Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 W.P. No.7083/2013 M/s Digicable Network India Pvt. Ltd. Union of India & others 15.5.2013 Shri Brian D'Silva, learned Sr. Advocate with Shri Abhijeet Awasthy, Counsel for petitioner. Shri R.S.Siddiqui, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondents No.1 & 6. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, GA for respondents No.2 to 5. Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Counsel for intervener M/s Siti Cable Network Ltd. Shri Anil Khare, learned Sr.Advocate with Shri Priyankush Jain for intervener Indian Broadcasting Foundation. Shri Siddiqui submits that he has filed reply in W.P.No.5323/2013 and is adopting the return filed in the same case. He can do this by filing an appropriate application alongwith return and supplying copy of it to the petitioner. This be done within a period of one week from today. I.A.No.6482/2013 filed by intervener M/s Siti Cable Network Ltd. for vacation of ad interim writ Parties are heard on this application Learned counsel for petitioner submits that Union of India has not filed return t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 19.8.2014, whereby the petitioners were held to be disqualified for membership of the committee. The consequential order of the same date, Annexure P-1, is also called in question, whereby it was held that the elected Board of Directors has ceased to function for want of quorum. Accordingly, in place of Board of Directors, an Administrator is appointed. 2. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioner-Board was constituted for five years pursuant to an election held on 4.4.2008. The term of the Board was five years, i.e., up to 3.4.2013. Before the Board could complete its tenure, it was suspended on 9.12.2009. This suspension order was challenged before this Court in WP No. 4536/2011. The Division Bench by order dated 30.1.2014 (Annexure P/4) set aside the said suspension order. The said order of this Court was unsuccessfully put to test before the Apex Court in SLP No.10826/2014. The...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2009ACJ207
Sanjay Yadav, J.1. This order will govern the disposal of M.A. Nos. 692 and 803 of 2001 arising out of composite order dated 31.7.2001, passed by Fourth Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gwalior whereby the Claim Case Nos. 71, 72, 73 and 74 of 2000 put forth by the claimants therein were rejected on the ground that the negligence of the driver of the offending vehicle was not proved. The present appeals are against the order passed in the Claim Case Nos. 74 and 73 of 2000 respectively.2. The facts in nutshell giving rise to the aforesaid claim applications are that on 26.9.1996, Chandraprakash Parashar, Lalit Prasad Sharma, Bunti alias Dinesh Agarwal and others were travelling in a jeep bearing registration No. MP 06-D 0116. The said jeep was driven by Ramveer Singh. At about 10 p.m. when the said jeep had reached at loop road opposite Sharma Farm on A.B. Road met with an accident having head-on collision with oncoming truck. The said accident resulted in casualties of Chandr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
M Cr.C.No.3938/13 3.4.2013 Shri Ashish Shroti Counsel for the applicant. Heard. Notice be issued to the respondents by both modes on payment of PF within 3 clear working days, returnable within 4 weeks. Heard on I.A.No.7215/2013, an application for grant of stay. It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that as Civil suit No.1-A of 2010 is already pending in the court of Civil Judge Class-II, Naogaon, the proceeding u/s 145 Cr.P.C.in case No.23/2009 before Sub Divisional Magistrate, Naogaon District Chatarpur cannot be allowed. Looking to the circumstances of the case, I.A.No.7215/2013 is allowed and it is directed that proceedings pending in Case No.23/09 u/s145 of Cr.P.C.pending before SDM, Naogaon shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing. C.C.As per rules. (M.A.SIDDIQUI) JUDGE sb M.Cr.C.No.3443/13 3.4.2013 Shri Sankalp Kochar, Counsel for the applicant. R.Kushwaha, PL for the Sate. Heard. Call for the case diary then list for admission. Heard on I..A.No.6319/2013, an ap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
C.V. Sirpurkar, J. 1. This civil revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred challenging the legality, propriety and correctness of order dated 18/10/2014 passed by the 13th Civil Judge Class-I, Bhopal in M.J.C. No. 10/2011, whereby learned court below had rejected an application under Order 19 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for permission to cross-examine respondent No. 1 (a). 2. The facts giving rise to this civil revision may be summarized thus: The applicant and respondent No.2, who are real brother and sister, jointly filed Regular Civil Suit No. 585/2006 against respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4, for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of the suit land. Civil Suit No. 585/2006 was decreed in favour of the applicant and respondent No.2 on 28/07/2006. About 4 years after the judgment and decree, the deceased/respondent No.1 filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure through his power of attorney holde...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : I(1990)ACC520
