Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 3 amendment of section 2 Sorted by: old Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 57 results (0.225 seconds)

Jan 02 2014 (HC)

Dr. C.L.Venkat Rao Vs. Dr. N.T.R.University of Healthsciences

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-2014

..... by 10-11-2013 and as such members are to be elected under section 3 (1) (b) of the indian medical council act before 31- 08-2013. it was also informed that indian medical council rules, 1957 as amended in 1980 would be applicable for electing a member under section 3 (1)(b) and pursuant to the said notice, ..... be referred to the central government whose decision shall be final. as per rule 25 (1) of the indian medical council rules, 1957 as amended by virtue of powers conferred by sections 4 and 32 of the indian medical council act, 1956, the central government may, on objection made by a candidate for any election within a period of ..... ".medical faculty". and constitute ".faculty". as per section 25 of the dr. ntr university of health sciences act, 1986, for directing the 2nd respondent to frame appropriate rules pursuant to amendment to section 3 (1) (b) proviso of indian medical council ordinance, 2013 for laying down the procedure for election of members from health universities, and for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 2014 (HC)

Dr. C.L.Venkat Rao Vs. Dr.N.T.R.University of Healthsciences

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-2014

..... by 10-11-2013 and as such members are to be elected under section 3 (1) (b) of the indian medical council act before 31- 08-2013. it was also informed that indian medical council rules, 1957 as amended in 1980 would be applicable for electing a member under section 3 (1)(b) and pursuant to the said notice, ..... be referred to the central government whose decision shall be final. as per rule 25 (1) of the indian medical council rules, 1957 as amended by virtue of powers conferred by sections 4 and 32 of the indian medical council act, 1956, the central government may, on objection made by a candidate for any election within a period of ..... ".medical faculty". and constitute ".faculty". as per section 25 of the dr. ntr university of health sciences act, 1986, for directing the 2nd respondent to frame appropriate rules pursuant to amendment to section 3 (1) (b) proviso of indian medical council ordinance, 2013 for laying down the procedure for election of members from health universities, and for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2014 (HC)

Adityaeducational Society, Rep., by Its Vs. the Union OfIndia Rep., by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2014

..... be considered for renewal; the provisos relate only to these two deficiencies; and there is a conscious departure therein from other possible deficiencies. the indian medical council act (hereinafter called the 'act') is referable to entry 66 of list i (union list) of the seventh schedule to the constitution. (mci v. state of karnataka1). ..... capacity of undergraduate medical courses in medical colleges for the academic year 2013-2014, only to government medical colleges. the establishment of medical college regulations (amendment) 2012, provides for a time schedule for the m.c.i to grant letters of permission for establishment of a medical college as well as an ..... departure from the standards laid down in the regulations, or for carving out an exception in favour of any identifiable class of persons, it should then have amended the regulations after previous sanction of the central government. (gopal d. tirthani52).in dr. b.r.ambedkar medical college v. union of india54 the notification .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2014 (HC)

Smt.Waheeda Begum and or Vs. Md.Yakub and and O

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2014

..... supra), cited by the counsel for the respondents, also does not apply to the present case because the said case dealt with amendment to an election petition under the representation of the people act, 1951, where admittedly the law is particularly strict when compared to ordinary civil suits. on the facts of that case, there was ..... bhan singh (14 supra), cited by the counsel for the respondents which held that article 113 of the limitation act, 1963 is attracted, need not be considered in this revision. the court below, after allowing the amendment sought by the petitioners, and after allowing the respondents to file additional written statement, shall frame an issue on ..... claimed by the petitioners, and then decide it keeping in view the circumstances in which the amendment had been sought by the petitioners and section 17 of the limitation act, 1963.43. the petitioners have also sought to amend the plaint by adding a relief claiming 7/14th share in mesne profits for alleged illegal use .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2014 (HC)

T.Lingaiah S/O. Mallaiah and Other Vs. the Government of A.P., Rep.by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2014

