Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: recent Court: us supreme court Year: 1961 Page 6 of about 73 results (0.147 seconds)

J.K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1534; [1962]2SCR1; [1961]12STC429(SC)

..... to be assessed pursuant to the notification dated march 31, 1956, filed a petition under art. 226 before the allahabad high court and raised the contention that as the amendment act merely amended s. 3-a and did not in terms validate the impugned notification, no proceedings could validly be taken under that notification and that therefore the proposed levy was illegal. ..... on it. 10. with a view to remove the defect pointed out in adarsh bhandar v. sales tax officer : air1957all475 , the state legislature passed the uttar pradesh sales tax (amendment) act, 1957. that act received the assent of the president on august 31, 1957, and was published on september 3, 1957. it runs, so far as is material, as follows :- 'for sub-section ..... venkatarama aiyar, j.1. the petitioner is a company incorporated under the indian companies act, its registered office being at kanpur in the state of uttar pradesh, and it is carrying on business in the manufacture and sale of jute goods. by a notification dated .....

Burton Vs. Wilmington Parking Authority

Court : US Supreme Court

..... owned buildings. as the chancellor pointed out, in its lease with eagle, the authority could have affirmatively required eagle to discharge the responsibilities under the fourteenth amendment imposed upon the private enterprise as a consequence of state participation. but no state may effectively abdicate its responsibilities by either ignoring them or by merely ..... supreme court of delaware reversed, as we mentioned above, holding that eagle, "in the conduct of its business, is acting in a purely private capacity." it therefore denied appellant's claim under the fourteenth amendment. upon reaching the application of state law, it held, contrary to appellant's assertion that eagle maintained an inn, ..... 's tax exemption. page 365 u. s. 720 the authority further agreed to furnish heat for eagle's premises, gas service for the boiler room, and to make, at its own expense, all necessary structural repairs, all repairs to exterior surfaces except store fronts and any repairs caused by lessee' .....

Ranjit Singh Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC92; [1961]42ITR761(SC); [1962]1SCR966

..... s. 5 of the act came in for challenge on the ground that the income-tax officer could pick ..... sub-s. (4) of s. 5 of the act was bad, as it offended the provisions of art. 14 of the constitution. sub-section (4) of s. 5 of the act having been declared void, parliament passed the indian income-tax amendment act, 1954 amending s. 34 of the indian income-tax act, 1922. as a result of this amendment, the validity of sub-s. (1) of ..... out some out of the class of substantial tax evaders and refer their cases under sub-s. (1) of s. 5 while dealing with other such persons under the amended s. 34 of the indian income-tax act. in shree meenakshi mills ltd., madurai v. a. v. visvanatha sastri and another, : [1954]26itr713(sc) , sub-s. (1) of s. 5 of .....

Daji Krishnaji Desai Tambulkar Vs. Ganesh Vishnu Kulkarni and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1564; [1962]1SCR905

..... is the correctness of this order that is challenged in this appeal. 7. this appeal has no force. section 31 of the bombay tenancy act, 1939, made amendments to s. 9 of the act and the section after amendment reads : 'the rights of khots and privileged occupants shall be heritable and transferable'. 8. 'privileged occupant' included a permanent tenant under clause ..... laxman raut was void and that the plaintiff obtained good title under the sale deed in his favour in view of the amendment of s. 9 of the act by s. 31 of the bombay tenancy act, 1939 (act xxix of 1939), by which no consent of the khot was necessary for executing the sale deed in 1945. respondent no ..... (5) of s. 3 of the act. the bombay tenancy act received assent of the governor of bombay on april 2, 1940, but it came into force .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. ScIndia Steam Navigation Co. Lt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1633; [1961]42ITR589(SC); [1962]1SCR788

..... would be sufficient to dispose of the appeal : but counsel for the revenue submits that as it was never urged before the tribunal by the assessees that the amending act 8 of 1946 which made the compensation received by the assessees taxable as income, was brought into operation after the commencement of the year of assessment 1946- 47, ..... to the appellate tribunal which shall pass such orders as are necessary to dispose of the case conformably to such judgment...' 50. under the scheme of the indian income-tax act, the appellate tribunal is the sole judge of facts. the high court indisputably exercises a special advisory jurisdiction to record its opinion on questions submitted by the ..... furnishing the facts for the purpose of enabling the court to decide the question referred. it has been repeatedly laid down by the privy council that the indian act is not in pari materia with the british statute and that it will not be safe to construe it in the light of english decisions, vide commissioner .....

