Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK F.A.O. No.424 of 2012 From judgment dated 30.06.2012 passed by the Commissioner for Employees Compensation, Ganjam, Berhampur in W.C. Case No.48 of 2011. -------Executive Engineer (Electrical), SOUTHCO, At/P.O./P.S. Phulbani, Dist: Kandhamal and others Appellants Respondents -VersusSmt. R. Wara Laxmi and others For Appellants : M/s. P. Mohanty, D.N. Mohapatra, J.Mohanty, P.K. Nayak & S.N. Dash For Respondents : M/s. B.N. Samantaray, N. Ch. Tripathy, R.K. Parichha, D. Pattnaik & P. Jena [For Respondent Nos.1 to 4]. ---------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment :23. 08.2013 B.N. Mahapatra, J.This appeal has been directed by the appellants under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 challenging correctness of the judgment dated 30.06.2012 passed by the Commissioner for Employees Compensation, Ganjam, Berhampur (for short, Commissioner.) in W.C. Case No.48 of 2011.2. The case of the claimant-respondents bef...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.14123 OF 201.In the matter of application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ----------Braja Sundar Nanda Petitioner -VersusPravabati Kar and others. For Petitioner : For opp. parties: ... Opp. Parties. M/s. Goutam Mukherji, P.Mukherji, A.C. Panda, S.D. Ray and S.Mishra. . Mr. B.H.Mohanty, Sr. Advocate. ----------------------Decided on 14.08.2013 -------------------------------PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.M. DAS M. M. DAS, J.This writ petition has been filed by the defendant No.1 in C.S. No.654 of 2011-I pending before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), First Court, Cuttack against the order passed by the said court on 27.7.2012.2. The opp. party No.1 filed the aforementioned suit seeking a decree for specific performance of contract directing the defendants 1 to 7 to execute and register a sale deed in her favour in respect of the suit land described in Schedule-A, as delineated Schedule C, of the in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK In the matter of applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. --------W.P.(C) NO.13683 OF 201.Orissa Private Engineering College Association (OPECA), Room No.114, Gallery No.3, AT: Barabati Stadium, Cuttack-5, Represented through its Honorary Secretary, Sri BiNo.Dash and others W.P.(C) No.14306 of 2013 Silicon Institute of Technology, AT: Silicon Hills, Patia, PO/PS: Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar Represented by its Managing Trustee, Ramananda Mishra For Petitioners : .... Petitioners Mr.S.K.Padhi, Sr. Advocate M/s. Devi Prasad Dash, B.K.Mishra, & S.K.Barik (In W.P.(C) NO.13683 OF 2013.: M/s Soubhagya S.Das, S.Das, R.Sahoo & J.K.Swain (In W.P.(C) No.14306 of 2013) -VersusState of Odisha and others For Opp. Parties : Opp. Parties Mr.A.K.Mishra, Addl. Govt. Advocate Mr.J.K.Mishra, Sr. Advocate M/s P.C.Behera & S.S.Mohanty (For OP-AICTE) M/s Subir Palit, A.K.Mahana, A.Mishra, A.Kejariwal, R.Tripathy & A.Parija (For OP-OJEE) Mr.A.K.Mohapa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK In the matter of applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. --------W.P.(C) NO.13683 OF 201.Orissa Private Engineering College Association (OPECA), Room No.114, Gallery No.3, AT: Barabati Stadium, Cuttack-5, Represented through its Honorary Secretary, Sri BiNo.Dash and others W.P.(C) No.14306 of 2013 Silicon Institute of Technology, AT: Silicon Hills, Patia, PO/PS: Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar Represented by its Managing Trustee, Ramananda Mishra For Petitioners : .... Petitioners Mr.S.K.Padhi, Sr. Advocate M/s. Devi Prasad Dash, B.K.Mishra, & S.K.Barik (In W.P.(C) NO.13683 OF 2013.: M/s Soubhagya S.Das, S.Das, R.Sahoo & J.K.Swain (In W.P.(C) No.14306 of 2013) -VersusState of Odisha and others For Opp. Parties : Opp. Parties Mr.A.K.Mishra, Addl. Govt. Advocate Mr.J.K.Mishra, Sr. Advocate M/s P.C.Behera & S.S.Mohanty (For OP-AICTE) M/s Subir Palit, A.K.Mahana, A.Mishra, A.Kejariwal, R.Tripathy & A.Parija (For OP-OJEE) Mr.A.K.Mohapa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK In the matter of applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------Ajit Kumar Routray Pravash Ku. Sahoo BiNo.Ku. Sahoo Braja Kishore Sahoo Nrusingha Ch. Routray Pravash Kumar Sahoo Ajit Kumar Routray Avijit Panda W.P.(C) No.8084 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.8082 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.9531 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.9533 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.9549 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.7110 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.7111 of 2013 M/s Ramakanta Mohanty, D.Mohanty, S.Mohanty, D.Varadwaj, A.Mohanty, S.Mohanty, P. Jena & A.K.Das W.P.(C) No.9378 of 2013 M/s Gopal. Kr. Mohanty, P.K.Panda, D.Mishra & N.K.Khan Pradeepta Kumar Nath Yogesh Sahu & Ors. MaNo.Ku. Sahoo Bimala Dalabehera Aruna K. Sahoo and Another W.P.(C) No.8912 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.9558 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.10085 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.10731 of 2013 W.P.