Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.889 of 2007 Arup Bhuyan .. Appellant Versus State of Assam & Anr. .. Respondents With Review Petition (Criminal) No.417/2011 In Criminal Appeal No.1383/2007 With Review Petition (Criminal) No.426/2011 In Criminal Appeal No.889/2007 With Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.5971/2019 With Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.5964/2019 With Criminal Appeal No.1383/2007 2 With SLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.16637/2014 With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5643/2019 With Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6270/2019 JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Present reference to the larger Bench is made against the judgment and order in the case of Arup Bhuyan vs. Union of India, (2011) 3 SCC377as well as State of Kerala vs. Raneef, (2011) 1 SCC784 pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 26.08.2014, reported as (2015) 12 SCC702 Background of the Reference 2. That the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Raneef (supra) wh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11095 OF2018GMR WARORA ENERGY LIMITED ...APPELLANT (S) VERSUS CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (CERC) & ORS. ...RESPONDENT (S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.11910-11911 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL NOS.12055-12056 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL NO.3123 OF2019CIVIL APPEAL NO.5372 OF2019CIVIL APPEAL No.6641 OF2019CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2935-2936 OF2020CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4628-4629 OF2021CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5583-5584 OF2021CIVIL APPEAL No.39 OF2021CIVIL APPEAL No.5005 OF2022CIVIL APPEAL No.4089 OF20221 Index I. INTRODUCTION.. Paras 1 to 5 II. BRIEF FACTS AND SUBMISSIONS.. Paras 6 to 91 III. ADDITIONAL ISSUES Para 92 IV. CONSIDERATION Paras 93 to 130 V. CONCLUSION Paras 131 to 168 VI. EPILOGUE.. Paras 169 to 184 List of abbreviations:1. APTEL - Appellate Tribunal for Electricity 2. CEA - Central Electricity Authority 3. CERC - Central Electricity Regulatory Commission 4. CIL - Coal India Limited 5. COD - Commercial Operation Date 6. C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2963 OF2023[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.14970 of 2021]. Bishambhar Prasad Appellant Versus M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. & Respondents Ors. WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.2965 OF2023[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13106 of 2021]. The Rajasthan Industrial Development Appellant and Investment Corporation Ltd. Versus M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. & Respondents Ors. WITH C.A. No.of 2023 @ SLP (C)No.14970 OF2021ETC.ETC. Page 1 of 113 CIVIL APPEAL No.2964 OF2023[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13008 of 2021]. The State of Rajasthan & Anr. Appellant Versus M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. & Respondents Ors. WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2966 OF2023[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.960 of 2022]. The President, J.K. Staple & Acrylic Appellant Employees Union & Ors. Versus M/s Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. & Respondents Ors. AND CIVIL APP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF JULY, 2023 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.PRASANNA B.VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT APPEAL NO.1169 OF2022(GM-TEN) BETWEEN: MACAWBER BEEKAY PVT LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BEEKAY HOUSE, C450-451 SECTOR10 NOIDA GUATAM BUDHA NAGAR UTTAR PRADESH 201 301 REPD. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (CONTRACTS). ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. DAMA SHESHADRI NAIDU, SR. ADVOCATE A/W MR. SANDEEP GROVER, MR. ADITYA NAYYAR MR. TARANG AGARWAL, MR. ABHISHEK ARORA & MR. PARASHURAM A.L., ADVOCATES) AND:1. . BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT:2. BHEL HOUSE, SIRI FORT NEW DELHI 110 049 REPD. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 . BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD., INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS GROUP HAVING OFFICE AT: OPPOSITE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE PROF. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2023INSC917IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11128 OF2016C.I.T., DELHI ....APPELLANT(S) VS. BHARTI HEXACOM LTD. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4902/2022 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 162/2018 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 159/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4839/2017 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 153/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 6897/2018 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S)._ _______of 2023 (@ SLP (C)_________OF2023(@DIARY NO(S). 4178/2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). ________of 2023 (@ SLP(C) No.24740/2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). ________of 2023 (@ SLP(C) No.20863/2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 158/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 302/2021 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 303/2021 1 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11149/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11148/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11130/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11131/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11134/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11132/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11136/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11133/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11135/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11137/2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11140/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2023INSC976IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION No.43 OF2022LOMBARDI ENGINEERING LIMITED PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UTTARAKHAND JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.:1. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act 1996) filed at the instance of a company based in Switzerland and engaged in the business of design consultancy seeking appointment of an arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes and claims emanating from the Contract dated 25.10.2019 entered into between the petitioner and respondent i.e., Uttarakhand Vidyut Nigam Limited (a wholly owned corporation of the Government of Uttarakhand). 1 FACTUAL MATRIX2 The petitioner is a design consultancy firm based in Switzerland, having its registered office at Via Del Tiglio 2, PO Box 934, CH934 CH6512 Bellinzona-Guibiasco, Switzerland and local Indian address at B3/61, 1st Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, D...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2023 INSC1058IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL WRIT / APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1099 of 2019 IN RE: ARTICLE370OF THE CONSTITUTION With Writ Petition (C) No.871 of 2015 With Writ Petition (C) No.722 of 2014 With SLP (C) No.19618 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.1013 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1082 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1068 of 2019 1 With Writ Petition (C) No.1037 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1062 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1070 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1104 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1165 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1210 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1222 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.396 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.756 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.398 pf 2018 With 2 Writ Petition (C) No.924 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1092 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1162 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1048 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1268 of 2019 And With Writ Petition (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2023 INSC1066IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT/ CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Curative Petition (C) No.44 of 2023 in Review Petition (C) No.704 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No.1599 of 2020 IN RE: INTERPLAY BETWEEN ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT1996AND THE INDIAN STAMP ACT1899And With Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2023 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI A. Reference .................................................................................................................. 5 B. Submissions ........................................................................................................... 12 C. Maintainability ........................................................................................................ 18 D. The Indian Stamp Act 1899 .................................................................................... 22 i. Overview ...................................................................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2023INSC1071IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.3838 Of 2023 (Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.11129 Of 2023) Afjal Ansari .Appellant(s) versus State of UP .Respondent(s) JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.07.2023, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter, High Court), partially allowing the application filed by the Appellant under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter, CrPC), for the stay on the sentence and conviction, awarded by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, MP/MLA Court, Ghazipur (hereinafter, Trial Court) vide judgement and order dated 29.04.2023. The High Court, has through the impugned order, Page 1 of 19 suspended the Appellants sentence and granted him bail but the stay on conviction has been declined. FACTS:3. At this juncture, it is imperative to delve into the factual matrix to set out ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2024 INSC3IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL/CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No.162 of 2023 Vishal Tiwari Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents With Writ Petition (Crl) No.39 of 2023 With Writ Petition (C) No.201 of 2023 And with Writ Petition (Crl) No.57 of 2023 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Factual background and submissions ....................................................... 3 B. The scope of judicial review over SEBIs regulatory domain ................. 11 C. There is no apparent regulatory failure attributable to SEBI .................. 17 D. The plea to transfer the investigation from SEBI to another agency or to an SIT .................................................................................................................. 23 i. The power to transfer an investigation is exercised in extraordinary situations ......................................................................................
Tag this Judgment!