Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 27a Sorted by: recent Page 61 of about 852 results (0.208 seconds)

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Anil Khirwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines and ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... denial of extension is in spirit, passing the order of rejection of renewal application which is nothing but an attempt to circumvent the provisions of the amendment act, 2015. if even after amendment act, 2015, its object is not given effect to, it would amount to disregard the intention of the 8 legislature. in effect, the state government ..... india and others [(2003) 7 scc628, para-25 and 27 thereof] ii.jagmittar sain bhagat and others versus director, health services, haryana and others [(2013) 10 scc136 iii.indian performing rights society limited versus sanjay dalia and another [(2015) 10 scc161 iv. k.b. nagur, m.d. (ayu.) versus union of india [air2012sc1774also see (2012) ..... judgments rendered by the apex court in the case of state of tamil nadu vs. hind stone & others reported in [(1981) 2 scc205 union of india & others vs. indian charge chrome & another [(1999) 7 scc314, chairman cum managing director, coal india ltd. & others vs. ananta saha & others [(2011) 5 scc142 and in the case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2016 (SC)

Kedar Nath Yadav Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... be made after the expiry of three years from the date of the publication of the notification; or published after the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984, shall be made after the expiry of one year from the date of the publication of the notification:]. [provided further that]. no such ..... . but here, so far from holding them to be wrong, the whole of the learned judges, who are thoroughly conversant with the conditions of indian life, say that they are satisfied that the scheme is one which will redound to public benefit by helping the government to maintain the efficiency of ..... |3 |power |100 mva |quality of power (50 hz +/- 3%), | | |(including | |availability from 2 sources, regulatory | | |vendor park) | |voltage +/- 5% | |4 |water |15000 cu.m |potable water as per indian standards | | |(including | |(is-10500) | | |vendor park) | | | |5 |6 lane road | |approach road to be available within 3 | | |around the | |months from the date of land allotment. | | |boundary .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2016 (HC)

U. Vijaya Kumar and Another Vs. Malini V. Rao

Court : Karnataka

..... to the plaintiff. the plaintiff thus has every right to repudiate the transaction and such a statutory right is conferred upon the principal under section 215 of the indian contract act. the trial court, after appreciating the legal evidence on record, has come to the right conclusion and we do not find any reasons to interfere with the same ..... the properties sold then a suit without such a prayer was of no avail to the plaintiffs. in all probability realizing this difficulty the plaintiffs filed the application for amendment of the plaint seeking to introduce the prayer for setting aside the sale deeds. unfortunately, the realization came too late. concededly, plaintiff no.2 digamber attained majority on ..... the plaint could not come to the rescue of the plaintiff." this was a case where additional reliefs were claimed by way of amendment to the prayer column beyond the time prescribed for claiming such relief and therefore the suit came to be dismissed. as such, the ratio laid down in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2016 (HC)

Sri U Vijaya Kumar Vs. Smt Malini v Rao

Court : Karnataka

..... to the plaintiff. the plaintiff thus has every right to repudiate the transaction and such a statutory right is conferred upon the principal under section 215 of the indian contract act. the trial court, after appreciating the legal evidence on record, has come to the right conclusion and we do not find any reasons to interfere with the same ..... the properties sold then a suit without such a prayer was of no avail to the plaintiffs. in all probability realizing this difficulty the plaintiffs filed the application for amendment of the plaint seeking to introduce the prayer for setting aside the sale deeds. unfortunately, the realization came too late. concededly, plaintiff no.2 digamber attained majority on ..... the plaint could not come to the rescue of the plaintiff. 26 this was a case where additional reliefs were claimed by way of amendment to the prayer column beyond the time prescribed for claiming such relief and therefore the suit came to be dismissed. as such, the ratio laid down in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2016 (HC)

Padam Kumar Jain Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... the required conditions of the lease as for instance, the postulated clearance/approvals /consent in terms of sub-section (5) or (6) of section 8a of the amendment act, 2015. as is also apparent from the pleadings in the present case and undisputed by the parties, the lessee has not obtained the statutory clearances like environmental clearance ..... are relating to the jurisdiction of the state government now to pass an order of rejection of his renewal application after 7. coming into force of the mmdr (amendment) act, 2015 with effect from 12.01.2015. the intricate questions of law involved cannot be properly adjudicated by the revisional authority. it is also pointed out that ..... mineral exploration was never made in the show-cause notice. however, exploration has been done and it forms part of the mining scheme which was approved by the indian bureau of mines. counsel for the petitioner contends that in view of the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of common cause vs. union of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2016 (SC)

Modern Dental College and Res.Cen. and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Prades ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the executive power of the union.6. while education is a concurrent subject under entry 25 of concurrent list as substituted by constitution (forty-second amendment) act 1976, entries 65 and 66 of union list give union the power to ensure that the standards of research etc. is not lowered at the hands ..... should strike a reasonable balance between the several relevant considerations. likewise, after the insertion of clause (5) to article 15 by the constitution (ninety-third amendment) act, 2005, another enabling provision was introduced empowering the state to make any special provision by law for advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens ..... is why the committee is convinced that the mci cannot be remedied according to the existing provisions of the indian medical council act, 1956 which is certainly outdated. if we try to amend or modify the existing act, ten years down the line we will still be grappling with the same problems that we are facing today .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2016 (SC)

State of Kerala and Ors. Vs. M/S Kerala Rare Earth and Minerals Limite ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of area by central government or by the state government for the purpose of conservation of minerals . by amendment act 37 of 1986 (w.e.f. 10.02.1987), section 17a was inserted in the act. section 17a reads as under:- 17a. reservation of area for purposes of conservation.- (1) the central government ..... minerals classified as prescribed substances is reserved for the public sector. however, the policy resolution also allows selective entry of the private sector. at present, the indian rare earths limited (irel), a government of india (department of atomic energy) undertaking and kerala minerals & metals ltd. (kmml), a government of kerala undertaking ..... wealth cannot be allowed to be exploited by indiscriminate mining by private players. it was further contended that the first respondent is a private party where indian rare earths ltd. (government of india) and kerala state industrial development corporation (government of kerala) have minimal percentage of share holdings and no right .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2016 (HC)

The Secretary, The Karnataka Government, Bangalore Vs. Susheelamma, Si ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of padma sundara rao (dead) and ors. v. state of t.n. and ors. 12. even in the land acquisition act of 1894, the legislature had brought about amendment in section 6 through an amendment act of 1984 to add explanation 1 for the purpose of excluding the period when the proceeding suffered stay by an order of the ..... ). ltd. (state of andhra pradesh vs. t. suryachandra rao, k.d. sharma vs. sail and central bank of india vs. madhulika guruprasad dahir. 34. an act of fraud on court is always viewed seriously. a collusion or conspiracy with ..... proceedings of courts of justice. fraud is an act of deliberate deception with a design to secure something, which is otherwise not due. the expression "fraud" involves two elements, deceit and injury to the person deceived. it is a cheating intended to get an advantage. (vide vimla (dr.) vs. delhi administration, indian bank vs. satyam fibres (india) (p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

South Indian Music Companies Vs. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

..... . in subramanian swamy case, ((2014) 8 scc 682)), the dispute revolved around the constitutionality of section 6a of the delhi special police establishment act 1946, which was introduced by an amendment in the year 2003. it stipulated that the delhi special police establishment shall not conduct any enquiry or investigation into any offence falling under the ..... of article 14, the petitioners relied upon the judgments of this court reported in subramanian swamy v. director, central bureau of investigation and another, ((2014) 8 scc 682), indian council of legal aid and advice v. bar council of india, ((1995) 1 scc 732), b. prabhakar rao and others v. state of andhra pradesh and others, ..... the code of criminal procedure and its proceedings before the board shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the indian penal code. 9. an appeal would lie to the board against the registrar of companies under section 72(1). section 72(2) prescribes an appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

..... first such set of provisions came into force on 31st march, 2003. the competition act has been subsequently amended by the competition (amendment) act, 2007 and the competition (amendment) act, 2009. 114. the preamble of the competition act reads as under:- "an act to provide, keeping in view of the economic development of the country, for the ..... are promptly enabled to be revoked.". in addition, he further pointed out various types of abuse of patent rights and pointed out that indian patents and designs act, 1911 did not contain provisions for countering various such misuses. a bill based on the recommendations made by justice ayyangar was moved in ..... the law from curbing monopolies to promoting competition. the committee was requested "to suggest a modern competition law in line with international developments to suit indian conditions". the terms of reference required the committee to recommend as under:- "(a) a suitable legislative framework, in the light of international economic .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //