Court : Meghalaya State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shillong
..... -b applicable on them?no. private and public service providers are not telegraph authority. further, only central govt. can appoint arbitrator under section 7b of indian telegraph act.(b)can private and public service providers as telecom authority appoint arbitrators for arbitration of disputes? yours faithfully,sd/-(misha bajpai)assistant director general (php)tel. ..... for providing specified public telecommunication services; 2 (ea)licensor means the central government or the telegraph authority who grants a licence under section 4 of the indian telegraph act, 1885 (13 of 1885); 2 (j) service provider means the government as a service provider and includes a licensee; if bsnl were to claim to ..... a telegraph authority. in view of the definitions of telegraph line and telegraph authority as contained in sections 3(4) and 3(6) of the indian telegraph act, 1885, which we have quoted above, it can therefore be said that the dispute was in respect of a telegraph line besides also being between a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Meghalaya State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shillong
..... 7.b applicable on themno. private and public service providers are not telegraph authority. further, only central govt. can appoint arbitrator under section 7b of indian telegraph act. b.can private and public service providers as telecom authority appoint arbitrators for arbitration of disputes yours faithfully,sd..misha bajpaiassistant director general phptel.23036027 e. ..... for providing specified public telecommunication services. 2. ea. licensor means the central government or the telegraph authority who grants a licence under section 4 of the indian telegraph act, 1885 13 of 1885. 2. j. service provider means the government as a service provider and includes a licensee. if bsnl were to claim to ..... also a telegraph authority. in view of the definitions of telegraph line and telegraph authority as contained in sections 3 4 and 3 6 of the indian telegraph act, 1885, which we have quoted above, it can therefore be said that the dispute was in respect of a telegraph line besides also being .....
Tag this Judgment!