Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.9860/2012(S) Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Mandal Abhiyanta Sangh & otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.11083/2012(S) Devendra Kumar Tiwari -Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.12298/2012(S) Arvind Kumar Upadhyay and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.12302/2012(S) J.P.Soni and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.And. WRIT PETITION NO.22145/2012(S) Deepak Kumar Shrivastava and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi. 2 Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3. Shri B.L.Nag, learned counsel for the interveners......[in W.P.No.9860/2012(S)].Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respond...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
[1]. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Arbitration Appeal No.3/2008 1. ANSALDO Energia, S.P.A., A Company duly organized and existing under the Laws of Italy with its Principal Office located in via N. Lorenzi, 8, 16152, Geneva, Italy.2. Asia Power Projects Private Limited, (Formerly known as ANSALDO Services Private Limited), having its Registered Office at No.50/1, Residence Road, Third Floor, Gupta Tower, Bangalor025. ..........APPELLANTS Versus 1. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board, Through its Secretary, Shakti Bhawan, Nayagaon, Jabalpur (M.P.) 2. M.P. Power General Co. Ltd., Through its Managing Director, Shakti Bhawan, Nayagaon, Jabalpur (M.P.) ..........RESPONDENTS Present: Hon. Shri Justice Krishn Kumar Lahoti, Acting C.J.Hon. Smt. Justice Vimla Jain ___________________________________________________________________ Shri S.U. Kamdar, learned Senior Advocate with Shri Nahoush Shah, Shri Manot Sharma and Shri Alok Hoonka, Advocates for the appellants. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
F.A. No.112/1991 1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR Single Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA First Appeal No.112/1991 (Date of filing of Civil Suit :11. 03.1976) APPELLANTS:1. State of Madhya Pradesh through Defendant No.4 the Collector, Hoshangabad. Defendant No.1 2. Competent Authority, M.P. Ceiling Agricultural Holdings Act, Harda. Versus RESPONDENTS 1 Mohan Sugar Mills Limited Plaintiff No.1 Registered Office, Harda. Plaintiff No.2 2. The Central Trading Company Private Ltd., Registered Office, Harda. Defendant No.2 3. Seth Vallabh Das Modi (since deceased) not by LRs:- (i) Smt. Pushpa Devi wd/o Seth Vallabh Das Modi, (ii) Krishna Das s/o Seth Vallabh Das Modi (iii) Brijesh Das s/o Seth Vallabh Das Modi All R/o 145, Garhi Pura, Harda (iv) Smt. Chandawali w/o Ramnarayan, R/o Somani Mohalla, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan (v) Yamuna Devi w/o Mahesh Kumar Dalni, R/o Agrawal Colony, 499, Jabalpur. (vi) Smt. Mridula Vyas w/o Narendra Kumar Vyas, R/o 860, Mahaveer Nagar, II Kota...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.11811/2008 (s) Ku. Jayshree Nandeshwar Vs. The State of M.P. & another Present: Honble Shri Rajendra Menon, J.& Hon'ble Mrs. Vimla Jain, J.______________________________________________________ Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Nirmala Nayak, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1. Shri V. S. Shroti, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Ashish Shroti, for respondent No.2. __________________________________________________ ORDER (...82013) Per : Shri Rajendra Menon, J.Petitioner who was a Judicial Officer has filed this writ petition challenging the orders Annexures P/1 and P/ 2 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority respectively removing her from service.2. The Disciplinary Authority vide Annexure P/1 dated 22.1.2008 imposed the punishment of dismissal from service after conducting a departmental enquiry into certain 2 allegations of misconduct committed by the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION NO.22017 of 2011 M/s Ideal Minerals and another Versus. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors For Petitioners : Shri Manot Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent No.1/ : Shri Ashok Chourasia, Govt. Advocate. State For respondents No.2 & 3 : Shri Akshay Dharmadhikari, Advocate. ORDER (07.08.2013) Per U. C. Maheshwari J.1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the order dated 21.01.2011 (Annexure-P-1) passed by the respondent no.5 revisional authority (Constituted under Section 30 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 (In short the Act) in revision application/file No.16/04/2007-RC-II whereby, dismissing their revision filed under Section 30 of the Act read with Rule 54 of Mineral Concession Rules 1960 ( in short MCR), the order No.2-64/05/12 dated 27.10.2006, passed by the respondent no.1 State of M.P., allowing the respective applications...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 W.P. No.12760/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA Writ Petition No.12760 / 2012 PETITIONER : Rakesh Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Banwarilal Agrawal, R/o. Barapatthar, District Seoni, Narsingh Ward, Jabalpur (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENTS:1. Brijesh Goutam, S/o. Garisingh Goutam, Proprietor, Shrushti Engineers, R/o. Barapatthar, Seoni, Tehsil and District Seoni (M.P.) 2. Nirmal Kumar Chourasia, S/o. Gokul Prasad Chourasia, Gurunanak Ward, Seoni, Tehsil and District Seoni. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioner/plaintiff by Shri Manot Sanghi, Advocate. Respondent No.2/defendant by Shri Sharad Gupta, Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (01.08.2013) By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the validity of impugned order dated 10.11.2011 as well ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 W.P. No.7083/2013 M/s Digicable Network India Pvt. Ltd. Union of India & others 15.5.2013 Shri Brian D'Silva, learned Sr. Advocate with Shri Abhijeet Awasthy, Counsel for petitioner. Shri R.S.Siddiqui, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondents No.1 & 6. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, GA for respondents No.2 to 5. Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Counsel for intervener M/s Siti Cable Network Ltd. Shri Anil Khare, learned Sr.Advocate with Shri Priyankush Jain for intervener Indian Broadcasting Foundation. Shri Siddiqui submits that he has filed reply in W.P.No.5323/2013 and is adopting the return filed in the same case. He can do this by filing an appropriate application alongwith return and supplying copy of it to the petitioner. This be done within a period of one week from today. I.A.No.6482/2013 filed by intervener M/s Siti Cable Network Ltd. for vacation of ad interim writ Parties are heard on this application Learned counsel for petitioner submits that Union of India has not filed return t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR Election Petition No.20/2009 Ramlal Kol, son of Ramsharan Kol, aged about 36 years, resident of village Hirwara, Tahsil Mudwara, Distt. Katni ...Petitioner Versus Moti Kashyap @ Motilal, son of Late Mewalal, resident of 1220, Durga Chowk, Phootatal, Ravindra Ward, P.O. Gurundi Bazar, Jabalpur ...Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Arvind Shrivastava, Advocate for petitioner. Shri G.S. Baghel, Advocate for respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date of Hearing :10. 1.2013 Date of Judgment :10. 4.2013 JUDGMENT In this petition, election of the returned candidate viz. the respondent to Badwara Legislative Assembly Constituency No.91 has been called in question on the grounds mentioned in clause (a) and sub-clause (i) of clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 100 of Representation...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
M Cr.C.No.3938/13 3.4.2013 Shri Ashish Shroti Counsel for the applicant. Heard. Notice be issued to the respondents by both modes on payment of PF within 3 clear working days, returnable within 4 weeks. Heard on I.A.No.7215/2013, an application for grant of stay. It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that as Civil suit No.1-A of 2010 is already pending in the court of Civil Judge Class-II, Naogaon, the proceeding u/s 145 Cr.P.C.in case No.23/2009 before Sub Divisional Magistrate, Naogaon District Chatarpur cannot be allowed. Looking to the circumstances of the case, I.A.No.7215/2013 is allowed and it is directed that proceedings pending in Case No.23/09 u/s145 of Cr.P.C.pending before SDM, Naogaon shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing. C.C.As per rules. (M.A.SIDDIQUI) JUDGE sb M.Cr.C.No.3443/13 3.4.2013 Shri Sankalp Kochar, Counsel for the applicant. R.Kushwaha, PL for the Sate. Heard. Call for the case diary then list for admission. Heard on I..A.No.6319/2013, an ap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 S.A No.440/1996 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.440/1996 APPELLANT : JAGDISH PRASAD Vs. RESPONDENTS : KANHAIYALAL @ KANDHAI AND OTHERS. Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice R.S. Jha. For the appellant : Shri Ravish Agrawal, Senior Counsel with Shri Abhishek Singh, Advocate. For the respondents : Shri N. S. Ruprah, Advocate. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (02/04/2013) The appellant has filed this appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 2.4.1996 passed by the District Judge, Panna in Civil Appeal No.19-A/86 affirming and confirming the judgment and decree dated 24.10.1986 passed by the Civil Judge Class-I, Panna in Civil Suit No.1- A/79-85 thereby dismissing the suit of the appellant claiming a decree for declaration as owner in possession of house No.53/6 situated in Mohalla Raniganj, Panna as well as for a permanent injunction prohibiting the respondents from demolishing the wall of h...
Tag this Judgment!