Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... struck down, such legislation must be manifestly arbitrary; the law which could not be reasonably expected to emanate from an authority delegated law making power. in the case of indian express news paper (bombay) (p) ltd., - vs- union of india, this court has held that a piece of subordinate legislation does not carry the same degree ..... video conference, the court made the following: order these writ petitions are filed to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 and also to declare that the notification dated 23.9.2016 issued by respondent no.1 and the consequential intimation dated 6.10 ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... struck down, such legislation must be manifestly arbitrary; the law which could not be reasonably expected to emanate from an authority delegated law making power. in the case of indian express news paper (bombay) (p) ltd., - vs- union of india, this court has held that a piece of subordinate legislation does not carry the same degree ..... video conference, the court made the following: order these writ petitions are filed to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 and also to declare that the notification dated 23.9.2016 issued by respondent no.1 and the consequential intimation dated 6.10 ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... struck down, such legislation must be manifestly arbitrary; the law which could not be reasonably expected to emanate from an authority delegated law making power. in the case of indian express news paper (bombay) (p) ltd., - vs- union of india, this court has held that a piece of subordinate legislation does not carry the same degree ..... video conference, the court made the following: order these writ petitions are filed to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 and also to declare that the notification dated 23.9.2016 issued by respondent no.1 and the consequential intimation dated 6.10 ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... struck down, such legislation must be manifestly arbitrary; the law which could not be reasonably expected to emanate from an authority delegated law making power. in the case of indian express news paper (bombay) (p) ltd., - vs- union of india, this court has held that a piece of subordinate legislation does not carry the same degree ..... video conference, the court made the following: order these writ petitions are filed to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 and also to declare that the notification dated 23.9.2016 issued by respondent no.1 and the consequential intimation dated 6.10 ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... struck down, such legislation must be manifestly arbitrary; the law which could not be reasonably expected to emanate from an authority delegated law making power. in the case of indian express news paper (bombay) (p) ltd., - vs- union of india, this court has held that a piece of subordinate legislation does not carry the same degree ..... video conference, the court made the following: order these writ petitions are filed to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 and also to declare that the notification dated 23.9.2016 issued by respondent no.1 and the consequential intimation dated 6.10 ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... struck down, such legislation must be manifestly arbitrary; the law which could not be reasonably expected to emanate from an authority delegated law making power. in the case of indian express news paper (bombay) (p) ltd., - vs- union of india, this court has held that a piece of subordinate legislation does not carry the same degree ..... video conference, the court made the following: order these writ petitions are filed to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 and also to declare that the notification dated 23.9.2016 issued by respondent no.1 and the consequential intimation dated 6.10 ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... ), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(za)(e), 3(1)(zc), 3(2) (va), 3(2)(vii) of the sc and st (prevention of atrocities) amendment act 2015 (for short the act) and section 217 r/w 34 of the ipc, pending on the file of the 2nd additional district sessions court, dharwad, hubli-dharwad.2. heard sri sunil s. desai, learned counsel for petitioner ..... ) (p) 3(1) (q) 3(1) (r) 3(1)(za) (e) 3(1) (zc) 3(2) (va) 3(2) (vii) of the sc and st (prevention of atrocities) amendment act2015and section217r/w34of ipc pending on the file of2d addl. district and sessions court dharwad sub-urban police station dharwad all further proceedings in connection with same in r/o accused no.1 ..... no.202/2022 for the offence punishable under section4iii) of protection of civil rights act, 1955, section31) (p), 3(1)(q), 3(1) (r) , 3 (1) (za) (e), 3 (1) (zc), 3(2) (va), 3(2) (vii) of the sc and st (prevention of atrocities) amendment act2015and section217r/w34of ipc pending on the file of2d add. district session court dharwad, hubli dharwad sub .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... its expiry, continue to be effective for a period of 30 days. 21 10. one other development that is relevant is the amendment of sub-section (2) of section 10 by the motor vehicles (amendment) act, 1994 in the said section, the following kinds of vehicles were specified: (e) medium goods vehicle, (f) medium passenger motor ..... transport vehicle incidentally, sub-section (2) of section 10 specifies light motor vehicle under clause (d), thereof. this clause has remained in place before and after the amendment.11. rule 16 of the central motor vehicle rules, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the cmv rules , for brevity) prescribes the form, in which a driving licence ..... national insurance company limited vs. kusum rai, (2006) 4 scc250 oriental insurance company limited vs. nanjappan and others, (2004)13 scc224 s. iyyappan vs. united indian insurance company limited, (2013) 7 scc62) 49 however, the liability of the insurer would not be attracted, in the above manner when the claim is by any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... victim was minor and she suffered penetrative sexual assault by the accused regularly for nearly two months. the said offence is punishable under section 6 of pocso act. section 6 of pocso act is amended with effect to 16.08.2019 wherein the minimum sentence is 20 years but in the instant case the offence is committed on 21.05.2014 and ..... 10. it is evident from the records that accused was convicted for the offence punishable under sections, 363, 342, 343, 376(i) and 506 of ipc and sections 4 and 5(l) of pocso act. though the accused had challenged the judgment of conviction in crl.a.no.100248/2018 initially, he withdrew the said appeal and the appeal came to ..... perusing the material evidence placed on record, has convicted the accused for the offences punishable under sections 363, 342, 343, 376(i) and 506 of ipc and sections 4 and 5(l) of pocso act and passed the following sentence: accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 5 years and to pay fine of 5 rs.10,000/- in default .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... given to the daughter and the wife in lieu of arrears of maintenance is to be treated as allotment of share in the partition?.18. section 6 of the act, which was amended in the year 2005 conferring the status of a coparcener to a daughter of a male hindu entertains few exceptions. alienation of properties before 20th december 2004 is an ..... , the daughter is given the status of a coparcener. assuming that plaintiff no.1 had no cause of action to file suit in the year 1995, as the amendment of section 6 of act, 2005 is held to be retrospective in operation, it must be deemed that the daughter had a share in the properties when the suit was filed in 1995 ..... 2007 c/w rfa.crob no.101 of 2008 9. the suit was filed on 28.01.1995, before the commencement of the act of 39 of 2005, amending section 6 of the hindu succession act, 1956 (for short, the act ).10. sri.vivek mehta learned counsel for the appellants submits the daughter/plaintiff no.1 had no right over the properties in the .....
Tag this Judgment!