..... the principles of good governance in a democratic society is that smaller interest mush always give way to larger public interest in case of conflict. the amendment resulting in curtailing of the period appointed for inviting objections though restricted the period, by shortening it to the extent necessary in the then circumstances, it ..... under: "....... the legislature has though fit to empower the commissioner to cancel a notification issued by him under sec.3 (1) of the gram panchayats act in the several circumstances enumerated in r.12 of the declaration of village rules. when a gram panchayat is sought to be included within an adjoining municipality ..... to the siddipet town. learned counsel also contended that there was total non-application of mind and mechanical determination of issue violating spirit of panchayat raj act and the constitutional mandate. he further contends that the objections filed by the petitioners were not even considered and no reasons are assigned. the objections .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2014 (TRI)

Mondi Murali Krishna Vs. Maijo Joseph, Managing Director Georg Maijo I ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jan-20-2014

..... case the defects developed within the period of warranty. 21. the decisions have no application to the facts of the case in view of amendment to the consumer protection act by act no.62 of 2002 which was brought into force with effect from 15.03.2003 and in the light of the decision of the honble supreme court in birla ..... , ansari road, darya ganj, new delhi.? 8. by this admission, the complaint will fall within the exception clause contained in section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the consumer protection act, as amended in 2002. in terms of this provision, the rp/complainant does not qualify to be a consumer for the purposes of the consumer protection ..... act, 1986. therefore, in our view, the state consumer disputes redressal commission uttrakhand has rightly rejected the consumer complaint filed by the revision petitioner. 16. in birla technologies ltd vs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2014 (HC)

Boya Kothi Lakshmanna (A-13) Andanot Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. Byp.P. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-21-2014

..... 2009. in the course of trial for the offences under sections 147, 148, 324, 326, 307, 302 r/w 149 of ipc, sections 3, 4, and 6 of explosive substances act and section 25(1-b)(b) and 27 of arms act. they filed a petition before the ii additional sessions judge, kurnool at adoni who is trying the said case to appoint .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2014 (HC)

Smt.S.Swarnalaxm Vs. the State of A.P., Rep.by Its Public Pro

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-2014

..... , eluru requires any interference in this revision ?. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that after introduction of section 53a of cr.p.c., (amendment act, 2005).a police officer not below the rank of sub inspector can request the medical officer to conduct examination of the accused person and can use such force ..... stage, the petitioner/de facto complainant filed a petition before the trial court under sections 53a and 164 of cr.p.c., r/w. section 45 of indian evidence act, seeking second dna test. according to the de facto complainant, the said petition was not received by the learned assistant sessions judge and she filed a criminal ..... de facto complainant filed a petition before the learned assistant sessions judge under sections 53a, 164-a of cr.p.c., r/w. section 45 of the indian evidence act for again collecting blood samples of the respondent/accused and the minor boy for the purpose of sending them for second dna test to another forensic science laboratory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2014 (HC)

Sheikh QutubuddIn S/O. Shaik Ahmed and a Vs. Goli Vishwanatham S/O. Ma ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-2014

..... when a document is admitted, no court including the appellate court has jurisdiction to reopen the issue of admission of such document. reliance was placed on section 36 of the indian stamp act in support of such proposition. in shyamal kumar roy, supreme court considered the contention to reopen issue of admissibility of a document where initially no such objection was raised .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2014 (HC)

Sri Kolliboina Veerraju Andanoth Vs. the Special Grade Deputy Collecto ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-23-2014

..... payable to the land owners.who failed to seek reference is the compensation which is ultimately payable to the land owners who sought reference under section 18 of the act as modified in further appeals. therefore, the reason shown by the respondent herein in the counter cannot stand for scrutiny by this court. for the aforesaid reasons ..... the reference court was subsequently reduced by the superior court. there can be no dispute that those claiming higher compensation and claiming reference under section 18 of the act are bound by the decree as modified by the superior court in appeal. the principle of restitution must apply to them. for the same reason, the same ..... by the reference court was subsequently reduced by superior court. there can be no dispute that those claiming higher compensation and claiming reference under section 18 of the act are bound by the decree as modified by the superior court in appeal. the principle of restitution must apply to them. for the same reason, the same .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //