Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 11 amendment of section 11 Sorted by: recent Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 3,288 results (0.103 seconds)

Sep 18 2013 (HC)

Present: Shri Rajiv Agnihotri Advocate for the Vs. State of Haryana an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... from new delhi market was used in installation of the machinery, the investment of which was rs. 113/- lacs. the petitioner contends that a new loco boiler was not available in the indian market and could not have been imported under olg policy and thus purchasing it locally (when the same had been remodelled before such purchase), was a ..... also of no avail. stand of the petitioner 6. contention of counsel for the petitioner is that application for exemption of sales tax was pending consideration, when clarificatory amendment was brought in rule 28-a, explaining, that a unit installing old machinery to the extent of 25% of the total costs of the machinery was also included ..... becomes apparent that the amendment is only explanatory in nature and it only explains as to what extent old machinery could be used in the installation of a 'new industrial unit', to be entitled to the status of 'new industrial unit' under the rules so as to be eligible for such benefits under the act and the rules.14 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2007 (HC)

Pritpal Singh, Retired Judge (Since Deceased) Through His Legal Repres ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)150PLR439

..... the case of any other judge. 5. however, it may be noticed that the provisions of part i and iii have been amended subsequently by actno. 7 of 1999. by virtue of the said amending act, special additional pension was contemplated to be rs. 5200/ per annum in respect of each completed year of service for pension but ..... as mohan lal tripathi v. the district magistrate, rae bareilly and ors. : [1992]3scr338 , j. k. industries limited etc. etc v. the chief inspector of factories and boilers and ors. etc etc. : (1997)illj722sc and haryana state co-operative land development bank limited v. haryana state cooperative land development bank employees union and anr. 2004 service cases ..... and a judge of this court, the conditions of service is required to be determined by the rules for the time being applicable to the members of the indian administrative service on deputation to the government of india holding the rank of joint secretary to the government of india stationed at new delhi. 16. in terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2004 (HC)

Harwinder Singh Vs. Balwinder Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)138PLR126

..... to be raised by seeking amendment of pleadings. the case referred to is clearly distinguishable.7. the admission is the best evidence. the admitted fact need not be proved. however, it is equally well settled that admissions are not conclusive as contemplated under section 31 of the indian evidence act, 1872 which stipulated that ..... in the written statement are not manipulated or fraudulent as such admissions have been made by way of written statement. the defendant has given explanation seeking amendment and whether such explanation is credible and worth acceptance, it is required to be examined after the parties are genuine opportunity to lead evidence whether ..... such admissions contained in the written statement are manipulated or fraudulent. the defendant will have an opportunity to lead evidence only if the amendment is allowed. if an opportunity is given the defendant will have an opportunity to prove that the admissions contained in the written statement are not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2016 (HC)

M/s. Dhanna Mal Mulkh Raj Vs. The Secretary to Government of Punjab an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... entire state. since the transaction in the present case admittedly relates to the period of 1996-97, which is much prior to the notification dated 15.11.2002, therefore, the amended provision, brought in rule 29 w.e.f. 15.11.2002, would not be applicable to the case of the petitioner. insofar as rule 30 is concerned, which has basically ..... the said area to the purchaser or to some other person on behalf of the purchaser. (8) if in the case of any transaction any two or more of the acts mentioned in sub-rule (7) have been performed within the boundaries of two or more notified market areas the market fee shall be payable to the committee within whose jurisdiction ..... in which delivery is actually made. section 43 deals with the power of the state government to make rule by way of notification for carrying out the purposes of the act. rule 29 deals with the levy and collection of fee on the sale and purchase of the agricultural produce. the said rule 29, for the purpose of ready reference, is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2016 (HC)

The Director, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Researc ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and others case (supra) shows that the constitutional validity of the constitution (seventy-seventh amendment) act, 1995, the constitution (eighty-first amendment) act, 2000, the constitution (eighty-second amendment) act, 2000 and the constitution (eighty fifth amendment) act, 2001 has been upheld. however, there is no mandate in this judgment to the ..... . 127. subject to above, we uphold the constitutional validity of the constitution(seventy-seventh amendment) act, 1995, the constitution (eighty-first amendment) act, 2000, the constitution (eighty-second amendment) act, 2000 and the constitution (eighty-fifth amendment) act, 2001. there is a clear mandate in m. nagaraj that the state which prefers ..... consideration consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration. a provision has been introduced in the article 335 by the constitution (82nd amendment) act, 2000 w.e.f. 8.9.2000 to the effect that while making reservation in matters of promotion to the members of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2015 (HC)

