Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 11 amendment of section 11 Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan Page 5 of about 1,309 results (0.140 seconds)

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Jaipal Singh Yadav and ors Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... 54/71 23. the immediate question which would arise is, is it fatal not to have the gazette publication before hand in accordance with the amended section 45 of the act of 1950 or can such a policy decision with state's approval to this effect could still survive?. the answer, in the opinion of this ..... scc522 dhananjay malik and ors. v. state of uttaranchal and ors. : (2008) 4 scc171 amlan jyoti borooah v. state of assam : (2009) 3 scc227and k.a. nagamani v. indian airlines and ors. (supra). . the judgment referred to above applies even to sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment ..... than agricultural land'. this restricted interpretation of the word `property' had to be given otherwise the act would have become unconstitutional.30. similarly, in kedarnath vs. state of bihar air1962sc955 this court had to construe section 124- a of the indian penal code which relates to the offence of sedition which makes a person punishable who `by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Puneet Shrivastava Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... 54/71 23. the immediate question which would arise is, is it fatal not to have the gazette publication before hand in accordance with the amended section 45 of the act of 1950 or can such a policy decision with state's approval to this effect could still survive?. the answer, in the opinion of this ..... scc522 dhananjay malik and ors. v. state of uttaranchal and ors. : (2008) 4 scc171 amlan jyoti borooah v. state of assam : (2009) 3 scc227and k.a. nagamani v. indian airlines and ors. (supra). . the judgment referred to above applies even to sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment ..... than agricultural land'. this restricted interpretation of the word `property' had to be given otherwise the act would have become unconstitutional.30. similarly, in kedarnath vs. state of bihar air1962sc955 this court had to construe section 124- a of the indian penal code which relates to the offence of sedition which makes a person punishable who `by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Harveer Singh Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... 54/71 23. the immediate question which would arise is, is it fatal not to have the gazette publication before hand in accordance with the amended section 45 of the act of 1950 or can such a policy decision with state's approval to this effect could still survive?. the answer, in the opinion of this ..... scc522 dhananjay malik and ors. v. state of uttaranchal and ors. : (2008) 4 scc171 amlan jyoti borooah v. state of assam : (2009) 3 scc227and k.a. nagamani v. indian airlines and ors. (supra). . the judgment referred to above applies even to sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment ..... than agricultural land'. this restricted interpretation of the word `property' had to be given otherwise the act would have become unconstitutional.30. similarly, in kedarnath vs. state of bihar air1962sc955 this court had to construe section 124- a of the indian penal code which relates to the offence of sedition which makes a person punishable who `by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Surendra Kumar Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... 54/71 23. the immediate question which would arise is, is it fatal not to have the gazette publication before hand in accordance with the amended section 45 of the act of 1950 or can such a policy decision with state's approval to this effect could still survive?. the answer, in the opinion of this ..... scc522 dhananjay malik and ors. v. state of uttaranchal and ors. : (2008) 4 scc171 amlan jyoti borooah v. state of assam : (2009) 3 scc227and k.a. nagamani v. indian airlines and ors. (supra). . the judgment referred to above applies even to sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment ..... than agricultural land'. this restricted interpretation of the word `property' had to be given otherwise the act would have become unconstitutional.30. similarly, in kedarnath vs. state of bihar air1962sc955 this court had to construe section 124- a of the indian penal code which relates to the offence of sedition which makes a person punishable who `by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Bhanwar Lal Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... complete procedure is changed and requisition for increasing the number of vacancies was sent to the commission on 11.10.2012 after the date of amendment, therefore, there was no occasion for the respondent rajasthan public service commission to include those additional/increased vacancies in the present selection process because ..... answer scripts evaluated by the same examiner, therefore, it becomes necessary to distribute the answer scripts amongst several examiners for evaluation with the paper-setter acting as head-examiner. when more than one examiners evaluate the answer scripts relative to a subject disparity will creep into the marks awarded by different ..... or notification issued/published calling for applications constitutes a representation to the public and the authority issuing it is bound by such representation. it cannot act contrary to it. one reason behind this proposition is that if it were known that persons who obtained the qualifications after the prescribed date but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2014 (HC)

Shanker Lal Vs. Madan Lal

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... that the finding recorded by the courts in the earlier litigation, which resulted in the judgment and decree dated 24.11.1997 operates as res judicata. based on the amended suit and written statement, post remand, the trial court framed only one issue as to whether the plaintiff was entitled to possession of the suit property?. on behalf of ..... court. after the present suit was remanded to the trial court, an application under order vi, rule 17 cpc was filed by the plaintiff and the plaint was amended and the allegations contained in para 3 of the original plaint, regarding the trespass by the defendant were deleted and it was claimed that in view of the judgment ..... per month, which was rs.350/- now; on refusal to receive rent, the same was being deposited under section 19a of the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act, 1950; the execution of the rent note dated 28.03.1969 and the compromise dated 04.11.1997 were disputed and it was claimed that both the documents were forged .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2014 (HC)

Sant Shri Asharam Bapu Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... to perform oral sex. thus, the said allegation is covered under the definition of penetrative sexual assault given in section 3(d) of the aforesaid act as well as under section 375 (a) ipc of the amended act of 2013. the argument that the prosecutrix was not under the control or custody of the petitioner or that the said incident did not happen in ..... stand is consistent. the statement of the prosecutrix under section 164 of the cr.p.c.cannot be ignored in view of the provision of section 114-a of the indian evidence act, 1872. there is no reason for her to make any false allegation against the petitioner. there is no dispute with the provision of law that it would be improper ..... dt. kamal singh, rajesh u/s.1.9.02013 circle sharma and 143/341/323/353/332/ p.s.mahamandir inspector 14 ors.225/120-b of the ipc and u/s 3 of pdpp act. jodhpur 3 fir no.101 dt. bhawani bharat bhai u/s318.2013, p.s.singh s/o & 10 147/148/149/307/395/42 jodhpur west. prabhu .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2013 (HC)

M/S A. Infrastructure Ltd Vs. C.T.O. Spl. Cirlce Bhilwara

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... filed by the petitioner cannot be accepted for more than one reason; firstly, the notification s.o.377 has been issued under section 8(3) of the act, which does not amend schedule-i to include the said goods under exempted category; secondly, s.o.371, which is 13 very specific in terms and issued under section 8(2 ..... of fly ash 25% more by weight was inserted as entry 60a, whereafter on 05.07.2006 by another notification issued under section 8(2) of the act, the schedule-i was amended and entry 60a was substituted. thereafter on 09.03.2007 three notifications were issued dealing with a.c.sheets, whereby, by s.o.371 issued under ..... ).the state government being of the opinion that it is expedient in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendments in schedule-i appended to the said act, namely :- amendment in schedule-i appended to the said act, the existing expression appearing in column no.3 against s.no.60a, shall be substituted by the following expression, namely:- ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2013 (HC)

M/S a Infrastructure Ltd Vs. C.T.O.Spl.Circle, Bhilwara

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... filed by the petitioner cannot be accepted for more than one reason; firstly, the notification s.o.377 has been issued under section 8(3) of the act, which does not amend schedule-i to include the said goods under exempted category; secondly, s.o.371, which is 13 very specific in terms and issued under section 8(2 ..... of fly ash 25% more by weight was inserted as entry 60a, whereafter on 05.07.2006 by another notification issued under section 8(2) of the act, the schedule-i was amended and entry 60a was substituted. thereafter on 09.03.2007 three notifications were issued dealing with a.c.sheets, whereby, by s.o.371 issued under ..... ).the state government being of the opinion that it is expedient in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendments in schedule-i appended to the said act, namely :- amendment in schedule-i appended to the said act, the existing expression appearing in column no.3 against s.no.60a, shall be substituted by the following expression, namely:- ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2013 (HC)

Bhanwar Lal Vs. Ramavtar

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... may, by notification in the official gazette, specify from time to time. . 8. from out of the above provision, after deletion of the words deleted by second amendment act, the remaining part of sub- section (2) would read as under: (2) it shall extend in first instance to such of the municipal areas which are comprising ..... ors. :2007. (3) dnj (raj.) 1363 held and observed as under:- 5. much was sought to be argued, that there has been amendment in the new rent control act, 2001, being rajasthan rent control (second amendment) act, 2005, whereby in sub-section (2) of section 1, the expression having a population exceeding fifty thousand as per 1991 census . has been ..... was dismissed as not pressed on 08.04.2005; the rent control act, 2001 ('the act of 2001'), which came into force on 25.02.2003 and where after rajasthan rent control (second amendment) act, 2005 ('the act of 2005') came into force on 22.02.2006 and the act of 2001 was made applicable to all municipalities and, therefore, the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //