Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 1961 Page 10 of about 97 results (1.543 seconds)

Fpc Vs. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... resulting from such purchases. though i regard the matter as less clear than the court does, i agree that the legislative history of the 1942 amendments to the natural gas act supports the commission's power to consider inferior end use as a factor in denying transco a transportation certificate for the gas in question. however, ..... x-20" service. under the contract, transco agreed to transport 50,000 mcf. daily to con. ed. in new york for use under con. ed.'s boilers, principally two boilers at con. ed.'s waterside station which were then being fired by coal. additionally, during a 60-day peak period, transco agreed to sell 50,000 mcf. ..... 5 that the public interest would suffer were transco's petition granted. among the grounds advanced were that the gas was to be transported for use under industrial boilers, this disposition being an "inferior" use from the standpoint of conserving a valuable natural resource; that authorization of this and similar direct sales to major industrial users .....

Management of May and Baker (India) Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC678; [1961(2)FLR594]; (1961)IILLJ94SC

..... each case from the nature of the duties whether a person employed is a workman or not, under the definition of that word as it existed before the amendment of 1956.the nature of the duties of mukerjee is not in dispute in this case and the only question,therefore, is whether looking to the nature of ..... clear that mukerjee's duties were mainly neither clerical nor manual. therefore, as mukerjee was not a workman his case would not be covered by the industrial disputes act and the tribunal would have no jurisdiction to order his reinstatement. we, therefore, set aside the order of the tribunal directing reinstatement of mukerjee along with other reliefs ..... gratuity. so far as retrenchment compensation is concerned, the tribunal has held that iqbal singh was entitled to retrenchment compensation under section. 25-f of the industrial disputes act. this view of the tribunal is in our opinion incorrect. section 25-f came into force on october 24, 1953, while the services of iqbal singh were .....

Gopal Vinayak Godse Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC600; (1961)63BOMLR517; 1961CriLJ736a; [1961]3SCR440

..... so, what was the term for which he could be so imprisoned. we shall briefly notice the relevant provisions of the indian penal code before it was amended by the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act xxvi of 1955. section 53 of the indian penal code set out six different punishments to which offenders were liable. the second of those punishments was transportation and the ..... provisions, particularly in view of s. 53a of the indian penal code which has been added by act xxvi of 1955. section 53a of the said code reads : '(1) .................(2) in every case in which a sentence of transportation for a term has been passed before the commencement of the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1954, the offender shall be dealt with in .....

Bhor Industries Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay-city I

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1100; [1961]42ITR57(SC); [1961]3SCR409

..... 1949. by the taxation laws (extension to merged states and amendment) act, 1949, which received the assent of the governor-general on december 31, 1949, the indian income-tax act was extended to the merged states with effect from april 1, 1949. that act also introduced s. 60a in the income-tax act, by which power was given to the central government, if ..... do not affect the operation of s. 23a on the assessable income of the company which, by reason of the application of the indian income-tax act even prior to the extension act, was assessable under the indian income-tax act. dividends payable out of that portion of the income will attract s. 23a, and s. 14(2)(c) does not apply ..... accruing or arising within the taxable territory as distributed among the shareholders. the right of the department to pass an order under s. 23a(1) of the indian income-tax act was not challenged before the tribunal, and it was not the subject of a decision in the high court. the argument still has been, on behalf of .....

Babulal Parate Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC884; 1961CriLJ16; [1961]3SCR423

..... by notification in the official gazette, otherwise directs'. 8. sub-section (1) confers powers not on the executive but on certain magistrates. this provision has been amended in some states, as for instance, the former bombay state where power has been conferred on the commissioner of police to pass an order thereunder. but we are ..... or an appropriate writ forbidding respondent no. 4 from proceeding further with the prosecution of the petitioner for offences under sections 143 and 188 of the indian penal code read with s. 117 thereof, for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner before respondent no. 4 and for the issue of a writ of ..... magistrate (not being a magistrate of the third class) specially empowered by the 'state government' or the chief presidency magistrate or the district magistrate to act under this section there is sufficient ground for proceeding under this section and immediate prevention or speedy remedy is desirable, such magistrate may, by a written order .....

Gouri Prasad Bagaria and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Ben ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1961]42ITR112(SC)

..... appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the high court of calcutta dated december 14, 1955, in an income-tax reference under section 66(1) of the indian income-tax act. the high court answered the question : 'whether, on the above facts and circumstances of this case, there was any material before before the tribunal to hold that the assessee .....

Tulsidas Kilachand Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City I

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC1023; (1961)GLR1(SC); [1961]42ITR1(SC); [1961]3SCR351

..... ..........................................................(c) all income arising to any person by virtue of a settlement or disposition whether revocable or not, and whether effected before or after the commencement of the indian income-tax (amendment) act, 1939 (7 of 1939), from assets remaining the property of the settlor or disponer, shall be deemed to be income of the settlor or disponer, and all ..... of trust by him, they were held by him not in his personal capacity but as a trustee. no doubt, under sections 5 and 6 of the indian trusts act if the declarer of the trust is himself the trustee also, there is no need that he must transfer the property to himself as trustee; but the law ..... , after being grossed up, was not liable to be included in his total income, in view of the third provision to s. 16(1)(c) of the indian income-tax act - section 16(1). the income-tax officer did not accept this contention, and though the assessment order is not before us, we gather from the statement of .....