Prem Kumar Vs. Krishan Kumar Sharma and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... koteshwaramma and another vs. chakiri yanadi and another 2011(9) scc 788 it has been held by the supreme court that in view of the amendment of section 6 of the hindu succession act, 1956, a daughter is entitled to share in the ancestral property and is a co-parcener as if she had been a son w.e. ..... code of criminal procedure, 1973 for maintenance, it was deemed necessary that there should be simple, inexpensive and speedy provisions to claim maintenance for the parents. the act is not restricted to only providing maintenance but cast an obligation on the persons who inherit the property of their aged relatives to maintain such aged relatives. one of ..... aforesaid questions in the context of the factual matrix, it is necessary to analyze the relevant provisions of the said act. the statement of objects and reasons set out that the traditional norms and values of the indian society which lay stress on providing care for elderly getting diluted due to the withering of the joint family system, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2015 (HC)

Vijay Kumar Yadav and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... observed as below :- " .... an amending act may be purely clarificatory to clear a meaning of a provision of the principal act which was already implicit. a clarificatory amendment of this nature will have retrospective effect and, therefore, if the principal act was existing law when the constitution came into force, the amending act also will be part of the existing ..... the rules as neither the executive instructions, nor such clarification can be a substitute to a provision that has to be incorporated by way of an amendment by a legislative process only. the respondents in their reply have stated that since the inception of 1930 rules, the state has always taken into ..... hon'ble supreme court considered the interpretation of the word 'especially' contained in section 106 of the indian evidence act, 1872, which was an exception to section 101 thereof, vis-a-vis sections 112 and 113 of the railways act and it was observed as below :- "13. we recognize that an illustration does not exhaust the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2015 (HC)

Rajiv Kumar Gupta Vs. Susham Singla and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... given to one rajiv kumar gupta for entering into the agreement to sell. in essence, there is no separate authorisation in writing. however, section 14 of the indian partnership act, 1932 (for short "1932 act") deals with the property of the firm. the same is reproduced herein under:- "14. the property of the firm.-subject to contract between the partners, the ..... to arbitrator, whose award shall be final and binding on the parties. the proceedings shall be held under the provision of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 and rules framed hereunder and as amended from time to time. the parties agree that in the event of any dispute, the court of patiala shall have the jurisdiction to deal with ..... the objections, the firm and sunhena gupta had filed the objections. 32. it is a matter of record that during the pendency of the objections, an application seeking amendment of the objections at the behest of susham singla was filed, which was allowed vide order dated 5.6.2009 and in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2015 (HC)

K.C. Sareen and Another Vs. Punjab National Bank and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... relation to conduct of the employee while working with the employer, but on account of criminal proceedings initiated for an offence under section 498a ipc read with section 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961. for such conviction, the employer was not responsible and, therefore, the employer has not been rightly made responsible for payment of ..... as jaipal singh v. union of india and others 2002 (2) slr 197. in the said case, jaipal singh was convicted for an offence under section 302 ipc, but after acquittal, he was reinstated. the hon'ble supreme court noticed the distinction between proceedings initiated by the department itself and by the third person. the ..... initially, the writ petition was being heard by the learned single bench, but the petitioners thereafter sought amendment in the writ petition, so as to challenge the vires of section 10(1)(b)(i) of the banking regulation act, 1949. since there was a challenge to the statutory provisions, the matter was placed before the division .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 2015 (HC)

Rajnish Singh Vs. M/s. A and A Chemicals and Glue Works (Pvt. Ltd.) an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... pendency of the suit and accordingly, the trial court, while allowing application under order 1, rule 10 cpc, also granted liberty to file the amended plaint. accordingly, the amended plaint was filed and the order dated 8.5.2013 attained finality and, therefore, the application at the behest of the petitioner-defendant was not maintainable ..... of civil procedure (annexure p-5). the said application was allowed by the trial court vide order dated 8.5.2013. without moving separate application for amendment of the plaint, respondent-plaintiff incorporated the relief of declaration in the headnote and the prayer clause and also added paragraphs 14 and 16 and applications ( ..... amended copies of the summons and of the plaint shall be served on the new defendant and, if the court thinks fit, on the original defendant." 8. no doubt, the proceedings against defendant no. 3 shall begin from the date when he was impleaded keeping in view the provisions of section 21 of the indian limitation act, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //