Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 11 amendment of section 11 Sorted by: recent Year: 1998 Page 10 of about 506 results (0.345 seconds)

Reno Vs. American-arab Anti-discrimination Comm.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... who is in exclusion or deportation proceedings" on the effective date of iirira, april 1, 1997. section 309(c)(1)(a) of iirira, 110 stat. 3009-625, as amended by 2 of the act of oct. 11, 1996, 110 stat. 3657. hence, by operation of 306(c)(1), it would appear that aliens who did not obtain judicial review as of the ..... contradictory provisions is put in play by 306(c)(1) of the illegal immigration reform and immigrant responsibility act of 1996 (iirira), 110 stat. 3009-612, as 502 502 reno v. american-arab anti-discrimination comm. souter, j., dissenting amended by 2 of the act of oct. 11, 1996, 110 stat. 3657, which makes new 8 u. s. c. 1252(g) (1994 ed ..... "terrorist activity" provision was added by the immigration act of 1990. see 8 u. s. c. 1227(a)(4)(b) (1994 ed., supp. iii). the ins charged hamide and shehadeh under this, but it is unclear whether that was in addition to, or in substitution for, the old mccarran-walter charges. 3 the amended complaint was styled as an action for "damages .....

Hope Plantations Ltd. Vs. Taluk Land Board, Peermade and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1998(7)SC404; 1999(1)KLT331(SC); RLW1999(2)SC227; 1998(6)SCALE19; (1999)5SCC590; [1998]Supp2SCR514

..... to examine the claim regarding land interspersed with plantation crops. it was on that account the question had been remanded to state land board for determination. but after the act was amended by amending act 27 of 1979 w.e.f. 7.7.1979 taluk land board was also empowered to examine the claim in question. taluk land board, therefore, could rightly go ..... this court in gopal prasad sinha vs . state of bihar : 1971crilj420 . this case arose out of criminal prosecution, the accused was tried on a charge under section 409 ipc for having committing criminal breach of trust for rs. 27,800/-during the period between january 31, 1960 to november 30, 1960, when he was ..... the section.' 6. as to what is 'rested area', reference may be made to (1) tea encyclopedia of the indian tea associates, scientific department (2) tea planting in ceylon by e.c. elliot and f.j. whitehead and (3) indian tea by claud bald. resting of tea is part of tea plantation. certain areas in tea plantation are rested temporarily .....

Mathura Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs. Uppar Shram Ayukta, Agra and Others ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC462; [1999(81)FLR658]

..... award, or under an award given by an adjudicator or the state industrial tribunal appointed or constituted under this act, before the commencement of the uttar pradesh industrial disputes (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act. 1956, the workman may, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, make an application to the state ..... effect, unless it is given by a party representing the majority of persons bound by settlement or award, as the case may be.'6. in south indian bank v. a. r. chacko, air 1964 sc 1522, the question regarding effectiveness of an award after expiry of the period of its operation ..... moment if no reference is permissible to the regulations when considering the validity and operation of the'settlement' contract.accordingly, regulation 58, aproduct of the corporation act,cannot supersede the contractrespecting bonus between theparties respecting from thesettlement of 1974, support isderived for this conclusion fromu. p. state electricity board v.hari shanker jain .....

Vivek SarIn Vs. Multi Metal Udyog

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1999]96CompCas907(P& H); (1999)121PLR620

..... the lis may last and cannot be vacated in between. he has raised some submissions with regard to applicability of the provisions of the contempt of courts act in entertaining the contempt petition and holding the appellant guilty of contempt, but at this stage we are not concerned with the said contention of learned counsel ..... by the learned single judge directing payment of the defaulted amount is without jurisdiction as the learned single judge while exercising his jurisdiction under the contempt of courts act, 1971, could only convict the appellant for contempt but through the said coercive measures could not order payment of the remaining amount. his other contention is ..... undertaking was also given that if apex multitech limited failed to make the payment of even one instalment on any account, the proceedings under the contempt of courts act could be initiated against it. the order of the court depicting the undertaking of the appellant that came to be passed by the court reads thus : ' .....

Hari Kant and Another Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1999CriLJ2458

..... pm. the police after investigation arrested the appellants and charged them for an offence under section 302 read with section 34 as also under section 201 read with section 34 ipc. they were, thus, sent for trial with the result as indicated above. 4. the prosecution in its endeavour to bring home the offence against the appellants examined sham behari first ..... , j. 1. appellants hari kant and kalia who have been held guilty of an offence under section 302 read with section 34 of the indian panel code as also under section 201 read with section 34 of indian penal code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life as also to pay a fine of rs. 5,000/- each and r.i. for .....

Kalyan Chand Goyal Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(Delhi)257; 1998(47)DRJ772

..... and unequivocal denial of that right by respondent. my attention was also drawn to the notification dated 8.1.1997 notifying the indian contract (amendment) act, 1996 amending the provisions of section 28 of the contract act which provides thus:-'every agreement: (a) by which any party thereto is restricted absolutely from enforcing his rights under or in ..... rs.29,500/- on account of prolonged establishment, holding that the petitioners are entitled to damages/compensation under section 53 read with section 73 of the indian contract act. the delay in completion of work was for 16 months. the arbitrator has taken note of the provisions of clauses 10 and 10cc of the agreement ..... the agreement. in this connection my attention was also drawn to the provisions of clause 42 of the agreement. the said clause 42 of the agreement came to be amended in respect of clauses (2) & (3) thereof. unamended clause 42(1) came to be considered in this court in the decision of salwan construction company vs .....

Mrs. Shamim Banu Vs. Mr. R.H. Mendonca and Another

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR146

..... 29th january, 1998 detaining the prisoner by virtue of section 3(1) of the maharashtra prevention of dangerous activities of slumlords, bootleggers, drug offenders and dangerous persons act, 1981 as amended 1996 and r/w government order no. dds-1397/1/ spl-3(b) dated 12th december, 1971 impugned the same for want of regularity and propriety. the ..... a complaint of abbas gulam momin to dharavi police station was registered under c.r. no. 568 of 1997 for the offence under section 387 and 34 of the indian penal code, which was followed by arrest of the detenu on 1-11-1997 and he has admitted his above said complicity. consequently, a knife also was recovered ..... the order of detention by virtue of clause 1 of section 3 of the maharashtra prevention of dangerous activities of slumlords, bootleggers, drug offenders and dangerous persons act as amended up to day, r/w. article 226 of the constitution of india by passing the impugned order which order alongwith the grounds has been served upon the .....

Csr Estates, Flat Owners Welfare Association, Kothapet, Rr Dist. Vs. H ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD547; 1998(6)ALT540

..... also has no power to modify the original declaration along with the plan made or deemed to have been made under sections 4 and 14 of the act, unless it is by way of amended declaration by all the flat owners duly executed and registered. if this is the position of law, the petitioners would not be bound by the ..... case, it is the not the case of the respondents that the original declaration contemplated under section 4 read with section 14 of the act was amended by duly executed and registered, as provided in this act. from this it follows that according to the approved plan whatever space is left for car parking in the stilt floor and whatever the ..... unless there is an amended declaration duly executed and registered by all the flat owners, there cannot be any modification to the existing plan and the building constructed according to it. it is a common principle of law that any contract prohibited by law would be a void contract. in fact section 23 of the indian contract act is to the same .....

Sahi Ram Vs. Avtar Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1999Delhi96; ILR1998Delhi945

..... : air1989delhi227 and various other decisions. in these cases the question involved was regarding the premature termination of the lease under section 4a of the act. it further appears that the act was amended in 1986 and subsection (3) to section 4a was inserted thereby incorporating statutory requirement of grant of a reasonable opportunity of being heard before making ..... judge. there can be various reasons for dismissal of a special leave petition under article 136. the question stands squarely settled by supreme court in the case of indian oil corporation ltd. v. state of bihar, air 1986 sc 1780. reversing the decision of the division bench of the patna high court on the question ..... , these observations have no relevance on the question of exercise of the power by this court under article 226. apart from the decision in the case of indian oil corporation air 1986 sc 1780 (supra), the point in issue also stands concluded by a constitution bench decision of the apex court in the case of .....

Satbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1999CriLJ1780

..... calls in question the orders passed by mr. p. l. goyal, additional sessions judge, sonepat dated 29-11-1996 and 2-12-1996 convicting him under s. 302 of the indian penal code and sentencing him to undergo r.i. for life and to pay a fine of rs. 2,000/- or in default thereof to further undergo r.i. for .....