Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 3 amendment of section 2 Court: jharkhand Page 15 of about 371 results (0.184 seconds)

Smt. Urmila Agarwala Vs. Lav Kumar Agarwal and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR433(Jhr)]

..... has not been named as executor of the will rather two other persons have been named as executor of the will. further, on reading of section 222 of the indian succession act. 1925, it will appear that probate of the will can be granted only to appointed executor. section 222 is quoted herein below :-1-'222, probate only to appointed ..... , the judgment of the learned court below is hereby set aside and the case is remanded back to the learned court below where applicant will file a petition for amendment of the petition is ay discussed aboveand the learned court below will allow the petition and will also allow opportunity to the par-tics to lead evidence, if necessary ..... . in this very case, a petition for grant of probate was filed but with the death of the applicant, a substitution petition as well as a petition for amendment of the application from grant of probate to grant of letters of administration was filed. the learned court below rejected the prayer and when he went to the high court .....

Makhan Lal HarnaraIn and ors. Vs. Karamchand Thaper and Bros. Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2004Jhar143; [2004(4)JCR626(Jhr)]

..... such subsequent suit or the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. explanation viii of section 11 aforesaid has been inserted by virtue of the amendment by amending act 1976 w.e.f. 1-2-1977 and it provides that the decision of a court of limited jurisdiction on an issue within the competence of such ..... and ext. 2 are referred to in respect thereof. defendant no. 1 m/s. karamchand thapar and brothers (p) limited is a company duly incorporated under the indian companies act and its registered office is at calcutta and its central office is at bhowra, jharia in the district of dhanbad. defendant no. 1 was the managing agent/secretaries ..... the record the following facts are admitted facts :--plaintiff no. 1 m/s. makhan lal har narayan @ hari narayan is a partnership firm registered under the indian partnership act and it carried the business as bankers, general merchants and commission agents having its office at jharia in the district of dhanbad and it also stands registered under .....

TIn Plate Company of India Limited Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004]135STC385(Jharkh)

..... refund of the amount of the tax to the dealer-company.2. the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a company incorporated under the indian companies act having its factory at golmuri, jamshedpur and initially it was manufacturing electrolytic tin plate (etp) having its installed capacity of 90,000 mt and its sole ..... case of diversification/expansion/modernisation, this exemption in sales tax will only be available which besides the incremental production the original production would also continue.' there has been amendment of statutory notification no. 478 dated december 22, 1995 by s.o. no. 57 dated 2nd march, 2000 with retrospective effect of the date of the industrial ..... of diversification. viewed thus, the principle of incremental production has no application in the case of diversification of the unit. this interpretation stands fortified due to the amendment of s.o. no. 478 by s.o. no. 57 dated 2nd march, 2000 referred to above which is to the effect that 'and this facility .....

Bharat Caterers Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2343; [2007(115)FLR827]; [2007(4)JCR344(Jhr)]

..... 08,847/-, which is the contribution of the employees of the petitioner, and is assessable under section 45 of the employees state insurance act (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the act'). the petitioner, by way of amendment, has further prayed for quashing the order dated 2nd/7th february, 2007 (annexure-14), whereby a sum of rs. 6,08,847 ..... learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 to 4, does not dispute the said contention of the petitioner. in view thereof and also to prevent multiplicity of cases, the amendment, as prayed for, is allowed.accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed.w.p.( c ) no. 351 of 20074. in this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for ..... /- has been determined and the order has been issued to recover the said amount under section 45a of the act.5. the ground of the .....

Balku Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1426; [2008(2)JCR193(Jhr)]

..... fees, which included the same seven persons, who had earlier resigned showing their inability to continue with the contract. the same was also challenged by way of amendment, impleading the said members of the group as respondents. the petitioners claimed that the denial of extension of their period and ignoring their claim for settlement as ..... learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondents. learned counsel submitted that there is no such right given in any provision of the bihar agricultural produce market act or rules. rule 82(v) and rule 129(vi) of jharkhand agricultural produce market rules provide for appointment of agent by the market committee to collect market ..... since the policy decision for extension of the period of settlement has been taken up by the marketing board in view of the provisions of the agricultural marketing act and rules, the decision in vijay sen singh's case (supra) has got no application to the facts of the instant case.31. in view of the .....

