Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1999MP91; 1998(2)MPLJ478
ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel representing the contesting respondents.2. Perused the record.3. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 30-6-1980, passed by the Board of Revenue, the respondent No. 2, whereunder restoring the order passed by the Collector, -- Vidisha dated 11-9-1984, directing for the reversion of the agricultural holdings in dispute in favour of the original tenure-holder, and requiring for recording his name as bhumiswami in the revenue records, and for his being put in possession thereof, the petitioner has now approached this Court seeking redress praying for the reversal of the impugned order.4. The facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this case He in a narrow compass. Sukka, son of Nanna, was the recorded bhumiswami of the agricultural holdings in dispute. He was a member of the tribe which has been declared to be an aboriginal tribe as envisaged under the provisions...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
[1]. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Arbitration Appeal No.3/2008 1. ANSALDO Energia, S.P.A., A Company duly organized and existing under the Laws of Italy with its Principal Office located in via N. Lorenzi, 8, 16152, Geneva, Italy.2. Asia Power Projects Private Limited, (Formerly known as ANSALDO Services Private Limited), having its Registered Office at No.50/1, Residence Road, Third Floor, Gupta Tower, Bangalor025. ..........APPELLANTS Versus 1. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board, Through its Secretary, Shakti Bhawan, Nayagaon, Jabalpur (M.P.) 2. M.P. Power General Co. Ltd., Through its Managing Director, Shakti Bhawan, Nayagaon, Jabalpur (M.P.) ..........RESPONDENTS Present: Hon. Shri Justice Krishn Kumar Lahoti, Acting C.J.Hon. Smt. Justice Vimla Jain ___________________________________________________________________ Shri S.U. Kamdar, learned Senior Advocate with Shri Nahoush Shah, Shri Manot Sharma and Shri Alok Hoonka, Advocates for the appellants. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Review Petition No.986/2012 01.03.2013 Mr. Satish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.B. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on I.A. No.14613/2012, an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons assigned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I find that sufficient reason has been shown for condoning the delay in filing the review petition is made out. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. I.A. No.14613/2012 is allowed. Heard. This petition has been filed for review of the judgment dated 09.10.2012 passed by this Court in Second Appeal No.287/1996. This Court vide judgment dated 09.10.2012 had dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner on the ground that the plea with regard to validity of quit notice was neither raised before the Trial Court not before the Lower Appellate Court. Since the plea of validity of quit notice is mixed question of law and fact, it cannot be allowed to be raised for the first time in app...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.11811/2008 (s) Ku. Jayshree Nandeshwar Vs. The State of M.P. & another Present: Honble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.& Hon'ble Mrs. Vimla Jain, J.______________________________________________________ Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Nirmala Nayak, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1. Shri V. S. Shroti, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Ashish Shroti, for respondent No.2. __________________________________________________ ORDER (...82013) Per : Shri Rajendra Menon, J.Petitioner who was a Judicial Officer has filed this writ petition challenging the orders Annexures P/1 and P/ 2 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority respectively removing her from service.2. The Disciplinary Authority vide Annexure P/1 dated 22.1.2008 imposed the punishment of dismissal from service after conducting a departmental enquiry into certain 2 allegations of misconduct committed by the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.9860/2012(S) Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Mandal Abhiyanta Sangh & otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.11083/2012(S) Devendra Kumar Tiwari -Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.12298/2012(S) Arvind Kumar Upadhyay and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.12302/2012(S) J.P.Soni and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.And. WRIT PETITION NO.22145/2012(S) Deepak Kumar Shrivastava and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi. 2 Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3. Shri B.L.Nag, learned counsel for the interveners......[in W.P.No.9860/2012(S)].Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respond...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2012CrLJ1747
