Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-06-1961
Reported in : (1962)ILLJ534P& H
..... by the punjab government clearly reads as saying:in exercise of the powers conferred by section 7a of the industrial disputes act, 1947, as inserted by section 4 of the industrial disputes (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1956 (no. 36 of 1956), and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the governor of punjab is ..... new tribunal was being constituted in exercise of the powers of the governor conferred by section 7a of the industrial disputes act, 1947, as inserted by section 4 of the industrial disputes (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1966 (36 of 1956) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf. on 4 june 1957; the ..... gujral, had originally been appointed as the presiding officer of the industrial tribunal, punjab, under section 7 of the act as in force before the commencement of the industrial disputes (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1956, and that his term as such was extended from time to time by means of various notifications of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-04-1961
Reported in : AIR1961P& H411
..... made by him on the will as sufficient coupled with the evidence of the other attesting witness, amar singh, to satisfy the requirements of section 63 of the indian succession act. . it is this view in particular which has been assailed before us by the learned counsel for the appellants.4. the proposition canvassed is that under ..... section 63 of the indian succession act the will must be attested by two or more witnesses and that a sub-registrar while registering a will presented to him by the testator cannot be ..... argument was not acceptable because prima facie before a document was presented for registration, it must be completed as required by the provisions of the transfer of property act. if what happened at the time of registration was regarded as affording attestation to the document, it might lead to the result that the document was presented for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-02-1961
Reported in : AIR1961P& H314
..... plaintiffs' suit, which was filed on 23rd of august, 1948, is barred by limitation. according to the trial judge the case is covered by article 115 of the indian limitation act, which provides a period of three years for a suit for compensation for the breach of any contract, express or implied, not in writing registered, from the date ..... pleas gave rise to the following issues:(1) is the suit barred by time?(2) is the suit barred under section 19 of the defence of india act read with act ii of 1948?(3) are the plaintiffs estopped from claiming any compensation?(4) relief.the first and the third issues were answered in the affirmative and the ..... the rule of estoppel in general has been incorporated in section 115 of the indian evidence act, which runs as under,'when one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit .....
Tag this Judgment!