Yogendra Kumar Ojha, Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR955

..... shall not be less than five years, but which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine.this provision was introduced in the statute by an amendment with effect from 27.5.1988. the term 'possession' as used in the section is not confined only to actual physical possession, but also includes constructive possession. the ..... co-convict surendra singh @ surendra singh bangali were charged with and put on trial for offences under section 25(1a) and section 35 of the arms act and section 414 of the indian penal code. the case against the appellants was registered on 24.6.1997 at 5.00 p.m. on the basis of a written report lodged by ..... the evidence of the prosecution could at best give a reason to support culpability of the appellants yogendra ojha and anil kumar ojha to attract the offence under section 201 ipc against them for harbouring/screening a notorious criminal surendra singh @ surendra singh bangali and for enabling him to use their premises, but even such offence is not made .....

Malti Devi and ors. Vs. Sri Umesh Rawani and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2008ACJ2184; 2007(2)BLJR2919; [2007(4)JCR1113(Jhr)]

..... concerned or any other person.(3) the central government may, keeping in view the cost of living by notification in the official gazette, from time to time amend the second schedule.4. from bare reading of the aforesaid provision, it is manifestly clear that owner or the insurer shall be liable to pay compensation in case ..... section (3) of section 163a provides that central government keeping in view the cost of living shall time to time amend the schedule by issuing notification in the official gazette. second schedule of the motor vehicles act lays down quantum of compensation payable in case of death or permanent disablement by taking into consideration the age of the ..... of the vehicle. inspite of that the tribunal has taken notional income of rs. 15,000/- which is totally against the law and the provisions of the act and the schedule referred to hereinabove.6. besides the above, deceased died leaving behind parents, widow and minor children and it has not been disputed that deceased .....

Charka Lohra Vs. Jitya Lohra and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR351(Jhr)]

..... to clear the impediment by seeking a declaration regarding the compromise decree passed in partition suit no. 314 of 1945. in the circumstances of the case, the amendment, if allowed, would serve the interest of justice and would prevent multiplicity of the legal proceedings. the court below, thus, failed to exercise his jurisdiction properly ..... into consideration the said aspect, has erroneously rejected the petitioner's application for amendment on the ground that if the same is allowed, it would change the nature ..... and 42 was obtained by fraud and collusion. unless the plaintiff is allowed to amend the plaint and to add those statements in the pleadings, he will not be able to take advantage of the provision of section 44 of the evidence act and the purpose of the suit will also frustrate. learned court below, without taking .....

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office and anr. Vs. Dr. Thakur Sur ...

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

..... information report was also registered on 10.12.2002 against the driver of the truck. after investigation the police submitted charge sheet under sections 279 and 338 of the indian penal code against the driver brijnandan prasad mehta.3. the claim set up by the injured was that he was posted as a doctor at r.m.c.h., ..... appeal is that the tribunal has wrongly awarded an exorbitant amount towards loss of future earning capacity. the amount should have been awarded in accordance with the schedule of the act and, therefore, on the basis of principles laid down in various decisions amount of rs. 14,63,207/- is excessive and very high.7. the contention raised by ..... same is accordingly dismissed. the insurance company is liable to disburse the amount forthwith after deduction of the amount already deposited under section 140 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 or any other deposits made pursuant to any other order.14. accordingly, for the reasons stated herein above, the present appeal stands dismissed.

Tata Steel Limited and Others Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Others

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2012AIR(Jhar)83

..... /930/fd in exercise of the powers conferred by the clause (xxia) of section 2 read with section 11 of the jharkhand value added tax act, 2005 (jharkhand act 5 of 2006) as amended by (act 3 of 2008) which prescribes for levy and collection of tax on import price(s) on entry of goods mentioned in third schedule of the ..... compensatory in character and is for augmentation of state revenue and admitted position is that no sanction of the president has been obtained and therefore, the impugned act along with its amendment being not compensatory in character is not saved by article 304(b) of the constitution of india. it is also submitted that if the tax is held ..... for the petitioners submitted that even after, when the division bench of this court already declared, section 11 of the jharkhand value added tax act, 2005 and the amendment made therein by the act of 2007 ultra vires and unconstitutional as being opposed to article 301 of the constitution of india and are not saved by article 304 of the .....