1. Since common questions of facts and law are involved in these similar matters, with the consent of parties the matters were analogously heard and decided by this common judgment. 2. The facts are taken from Misc.Cri.Case No.213/2012. “On 14.3.2011 a tractor trolley of the petitioner was seized by forest officials under the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as the '1927 Act'). As per the story of prosecution, the forest officials were petrolling in the Chambal Sanctuary to check illegal mining of surface soil, sand. During the said petrolling, petitioner's tractor trolley was found laden with sand, surface soil, a forest produce in the prohibited area. Accordingly, the vehicle was seized and a forest criminal case was registered against the petitioner under 1927 Act. The 'forest produce' is defined in Section 4 of the 1927 Act. It is not in dispute between the parties that forest officials sent an intimation of aforesaid seizure to the Magistrate as...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR Election Petition No.20/2009 Ramlal Kol, son of Ramsharan Kol, aged about 36 years, resident of village Hirwara, Tahsil Mudwara, Distt. Katni ...Petitioner Versus Moti Kashyap @ Motilal, son of Late Mewalal, resident of 1220, Durga Chowk, Phootatal, Ravindra Ward, P.O. Gurundi Bazar, Jabalpur ...Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Arvind Shrivastava, Advocate for petitioner. Shri G.S. Baghel, Advocate for respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date of Hearing :10. 1.2013 Date of Judgment :10. 4.2013 JUDGMENT In this petition, election of the returned candidate viz. the respondent to Badwara Legislative Assembly Constituency No.91 has been called in question on the grounds mentioned in clause (a) and sub-clause (i) of clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 100 of Representation...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Writ Petition No.9002/2010 (s) and Writ Petition No.860/2012 (s) MOIL Jan Shakti Majdoor Sangh vs. Union of India -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Counsel for petitioner: Shri Rajendra Tiwari, Shri S. K. Rao, Sr. Adv.with Shri V. K. Pandey. Adv. Respondents No.1-3: Shri Vikram Singh, Adv. Respondent No. 4: Smt. Indira Nair, Sr. Adv. With Shri Rajas Pohankar Adv. Respondent No.5: Shri S. D. Thakur, Adv. and Shri K. C. Ghildiyal, Adv. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (19.06.2012) Sustained industrial growth is possible in a country with an optimum utilization of input. Labour, skilled on/and unskilled is an important nay an inevitable input without which no industry can function. And for better and maximum or the optimum utilization o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1. On a reference by the learned Single Judge, Hon'ble the Chief Justice has constituted this Full Bench to answer the following reference: “(i) Whether the decision of the Division Bench in W.A.No.725/2007(Smt. Rahisha Begum v. State of M.P. & Others) is not a good law in view of the decision of the earlier Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 18-7-2005, passed in W.P.No.1273/2000 (State of M.P. and Others v. Ram Singh and another) (ii) Whether an employee is eligible for the benefit of family pension in accordance with the provisions of Madhya Pradesh (Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, 1979 after completing qualifying service in accordance with the provisions of Recruitment Rules framed by the concerned Department for work charged and contingency paid employees or in accordance with the definition of Rule 2 of Madhya Pradesh (Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, 1979 in regard to “contingency paid e...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
F.A. No.112/1991 1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR Single Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA First Appeal No.112/1991 (Date of filing of Civil Suit :11. 03.1976) APPELLANTS:1. State of Madhya Pradesh through Defendant No.4 the Collector, Hoshangabad. Defendant No.1 2. Competent Authority, M.P. Ceiling Agricultural Holdings Act, Harda. Versus RESPONDENTS 1 Mohan Sugar Mills Limited Plaintiff No.1 Registered Office, Harda. Plaintiff No.2 2. The Central Trading Company Private Ltd., Registered Office, Harda. Defendant No.2 3. Seth Vallabh Das Modi (since deceased) not by LRs:- (i) Smt. Pushpa Devi wd/o Seth Vallabh Das Modi, (ii) Krishna Das s/o Seth Vallabh Das Modi (iii) Brijesh Das s/o Seth Vallabh Das Modi All R/o 145, Garhi Pura, Harda (iv) Smt. Chandawali w/o Ramnarayan, R/o Somani Mohalla, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan (v) Yamuna Devi w/o Mahesh Kumar Dalni, R/o Agrawal Colony, 499, Jabalpur. (vi) Smt. Mridula Vyas w/o Narendra Kumar Vyas, R/o 860, Mahaveer Nagar, II Kota...
Tag this Judgment!