, let us first advert to the effect of section 19(3)(e) of the amended act of 1981 and its effect on the civil courts jurisdiction.10. a division bench of this court in ghulam mohd v. habiba ..... with by a civil court. only such matters which arise out of the act and relate to the act are to be dealt with by the authorities or officers under the act. so any matter which the amending act of 1981 excludes from the jurisdiction of authorities or the officers under the act is to be dealt with by a civil court. this is by operation ..... bench judgment of this court namely jagtu v. badri reported in supplement to jklr vol. x hold good even after clause (e) of section 19 of the act has been amended by virtue of act no. viii of 1981? ii) whose opinion will prevail where the civil court says that certain disputes raised in the suit before it are triable by the collector .....

Lt. Col. H.N. Tripathi Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1988CriLJ582

..... offences committed by them in the state because the special judge, anti-corruption, being a creature of the criminal law (amendment) act of the state is not competent to try any member of the indian armed forces. reliance in this connection was placed on article 246 of the constitution of india to urge that parliament ..... exclusive jurisdiction to try offences covered by section 6 of the criminal law [amendment) act, 1952?(emphasis supplied)18. sections 6 and 7 of the criminal law (amendment) act 1952 (central) being identical to those of the state criminal law (amendment) act, 1958, and the army act being the same, the law on this question stands concluded and is ..... expired when the objection was initially raised before the trial court.secondly, because offences punishable under section 5(2), p.c. act are exclusively triable by the special judge appointed under the criminal law (amendment) act of 1958, as held by the apex court in major e. g. barsay v. state of bombay : 1961crilj828 . their .....