Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 3 amendment of section 2 Court: mumbai nagpur Year: 2014 Page 4 of about 32 results (0.196 seconds)

Feb 27 2014 (HC)

Shrikrushna Narayan Tupkari Vs. Mahadeo and Another

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Feb-27-2014

..... apex court as above, ought to be taken care of by the parliament as well as state legislature. the state legislature ought to extend the said amendment of bombay act no.14/1939 to the entire state of maharashtra rather than resting it only to greater bombay. except saying this, this court cannot say anything more. ..... (e) the date on which the suit or proceeding was instituted.? (emphasis supplied) 21. we hope that the law commission and parliament considers such amendment or other suitable amendment to cover the existing void in title verification or due diligence procedures. provision can also be made for compulsory registration of such notice sin respect of decrees ..... to immovable property is directly and specifically in question, if a notice of the pendency of such suit or proceeding is registered under section 18 of the indian registration act, 1908, the property after the notice is so registered cannot be transferred or otherwise dealt with by any party to the suit or proceeding so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2014 (HC)

Radhyesham Ramkaran Choube Vs. A.S. Mogare, through L. Rs. and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Oct-30-2014

..... had purchased the suit property as per sale deed dated 28.12.1979. during pendency of the appeal before the district court, the plaintiff had sought to amend the plaint by raising additional plea that as the defendants had denied the status of the plaintiff as their landlord, the plaintiff was entitled for possession. ..... permission of the controller would not be necessary for giving a notice determining the lease as contemplated by clause (g) of section 111 of the transfer of property act. the suit was therefore maintainable, even without obtaining the permission of the controller, the reference is answered accordingly. it is, therefore, clear that the benefit of ..... landlord and his relationship of tenancy literally knocks out the very bottom of statutory protection, and this amounts to disclaiming the benefits available under the bombay rent act. it was pointed out that a tenant disclaims the title of his landlord who accepts such disclaimer and seeks eviction upon the basis thereof, and the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //