Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 11 amendment of section 11 Sorted by: recent Court: us supreme court Year: 1998 Page 5 of about 57 results (0.184 seconds)

P.V. Narsimha Rao Vs. State (Cbi/Spe)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2120; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)157; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)762; 1997(1)BLJR263; 1998CriLJ2930; 1998(3)SCALE53; (1998)4SCC626; [1998]2SCR870

..... with clause (12)(a) of section 21 ipc, as amended by the amendment act of 1964, the court observed that a person would be a public ..... ensure speedy trial of cases of bribery, corruption and criminal misconduct and make the law otherwise more effective, which led to the amendments introduced in section 21 ipc by the anti corruption laws (amendment) act, 1964 as well as the statement made by shri hathi, minister- in-charge, while piloting in the lok sabha the ..... bill which was enacted as the anti corruption laws (amendment) act, 1964. the court held that a member of the legislative assembly was not comprehended in the definition of 'public servant' in section 21 ipc and that the amendments introduced in section 21 ipc by the amendment act of 1964 did not bring about any change. while dealing .....

Board of Trustees, Port of Mumbai Vs. Indian Oil Corporation and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)634; AIR1998SC1878; [1998]93CompCas228(SC); JT1998(3)SC178; 1998(2)SCALE714; (1998)4SCC302; [1998]2SCR774

..... may 1985 and was laid up at anchorage. it became liable to pay anchorage and other charges leviable under the provisions of the major port trusts act, 1963 as amended by the major port trust (amendment) act of 1974, and the dock scale of rates framed thereunder by the appellant. in view of the port trust charges which remained unpaid, the appellant ..... -port trust arrested the said vessel in exercise of its rights under section 64 of the major port trust act, 1963. it issued a public notice on 14th of ..... in the case of the emilie million (1905) 2 k.b.817 the court of appeal in england considered a similar provision under section 253 of the mersey dock acts consolidation act, of 1858. it held that the right of the harbour board to cause such vessel to be detained until all such rates have been paid, gives the board .....

Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors. New Delhi Vs. Oberoi Hotels (In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998IVAD(SC)411; AIR1998SC1666; (1998)146CTR(SC)222; [1998]231ITR148(SC); JT1998(2)SC717; 1998(2)SCALE516; (1998)4SCC552; [1998]2SCR501

..... expert in the particular branch of the law.(3) no doubt that 'professional services' have been brought within the scope of section 80-0 only by an amendment by the finance (no. 2) act, 1991 and that too, with effect from april 1, 1992, which is proposing to substitute the word 'technical or professional services' in place of the ..... hotel. section 80-0 was enacted with the twin objects of encouraging the export of indian technical know-how and augmentation of foreign exchange resources of the country. we have seen above that after the amendment of section 80-0 by finance (no. 2 act of 1991) the words 'technical or professional services' have been inserted in place of ..... january 6, 1972 which dealt with the scope and effect of amendment of section 80-0 which was substituted in place of earlier one by finance (no. 2) act, 1971 w.e.f. april 1, 1972. according to this circular, the objective of this provision is to encourage indian companies to develop technical know-how and make it available to .....

Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole Vs. Scott

Court : US Supreme Court

..... place of new prosecution. the upshot is that without a suppression remedy in revocation proceedings, there will often be no influence capable of deterring fourth amendment violations when parole revocation is a possible response to new crime. suppression in the revocation proceeding cannot be looked upon, then, as furnishing merely ..... we therefore hold that the federal exclusionary rule does not bar the introduction at parole revocation hearings of evidence seized in violation of parolees' fourth amendment rights. because the exclusionary rule precludes consideration of reliable, probative evidence, it imposes significant costs: it undeniably detracts from the truthfinding process and allows ..... can conduct a search at any time and for any reason or that the parolee relinquishes his fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches. rather, the parolee's signature acts as acknowledgement that the parole officer has a right to conduct reasonable searches of his residence listed on .....

M/S Rahabhar Productions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rajendra K. Tandon

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC1639; JT1998(2)SC674; 1998(2)SCALE497; (1998)4SCC49; [1998]2SCR470; 1998(1)LC581(SC)

..... may, within one year from the date of his retirement or within a period of one year from the date of commencement of the delhi rent control (amendment) act, 1988 whichever is later apply to the controller for recovering the immediate possession of such premises.(2) where the landlord is an employee of the central government or ..... the union territory of delhi, a residential accommodation either in his own name or in the name of his wife and dependent child.12. the act was further amended by the delhi rent control (amendment) act, 1988 (57 of 1988) with effect from 5.10.1988 when three new sections, namely, section 14b, 14c & 14d were introduced in the ..... rent controller for eviction of the tenants for their personal bona fide requirements.11. by the delhi control (amendment) act, 1976 (18 of 1976), which came into force with effect from 1.12.1975, section 14a was introduced in the act which gave special rights, to recover immediate possession, to a landlord who, being a person in occupation .....

Commissioner of Income Tax, T.N. Vs. S. Balasubramanian

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC1424; (1998)146CTR(SC)130; [1998]230ITR934(SC); JT1998(2)SC608; 1998(2)SCALE429; (1998)3SCC596; [1998]2SCR415

..... assets under section 2(47).' after examining a number of authorities in a detailed judgment, this court came to the conclusion that the partnership firm under the indian partnership act, 1932 is not a distinct legal entity apart from the partners constituting it and equally in law, the firm, as such, has no separate rights of ..... been wrongly allowed. and the income-tax officer will be entitled to recompute the total income of the assessee for the relevant previous years and make the necessary amendment as set out in that section. these two conditions are: (1) that at any time before the expiry of eight years from the end of the previous ..... originally allowed shall be deemed to have been wrongly allowed, and the assessing officer may, notwithstanding anything contained in this act, recompute the total income of the assessee for the relevant previous year and make the necessary amendment, and the provisions of section 154 shall, so far as may be, apply thereto, the period four years specified .....

Palani Ammal Vs. Viswanatha Chettiar (Dead) and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC1309; JT1998(2)SC457; 1998(2)SCALE300; (1998)3SCC654; [1998]2SCR212

..... act is extended to the municipal town, township or village in which the land is situate, or within one month after ..... a suit in ejectment has been instituted or proceeding under section 41 of the presidency small cause courts act, 1882, taken by the landlord, may, within one month of the date of the publication of madras city tenants' protection (amendment) act, 1979 in the tamil nadu government gazette or of the date with effect from which this ..... connection relied upon the two earlier division bench judgments of the same high court, as mentioned above. in our view, on the scheme of the protection act which we have considered the aforesaid conclusion to which the division bench reached is quite justified and well sustained. however learned senior counsel for the defendant vehemently .....

Steel Co. Vs. Citizens for Better Environment

Court : US Supreme Court

..... federal court "to recover damages in excess of $3,000 from ... agents of the federal bureau of investigation" for allegedly violating their fourth and fifth amendment rights. 327 u. s., at 679. the question whether petitioners' injuries were redressable-"whether federal courts can grant money recovery for damages said to have ..... when the claim is "so insubstantial, implausible, foreclosed by prior decisions of this court, or otherwise completely devoid of merit as not to involve a federal controversy." oneida indian nation of n. y. v. county of oneida, 414 u. s. 661 , 666 (1974); see also romero v. international terminal operating co., 358 u. ..... question and a question of article iii standing. in that case, the united states, as respondent, argued that petitioner lacked standing under the administrative procedure act and under the constitution.4 rather than taking up the constitutional issue, the court stated: "where ... congress has authorized public officials to perform certain functions .....

Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Vs. K.M. Krishnaiah

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998IIAD(SC)485; AIR1998SC1132; 1998(2)ALT22(SC); 1998(2)BLJR994; JT1998(2)SC231; (1998)IIIMLJ49(SC); 1998(2)SCALE119; (1998)3SCC331; [1998]2SCR9

..... perry v. clissold 1907 ac 73, that was also the law applicable in our country and it was this principle that was engrafted into articles 64 and 65 of the indian limitation act, 1963. the said articles were, it was held, declaratory of the law. the following observations of hidayatullah, j. (as he then was) place the matter beyond any ..... 29 stood 'extinguished'. it stood extinguished, in any event, between 12.1.1946 and 30.8.1969 when ttd dispossessed the plaintiff. the suit of the plaintiff, as amended, based on possessory title was therefore rightly decreed by the second appellate court. the plaintiff who was dispossessed on 30.8.69 could, even if the 6 months period ..... plaintiff then filed an application cmp no 289 of 1970 on 25.7.70 under order 6 rule 17 cpc (beyond 6 months from the date of dispossession) for amendment of plaint and converted the suit into one for possession. the appellate court too held that the plaintiff had proved neither title nor possession to the suit property. the .....

Mariyappa and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC1334; JT1998(1)SC734; (1998)IIIMLJ34(SC); 1998(1)SCALE672; (1998)3SCC276; [1998]1SCR988; 1998(1)LC658(SC)

..... was whether the subsequent amendments made in 1958 and 1964 to section 21 of the penal code enlarging the definition of public ..... imparted into the subsequent act also, would render the subsequent act wholly unworkable and ineffectual; and(d) where the amendment of the previous act, either expressly or by necessary intendment, applies the said provisions to the subsequent act.'24. in that case, the position was that the prevention of corruption act, 1947 adopted the definition of public servant from section 21 of the indian penal code, question .....