Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : May-27-2014
..... have been taken note of in kusum ingots and alloys ltd.12 would clearly go to show how the situs doctrine had been given a go-by by making constitutional amendments. at one point of time writ petitions against the union of india were being filed only before the punjab and haryana high court as the said court exercised territorial ..... chief of the army / air /naval staff of govt. of india in the matter of conviction, not being the subject of evaluation in oa under section 15 of the act, would not confer jurisdiction or give rise to any cause of action and as a logical corollary to that the order rejecting the statutory complaint, by itself, would not ..... . in view of the objection raised by the registry, heard on the question of territorial jurisdiction. 2. this is an oa, under section 14 of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 seeking the following reliefs:- 1) declaration to the effect that the acrs in question are technically invalid, 2) quashment of the result of no 3 selection board qua .....
Tag this Judgment!