Mohanlal JaIn Vs. His Highness Maharaja Shri Sawai Man Singhji

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC73; [1962]1SCR702

..... lessened. 10. the privilege of ex-territoriality and exemption from civil jurisdiction except with the consent of the central government was one of long standing, and when the amendment act of 1951 was passed, sections 83 to 87 were re-enacted. we are not concerned with all the changes that were made, and reference to some of ..... them is unnecessary. section 86 was amended by deleting all references to ruling chiefs of indian states and the first sub-section was re-enacted as follows : '86. (1) no ruler of a foreign state may be sued in ..... british india, the rulers of states and the government of india entered into covenants and agreements. in those covenants, it was agreed that the privileges, dignities and titles of indian princes would be continued to be recognised. when the constitution was enacted, the assurance in the covenants was respected, and art. 362 was included in the constitution. it .....

Mst. Jadao Bahuji Vs. Municipal Committee, Khandwa and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1962]1SCR633

..... by the federal legislature, the tax even in excess of rs. 50 continued to be valid. 16. there can be no doubt that if a law was passed after the amendment and sought to impose taxes on professions etc., for any period after march 31, 1939, it had to conform to the limit prescribed by s. 142a(2). the prohibition ..... to make retrospective laws; and as pointed out by gwyer, c.j. in the united provinces v. atiqa begum [1940] f.c.r. 110, the burden of proving that indian legislatures 'were subject to a strange and unusual prohibition against retrospective legislation lay upon those who asserted it'. this has not been asserted in this case, as, indeed, it could ..... to pass a retrospective and validating law was taken away by the enactment of s. 142-a and the amendment of the entry in the government of india act. it is on this point that the difference in the high court arose. the amendment of the entry is of no special significance, because it only subjects the otherwise plenary powers to the .....

Ashok Leyland Ltd. Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1433; [1962]1SCR607; [1961]12STC379(SC)

..... taxing transactions in the course of inter-state trade and commerce. his second argument is that by reason of s. 22 of the act inserted by the amending act of 1957, being madras act i of 1957, the act imposes no tax on transactions under consideration in this appeal; it merely imposes a tax on transactions which are generally known as explanation sales ..... are clearly of the opinion that it does not. a little history of that section is necessary here. section 22 of the act, as it stood before the amending act of 1957, was inserted by the adaptation of laws (fourth amendment) order, 1952, made by the president in exercise of the powers conferred on him by art. 372(2) of the constitution ..... legislation by parliament, and it lifts the ban imposed by art. 286(2). clause (2) of art. 286 as it stood before the constitution (sixth amendment) act, 1956, was in these terms : '(2). except in so far as parliament may by law otherwise provide, no law of a state shall impose, or authorise the imposition .....

Ferguson Vs. Georgia

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 6 res judicatae 60. the statute in northern ireland is the criminal evidence act (northern ireland); the irish statute is the criminal justice (evidence) act. for the indian statute, see code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1955, 61, in 42 a.i.rep. (1955), indian acts section p. 91. [ footnote 9 ] opposition on this score was marked ..... of the enactment of the general competency statute. see 56 hansard, parliamentary debates, 4th series, pp. 977-978. the most important was the criminal law amendment act of 1885, 48 & 49 vict., c. 69, which made defendants competent in certain felony prosecutions. most of the other statutes involved offenses created by ..... question him. to the argument that to deny counsel the "right to ask the defendant any questions on the stand . . . violates . . . [amendment] vi . . . [and] the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the united states . . . [because] it deprives the defendant of the benefit of his counsel asking him questions at the most .....

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Kandimalla Subbaiah and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1241; 1961CriLJ302; [1962]1SCR194

..... the circumstances stated by the high court, and therefore he will have that jurisdiction which he is competent to exercise under the prevention of corruption act or the criminal law amendment act. section 6 of the former provides that the state government may appoint a special judge to try the following offences : (a) an offence ..... in addition said to have committed offences under s. 420, indian penal code. 4. the subordinate judge, vijayawada was appointed as special judge under the provisions of s. 6 of the criminal law amendment act, 1952 (ii of 1952) to try offences under the prevention of corruption act, 1947. he framed the following charges : 'charge no. ..... punishable under section 161, section 165 or section 165a of the indian penal code (act xlv of 1860) or sub-section (2) of section 5 of the prevention of corruption act, 1947 .....