Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : Apr-25-2014
..... incumbent upon him to carry out an enquiry or order investigation as contemplated under section 202 crpc before issuing the process." after referring to amendment made in section 202 of cr.pc. by the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 2005, in this regard it was further observed in para 11 as under:- "11. we are of the view that the high ..... court has correctly held that the abovementioned amendment was not noticed by the cjm, ahmednagar. the cjm had failed to carry out any enquiry or ..... applicants has submitted that offence was registered at nehrunagar police station, mumbai bearing crime no.204 of 2013 under sections 494, 498a, 420, 504, 506 read with 34 of the indian penal code, and for the same offence respondent no.2 filed private complaint (m.a. no.9 of 2014) r.c.c. no.19 of 2014 before the court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on : Mar-05-2014
..... corporation vs. lakshmidevamma - air 2001 sc 2090 (five judges' bench) was not considered by the labour court, which rejected the application of the petitioner and allowed the amendment application of the respondent. this order dated 26.12.2005 was not immediately challenged by the petitioner. 14. it is further submitted that the labour court considered the ..... regarding the defeat in the domestic enquiry by the written statement of defence filed by him in the application filed by the management under section 33 of the act. then, if the management chooses to exercise its right it must make up its mind at the earliest stage and file the application for that purpose without ..... any unreasonable delay. but when the question arises in a reference under s.10 of the act after the workman had been punished pursuant to a finding of guilt recorded against him in the domestic enquiry there is no question of the management filing any .....
Tag this Judgment!