P.D. Mulye, J. 1. This judgment shall also govern the disposal of M.A.No.33 of 1982 The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Smt. Anupama and Ors.as both these appeals are directed against the same award dated 12th October,81 given by the Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhar in claim case No. 3 of 1980.2. M.A.No.25 of 82 has been filed by the claimants for enhancement of compensation, whereas M.A.NO.33 of 1982 has been filed by the Insurance Company challenging their liability for the entire amount of compensation as awarded by the Tribunal.3. The facts giving rise to these appeals, which are no longer in dispute and as found proved, may be stated, in brief, thus : B us number CPF9187 is owned by the Indian Tourism Development Corporation, of which on the relevant day of the accident, which took place on 24.6.79, Laxman Rao was the driver in the employment of the Indian Tourism Development Corporation. The said bus was insured with the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company Li...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2(1988)ACC237; 1988MPLJ526
P.D. Mulye, J.1. This judgment shall also govern the disposal of M.A. No. 33 of 1982 The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Anupama and Ors. as both these appeals are directed against the sami award dated 12th October,'81 given by the Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhar in Claim Case No. 3 of 1980.2. M.A. No. 25 of 82 has been filed by the claimants for enhancement of compensation, whereas M.A. No. 33 of 1982 has been filed by the Insurance Company challenging their liability for the entire amount of compensation as awarded by the Tribunal. 3. The facts giving rise to these appeals, which are no longer in dispute and as found proved, may be stated, in brief, thus : Bus number CPF 9187 is owned by the Indian Tourism Development Corporation, of which on the relevant day of the accident, which took place on 24 6-1979, Laxman Rao was driver in the employment of the Indian Tourism Development Corporation. The said bus was insured with the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Com...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
HIGHCOURTOFMADHYAPRADEESHJABALPUR (WritPetitionNo.5543/2010) M/s.VrijlalManilalandCo. Vs. RegionalProvidentFundCommissioner PRESENT: HONOURABLESHRIJUSTICEAJITSINGH HONOURABLESHRIJUSTICESANJAYYADAV Counselforpetitioner ShriAnoopNair,Advocate Counselforrespondent ShriJ.K.Pillai,Advocate ORDER (18/12/2012) ThefollowingorderoftheCourtwasdeliveredby SanjayYadav,J:OrderpassedinthisWritPetitionshallgovern thedisposalofWritPetitionNos.11347/2009RegionalProvident Fund Commissioner v. M/s. J.P. Tobacco Product Pvt. Ltd., 11348/2009RegionalProvidentFundCommissionerv.M/s.Vrijlal Manilal&Co.,11349/2009RegionalProvidentFundCommissioner v. D.C. Rathore and sons, 11350/2009 Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/s. Prabhudas Kishoredas Tobacco Co., 11368/2009 Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/s. J.P. Tobacco Product Pvt. Ltd. and 11369/2009 Regional Provident FundCommissionerv.M/s.ChhotabhaiJethabhaiPatel&Co.;asall these writ petitions are dire...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
F.A. No.742/2009 (1) HIGH COURT OF M. P. JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava First Appeal No.742/2009 Appellant Lalit Hurkat, S/o. Laxmi Narayan Hurkat, R/o. Veer Sawarkar Ward, Bina, District Sagar (M.P.) Vs. Respondent Smt. Premkali W/o. C.D. Cladius, R/o. Veer Sawarkar Ward, Bina, District Sagar (M.P.) _____________________________________________________ Shri Avinash Zargar and Shri Amit Bhurrak, Advocates for appellant. Shri Mohd. Ali and Shri Vijay Shukla, Advocates for respondent. _____________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (Delivered on this 17th day of January, 2013) Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2009 passed by learned First Additional District Judge, Khurai District Sagar in Civil Suit No.97-A/2006 whereby the suit of plaintiff for eviction on the ground envisaged under Section 12(1) (a) and (f) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act 1961 (for brevity Act.) has been decreed, this appeal under Sec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
F.A. No.740/2009 (1) HIGH COURT OF M. P. JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava First Appeal No.740/2009 Appellant Manohar S/o. Pannalal Rai, R/o. Katra Ward, Bina, District Sagar (M.P.) Vs. Respondent Smt. Premkali W/o. C.D. Cladius, R/o. Veer Sawarkar Ward, Bina, District Sagar (M.P.) _____________________________________________________ Shri Avinash Zargar and Shri Amit Bhurrak, Advocates for appellant. Shri Mohd. Ali and Shri Vijay Shukla, Advocates for respondent. _____________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (Delivered on this 17th day of January, 2013) Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2009 passed by learned First Additional District Judge, Khurai District Sagar in Civil Suit No.95-A/2006 whereby the suit of plaintiff for eviction on the ground envisaged under Section 12(1) (a) and (f) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act 1961 (for brevity Act.) has been decreed, this appeal under Section 96 of CPC has bee...
Tag this Judgment!