(C) No.8911 of 2013 M/s Narasingh Patra, A.K.Patra & B.Shadangi Gitanjali Sahoo Bipin Bihari Nayak W.P.(C)No.6351 of 2013 W.P.(C)No.10690 of 2013 M/s Kali Pr. Mishra, S.Mohapatra, T.P....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK R.F.A. No.333 OF 200.From a judgment and decree dated 12.07.2007 and 25.07.2007 respectively passed by Shri P.C. Patra, learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nayagarh in Money Suit No.97 of 1993 III. -----------State of Orissa & others Appellants -versusSabitamayee Singh & others For Appellants : Respondents Advocate General and Addl. Standing Counsel. For Respondents : M/s. Milan Kanungo, D.Pradhan, Y.Mohanty, S.K.Mishra, A.Pattanaik, B. Pattanaik, S.N. Das, S.Nanda & B.B.Panda. -----------------Decided on 24.07.2013 ------------------PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. M. DAS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------M.M. DAS, J.This appeal has been filed by the State of Orissa and others assailing the judgment dated 12.7.2007 and decree dated 25.7.2007 respectively passed in Money Suit No.97 of 1993-III by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nayagarh dismissing the said suit filed by the appellants ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. W.P.(C). No.26106 OF 201.In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ----------Gagan Jena and others Petitioners -VersusRama Chandra Parida and others For Petitioners Opp. parties : M/s. S.P.Mishra, Sr. Advocate, S.K.Mohanty, A.P. Mishra, S.K. Samantaray, A.K. Dash & J.K. Mahapatra. For opp. parties : M/s. Mahadev Mishra, Mamata Mishra & G.C. Bhuyan. (for O.P. 4 ) Mr. G.C. Swain (for O.Ps 2,3,4,6,7 and8) ----------------------Decided on 24.07.2013 -------------------------------PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.M. DAS M. M. DAS, J.This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 23.7.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jajpur by which he confirmed the order dated 5.9.2000 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jajpur in rejecting the application filed by the present petitioners under Order 9, Rule 13 C.P.C. to set aside the 2 ex parte decree pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. MATA NOS. 90, 91 AND 9.OF 201.From a common judgment dated 31.10.2011 passed by Shri Arun Kumar Mishra, Judge, Family Court, Jajpur in C. P. Nos. 283, 445 and 446 of 2011. ----------(In all cases) Abinash Samal Appellant -VersusGitipuspa Samal For appellant ... Respondent. : M/s. A.P.Bose, R.K.Mahanta, N. Hota & M.Pradhan. For Respondent: M/s. Dibakar Bhuyan, B.N. Das, A.K.Rout & C.R.Swain. ----------------------Date of judgment 17.05.2013 -------------------------------PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.M. DAS AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.K.MISRA M. M. DAS, J.The aforesaid three appeals have been filed by the appellant-husband against a common judgment dated 31.10.2011 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Jajpur in three Civil Proceeding Nos. 283, 445 and 446 of 2011. The appellant-husband filed C.P. No.283 of 2011 (previously numbered as C.P. No.10 of 2009 in the court of the Judge, Family Court, Cuttack) under section 13 of the Hindu Marr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.7553 of 2010 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -----------Tribal Development Co-operative Corporation of Orissa Ltd. (TDCCOL), represented through its Managing Director, At- Rupali Square, P.S. Sahid Nagar, Bhubaneswar, Dist: Khurda. Petitioner Opp. Parties -VersusRegistrar, Co-operative Tribunal, Orissa, Bhubanewar and another. For Petitioner For Opp. Parties : M/s. Bhagaban Mohanty, D. Chhotrary, B. Moharana & S. Mohanty. : M/s.P.K. Padhi, P.K. Panda, D.K. Nayak, S. Nayak & A. K.Rath (O.P.2) ----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment:30. 04.2013 B.N. Mahapatra, J.This writ petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner-Tribal Development Co-operative Corporation of Orissa Ltd. (for short, TDCCOL), to quash the order dated 15.03.2010 (Annexure-8) passed by opposite party No.1-Member, Co-operative Tribunal, Orissa, Bhubaneswar in Service ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.12891 of 2012 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------Executive Engineer Electrical (NESCO), Baripada Electrical Division, AT/PO: Baripada, Dist: Mayurbhanj & another Petitioners -VersusChairperson, Permanent Lok Adalat (P.U.S.), Mayurbhanj, Baripada and another For Petitioners For Opp. parties : : Opp. parties Mr. S.C. Dash M/s Anjan Kr. Biswal, P.K.Roul & D.R.Das (Caveator) ---------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment:14. 2.2013 B.N. MAHAPATRA, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the award dated 12.06.2012 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat Mayurbhanj, Baripada in P.L.A. Case No.5 of 2012 under Annexure-3 wherein the application filed by opposite party No.2-Suresh Chandra Acharya has been allowed in part on the ground that the impugned order is illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction/authority2. The facts and circumstanc...
Tag this Judgment!